| Literature DB >> 29110288 |
Ami E Iskandrian1, Vasken Dilsizian2, Ernest V Garcia3, Rob S Beanlands4, Manuel Cerqueira5, Prem Soman6, Daniel S Berman7, Alberto Cuocolo8, Andrew J Einstein9, Charity J Morgan10, Fadi G Hage10,11, Heinrich R Schelbert12, Jeroen J Bax13, Joseph C Wu14, Leslee J Shaw3, Mehran M Sadeghi15, Nagara Tamaki16, Philipp A Kaufmann17, Robert Gropler18, Sharmila Dorbala19, William Van Decker20.
Abstract
As the second term of our commitment to Journal begins, we, the editors, would like to reflect on a few topics that have relevance today. These include prognostication and paradigm shifts; Serial testing: How to handle data? Is the change in perfusion predictive of outcome and which one? Ischemia-guided therapy: fractional flow reserve vs perfusion vs myocardial blood flow; positron emission tomography (PET) imaging using Rubidium-82 vs N-13 ammonia vs F-18 Flurpiridaz; How to differentiate microvascular disease from 3-vessel disease by PET? The imaging scene outside the United States, what are the differences and similarities? Radiation exposure; Special issues with the new cameras? Is attenuation correction needed? Are there normal databases and are these specific to each camera system? And finally, hybrid imaging with single-photon emission tomography or PET combined with computed tomography angiography or coronary calcium score. We hope these topics are of interest to our readers.Entities:
Keywords: Myocardial perfusion imaging; coronary artery disease; nuclear imaging; positron emission tomography; prognosis; single-photon emission tomography
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29110288 DOI: 10.1007/s12350-017-1093-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Nucl Cardiol ISSN: 1071-3581 Impact factor: 5.952