Literature DB >> 28585034

Myocardial perfusion imaging in women for the evaluation of stable ischemic heart disease-state-of-the-evidence and clinical recommendations.

Viviany R Taqueti1,2, Sharmila Dorbala3,4, David Wolinsky5, Brian Abbott6,7, Gary V Heller8, Timothy M Bateman9, Jennifer H Mieres10, Lawrence M Phillips11, Nanette K Wenger12, Leslee J Shaw12.   

Abstract

This document from the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology represents an updated consensus statement on the evidence base of stress myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI), emphasizing new developments in single-photon emission tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography (PET) in the clinical evaluation of women presenting with symptoms of stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD). The clinical evaluation of symptomatic women is challenging due to their varying clinical presentation, clinical risk factor burden, high degree of comorbidity, and increased risk of major ischemic heart disease events. Evidence is substantial that both SPECT and PET MPI effectively risk stratify women with SIHD. The addition of coronary flow reserve (CFR) with PET improves risk detection, including for women with nonobstructive coronary artery disease and coronary microvascular dysfunction. With the advent of PET with computed tomography (CT), multiparametric imaging approaches may enable integration of MPI and CFR with CT visualization of anatomical atherosclerotic plaque to uniquely identify at-risk women. Radiation dose-reduction strategies, including the use of ultra-low-dose protocols involving stress-only imaging, solid-state detector SPECT, and PET, should be uniformly applied whenever possible to all women undergoing MPI. Appropriate candidate selection for stress MPI and for post-MPI indications for guideline-directed medical therapy and/or invasive coronary angiography are discussed in this statement. The critical need for randomized and comparative trial data in female patients is also emphasized.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ASNC consensus statement; Stable ischemic heart disease; imaging; women

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28585034      PMCID: PMC5942593          DOI: 10.1007/s12350-017-0926-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN: 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


  174 in total

1.  Stable angina pectoris with no obstructive coronary artery disease is associated with increased risks of major adverse cardiovascular events.

Authors:  Lasse Jespersen; Anders Hvelplund; Steen Z Abildstrøm; Frants Pedersen; Søren Galatius; Jan K Madsen; Erik Jørgensen; Henning Kelbæk; Eva Prescott
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2011-09-11       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 2.  Clinical myocardial perfusion PET/CT.

Authors:  Marcelo F Di Carli; Sharmila Dorbala; Jolene Meserve; Georges El Fakhri; Arkadiusz Sitek; Stephen C Moore
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Incremental prognostic value of gated Rb-82 positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging over clinical variables and rest LVEF.

Authors:  Sharmila Dorbala; Rory Hachamovitch; Zelmira Curillova; Deepak Thomas; Divya Vangala; Raymond Y Kwong; Marcelo F Di Carli
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-07

4.  Independent and incremental prognostic value of left ventricular ejection fraction determined by stress gated rubidium 82 PET imaging in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Kirkeith Lertsburapa; Alan W Ahlberg; Timothy M Bateman; Deborah Katten; Lyndy Volker; S James Cullom; Gary V Heller
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  The coronary artery calcium score and stress myocardial perfusion imaging provide independent and complementary prediction of cardiac risk.

Authors:  Su Min Chang; Faisal Nabi; Jiaqiong Xu; Leif E Peterson; Arup Achari; Craig M Pratt; John J Mahmarian
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 6.  American Society of Nuclear Cardiology consensus statement: Task Force on Women and Coronary Artery Disease--the role of myocardial perfusion imaging in the clinical evaluation of coronary artery disease in women [correction].

Authors:  Jennifer H Mieres; Leslee J Shaw; Robert C Hendel; D Douglas Miller; Robert O Bonow; Daniel S Berman; Gary V Heller; Jennifer H Mieres; C Noel Bairey-Merz; Daniel S Berman; Robert O Bonow; Jean M Cacciabaudo; Gary V Heller; Robert C Hendel; Maria C Kiess; D Douglas Miller; Donna M Polk; Leslee J Shaw; Paola E Smanio; Mary N Walsh
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  Normal stress-only versus standard stress/rest myocardial perfusion imaging: similar patient mortality with reduced radiation exposure.

Authors:  Su Min Chang; Faisal Nabi; Jiaqiong Xu; Umara Raza; John J Mahmarian
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Clinical value of stress-only Tc-99m SPECT imaging: importance of attenuation correction.

Authors:  Shishir Mathur; Gary V Heller; Timothy M Bateman; Richard Ruffin; Arshad Yekta; Deborah Katten; Nitya Alluri; Alan W Ahlberg
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  Implementation of NICE Clinical Guideline 95 for assessment of stable chest pain in a rapid access chest pain clinic reduces the mean number of investigations and cost per patient.

Authors:  Alvin J X Lee; Michael Michail; Shumonta A Quaderi; James A Richardson; Suneil K Aggarwal; M Elsya Speechly-Dick
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2015-02-19

10.  Rationale and design of the Clinical Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Coronary heart disease 2 trial (CE-MARC 2): a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial of diagnostic strategies in suspected coronary heart disease.

Authors:  David P Ripley; Julia M Brown; Colin C Everett; Petra Bijsterveld; Simon Walker; Mark Sculpher; Gerry P McCann; Colin Berry; Sven Plein; John P Greenwood
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 4.749

View more
  20 in total

1.  Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction and Cardiovascular Risk in Obese Patients.

Authors:  Navkaranbir S Bajaj; Michael T Osborne; Ankur Gupta; Ali Tavakkoli; Paco E Bravo; Tomas Vita; Courtney F Bibbo; Jon Hainer; Sharmila Dorbala; Ron Blankstein; Deepak L Bhatt; Marcelo F Di Carli; Viviany R Taqueti
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Sex and gender issues in cardiotoxicity: Are we ready for gynecardiooncology?

Authors:  Giuseppina Gallucci; Alba Capobianco; Sergio Molinari; Giovanni Storto
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Clinical Quantification of Myocardial Blood Flow Using PET: Joint Position Paper of the SNMMI Cardiovascular Council and the ASNC.

Authors:  Venkatesh L Murthy; Timothy M Bateman; Rob S Beanlands; Daniel S Berman; Salvador Borges-Neto; Panithaya Chareonthaitawee; Manuel D Cerqueira; Robert A deKemp; E Gordon DePuey; Vasken Dilsizian; Sharmila Dorbala; Edward P Ficaro; Ernest V Garcia; Henry Gewirtz; Gary V Heller; Howard C Lewin; Saurabh Malhotra; April Mann; Terrence D Ruddy; Thomas H Schindler; Ronald G Schwartz; Piotr J Slomka; Prem Soman; Marcelo F Di Carli; Andrew Einstein; Raymond Russell; James R Corbett
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 4.  Review of cardiovascular imaging in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology in 2017. Part 2 of 2: Myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Fadi G Hage; Wael A AlJaroudi
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 5.  Cardiovascular Imaging Techniques to Assess Microvascular Dysfunction.

Authors:  Roshin C Mathew; Jamieson M Bourque; Michael Salerno; Christopher M Kramer
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-10-11

Review 6.  Evolving, innovating, and revolutionary changes in cardiovascular imaging: We've only just begun!

Authors:  Leslee J Shaw; Rory Hachamovitch; James K Min; Marcelo Di Carli; Jennifer H Mieres; Lawrence Phillips; Ron Blankstein; Andrew Einstein; Viviany R Taqueti; Robert Hendel; Daniel S Berman
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 7.  The role of imaging in women with ischemic heart disease.

Authors:  Niti R Aggarwal; Rachel M Bond; Jennifer H Mieres
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 2.882

8.  Gender-related differences in side-effects and hemodynamic response to regadenoson in patients undergoing SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Athanasios Katsikis; Elena Kyrozi; Vasiliki Manira; Athanasios Theodorakos; Julia Malamitsi; Virginia Tsapaki; Ioannis Iakovou; Vasilios Voudris; Genovefa Kolovou; Maria Koutelou
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  Understanding Sex Differences in Coronary Artery Disease Risk: Is Coronary Anatomy Sufficient?

Authors:  Viviany R Taqueti; Ron Blankstein
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 7.792

Review 10.  Stable Ischemic Heart Disease in Women.

Authors:  Kelly M T Schmidt; John Nan; Dawn C Scantlebury; Niti R Aggarwal
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-08-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.