Literature DB >> 27050189

Early Intravenous Beta-Blockers in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Before Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Vincent Roolvink1, Borja Ibáñez2, Jan Paul Ottervanger1, Gonzalo Pizarro3, Niels van Royen4, Alonso Mateos5, Jan-Henk E Dambrink1, Noemi Escalera6, Erik Lipsic7, Agustín Albarran8, Antonio Fernández-Ortiz9, Francisco Fernández-Avilés10, Javier Goicolea11, Javier Botas12, Wouter Remkes1, Victoria Hernandez-Jaras5, Elvin Kedhi1, José L Zamorano13, Felipe Navarro14, Fernando Alfonso15, Alberto García-Lledó16, Joaquin Alonso17, Maarten van Leeuwen4, Robin Nijveldt4, Sonja Postma18, Evelien Kolkman18, Marcel Gosselink1, Bart de Smet19, Saman Rasoul20, Jan J Piek21, Valentin Fuster22, Arnoud W J van 't Hof23.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The impact of intravenous (IV) beta-blockers before primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) on infarct size and clinical outcomes is not well established.
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to conduct the first double-blind, placebo-controlled international multicenter study testing the effect of early IV beta-blockers before PPCI in a general ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) population.
METHODS: STEMI patients presenting <12 h from symptom onset in Killip class I to II without atrioventricular block were randomized 1:1 to IV metoprolol (2 × 5-mg bolus) or matched placebo before PPCI. Primary endpoint was myocardial infarct size as assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) at 30 days. Secondary endpoints were enzymatic infarct size and incidence of ventricular arrhythmias. Safety endpoints included symptomatic bradycardia, symptomatic hypotension, and cardiogenic shock.
RESULTS: A total of 683 patients (mean age 62 ± 12 years; 75% male) were randomized to metoprolol (n = 336) or placebo (n = 346). CMR was performed in 342 patients (54.8%). Infarct size (percent of left ventricle [LV]) by CMR did not differ between the metoprolol (15.3 ± 11.0%) and placebo groups (14.9 ± 11.5%; p = 0.616). Peak and area under the creatine kinase curve did not differ between both groups. LV ejection fraction by CMR was 51.0 ± 10.9% in the metoprolol group and 51.6 ± 10.8% in the placebo group (p = 0.68). The incidence of malignant arrhythmias was 3.6% in the metoprolol group versus 6.9% in placebo (p = 0.050). The incidence of adverse events was not different between groups.
CONCLUSIONS: In a nonrestricted STEMI population, early intravenous metoprolol before PPCI was not associated with a reduction in infarct size. Metoprolol reduced the incidence of malignant arrhythmias in the acute phase and was not associated with an increase in adverse events. (Early-Beta blocker Administration before reperfusion primary PCI in patients with ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction [EARLY-BAMI]; EudraCT no: 2010-023394-19).
Copyright © 2016 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiac magnetic resonance; ejection fraction; infarct size; metoprolol

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27050189     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.03.522

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  37 in total

Review 1.  Current Modalities and Mechanisms Underlying Cardioprotection by Ischemic Conditioning.

Authors:  John H Rosenberg; John H Werner; Michael J Moulton; Devendra K Agrawal
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  Acute coronary syndromes: Cardioprotection with β-blockers before primary PCI.

Authors:  Gregory B Lim
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 32.419

3.  Routine beta-blocker administration following acute myocardial infarction: why still an unsolved issue?

Authors:  Stephane Noble; Marco Roffi
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Human Tissue-Engineered Model of Myocardial Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury.

Authors:  Timothy Chen; Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 3.845

5.  Adherence Tradeoff to Multiple Preventive Therapies and All-Cause Mortality After Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Maarit J Korhonen; Jennifer G Robinson; Izabela E Annis; Ryan P Hickson; J Simon Bell; Juha Hartikainen; Gang Fang
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 6.  The Misguided Regulation of Cardiac Emergencies: The Rise of the IRB-Industrial Complex and the Increasing Risk to Cardiovascular Research and Our Patients.

Authors:  Jay H Traverse
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 17.367

7.  Myocardial ischemia: lack of coronary blood flow, myocardial oxygen supply-demand imbalance, or what?

Authors:  Gerd Heusch
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2019-04-19       Impact factor: 4.733

8.  Temporal Changes in Coronary Hyperemic and Resting Hemodynamic Indices in Nonculprit Vessels of Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Nina W van der Hoeven; Gladys N Janssens; Guus A de Waard; Henk Everaars; Christopher J Broyd; Casper W H Beijnink; Peter M van de Ven; Robin Nijveldt; Christopher M Cook; Ricardo Petraco; Tim Ten Cate; Clemens von Birgelen; Javier Escaned; Justin E Davies; Maarten A H van Leeuwen; Niels van Royen
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 14.676

Review 9.  [Acute myocardial infarction in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction : ESC guidelines 2017].

Authors:  H Thiele; S Desch; S de Waha
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.443

10.  Cardioprotection by early metoprolol- attenuation of ischemic vs. reperfusion injury?

Authors:  Petra Kleinbongard
Journal:  Basic Res Cardiol       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 17.165

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.