Maarit J Korhonen1, Jennifer G Robinson2, Izabela E Annis3, Ryan P Hickson3, J Simon Bell4, Juha Hartikainen5, Gang Fang6. 1. Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; National Health and Medical Research Council Centre for Research Excellence in Frailty and Healthy Ageing, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria, Australia. 2. Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, the University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa; Department of Internal Medicine, Carver College of Medicine, the University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa. 3. Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. 4. National Health and Medical Research Council Centre for Research Excellence in Frailty and Healthy Ageing, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria, Australia. 5. Heart Center, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland; School of Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland. 6. Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. Electronic address: gang_fang@unc.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB), beta-blockers and statins are recommended after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Patients may adhere to some, but not all, therapies. OBJECTIVES: The authors investigated the effect of tradeoffs in adherence to ACE inhibitors/ARBs, beta-blockers, and statins on survival among older people after AMI. METHODS: The authors identified 90,869 Medicare beneficiaries ≥65 years of age who had prescriptions for ACE inhibitors/ARBs, beta-blockers, and statins, and survived ≥180 days after AMI hospitalization in 2008 to 2010. Adherence was measured by proportion of days covered (PDC) during 180 days following hospital discharge. Mortality follow-up extended up to 18 months after this period. The authors used Cox proportional hazards models to estimate hazard ratios of mortality for groups adherent to 2, 1, or none of the therapies versus group adherent to all 3 therapies. RESULTS: Only 49% of the patients adhered (PDC ≥80%) to all 3 therapies. Compared with being adherent to all 3 therapies, multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals [CIs]) for mortality were 1.12 (95% CI: 1.04 to 1.21) for being adherent to ACE inhibitors/ARBs and beta-blockers only, 0.98 (95% CI: 0.91 to 1.07) for ACEI/ARBs and statins only, 1.17 (95% CI: 1.10 to 1.25) beta-blockers and statins only, 1.19 (95% CI: 1.07 to 1.32) for ACE inhibitors/ARBs only, 1.32 (95% CI: 1.21 to 1.44) for beta-blockers only, 1.26 (95% CI: 1.15 to 1.38) statins only, and 1.65 (95% CI: 1.54 to 1.76) for being nonadherent (PDC <80%) to all 3 therapies. CONCLUSIONS: Patients adherent to ACE inhibitors/ARBs and statins only had similar mortality rates as those adherent to all 3 therapies, suggesting limited additional benefit for beta-blockers in patients who were adherent to statins and ACE inhibitors/ARBs. Nonadherence to ACE inhibitors/ARBs and/or statins was associated with higher mortality.
BACKGROUND:Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB), beta-blockers and statins are recommended after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Patients may adhere to some, but not all, therapies. OBJECTIVES: The authors investigated the effect of tradeoffs in adherence to ACE inhibitors/ARBs, beta-blockers, and statins on survival among older people after AMI. METHODS: The authors identified 90,869 Medicare beneficiaries ≥65 years of age who had prescriptions for ACE inhibitors/ARBs, beta-blockers, and statins, and survived ≥180 days after AMI hospitalization in 2008 to 2010. Adherence was measured by proportion of days covered (PDC) during 180 days following hospital discharge. Mortality follow-up extended up to 18 months after this period. The authors used Cox proportional hazards models to estimate hazard ratios of mortality for groups adherent to 2, 1, or none of the therapies versus group adherent to all 3 therapies. RESULTS: Only 49% of the patients adhered (PDC ≥80%) to all 3 therapies. Compared with being adherent to all 3 therapies, multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals [CIs]) for mortality were 1.12 (95% CI: 1.04 to 1.21) for being adherent to ACE inhibitors/ARBs and beta-blockers only, 0.98 (95% CI: 0.91 to 1.07) for ACEI/ARBs and statins only, 1.17 (95% CI: 1.10 to 1.25) beta-blockers and statins only, 1.19 (95% CI: 1.07 to 1.32) for ACE inhibitors/ARBs only, 1.32 (95% CI: 1.21 to 1.44) for beta-blockers only, 1.26 (95% CI: 1.15 to 1.38) statins only, and 1.65 (95% CI: 1.54 to 1.76) for being nonadherent (PDC <80%) to all 3 therapies. CONCLUSIONS:Patients adherent to ACE inhibitors/ARBs and statins only had similar mortality rates as those adherent to all 3 therapies, suggesting limited additional benefit for beta-blockers in patients who were adherent to statins and ACE inhibitors/ARBs. Nonadherence to ACE inhibitors/ARBs and/or statins was associated with higher mortality.
Authors: Niteesh K Choudhry; Robert J Glynn; Jerry Avorn; Joy L Lee; Troyen A Brennan; Lonny Reisman; Michele Toscano; Raisa Levin; Olga S Matlin; Elliott M Antman; William H Shrank Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2013-10-17 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Niteesh K Choudhry; Michael A Fischer; Jerry Avorn; Joshua N Liberman; Sebastian Schneeweiss; Juliana Pakes; Troyen A Brennan; William H Shrank Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2011-05-09
Authors: Barbara C Wimmer; Amanda J Cross; Natali Jokanovic; Michael D Wiese; Johnson George; Kristina Johnell; Basia Diug; J Simon Bell Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2016-12-19 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Marcus D Flather; Marcelo C Shibata; Andrew J S Coats; Dirk J Van Veldhuisen; Aleksandr Parkhomenko; Joszef Borbola; Alain Cohen-Solal; Dan Dumitrascu; Roberto Ferrari; Philippe Lechat; Jordi Soler-Soler; Luigi Tavazzi; Lenka Spinarova; Jiri Toman; Michael Böhm; Stefan D Anker; Simon G Thompson; Philip A Poole-Wilson Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2005-01-09 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Sripal Bangalore; Gabriel Steg; Prakash Deedwania; Kevin Crowley; Kim A Eagle; Shinya Goto; E Magnus Ohman; Christopher P Cannon; Sidney C Smith; Uwe Zeymer; Elaine B Hoffman; Franz H Messerli; Deepak L Bhatt Journal: JAMA Date: 2012-10-03 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Richard Ofori-Asenso; Jenni Ilomäki; Mark Tacey; Si Si; Andrea J Curtis; Ella Zomer; J Simon Bell; Sophia Zoungas; Danny Liew Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2018-11-08 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Clara L Rodríguez-Bernal; Francisco Sánchez-Saez; Daniel Bejarano-Quisoboni; Isabel Hurtado; Anibal García-Sempere; Salvador Peiró; Gabriel Sanfélix-Gimeno Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Date: 2022-05-25
Authors: Matthew D Solomon; Thomas K Leong; Eleanor Levin; Jamal S Rana; Marc G Jaffe; Stephen Sidney; Sue Hee Sung; Catherine Lee; Anthony DeMaria; Alan S Go Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2020-03-05 Impact factor: 5.501