Literature DB >> 23419012

Phonological similarity effect in complex span task.

Valérie Camos1, Gérôme Mora, Pierre Barrouillet.   

Abstract

The aim of our study was to test the hypothesis that two systems are involved in verbal working memory; one is specifically dedicated to the maintenance of phonological representations through verbal rehearsal while the other would maintain multimodal representations through attentional refreshing. This theoretical framework predicts that phonologically related phenomena such as the phonological similarity effect (PSE) should occur when the domain-specific system is involved in maintenance, but should disappear when concurrent articulation hinders its use. Impeding maintenance in the domain-general system by a concurrent attentional demand should impair recall performance without affecting PSE. In three experiments, we manipulated the concurrent articulation and the attentional demand induced by the processing component of complex span tasks in which participants had to maintain lists of either similar or dissimilar words. Confirming our predictions, PSE affected recall performance in complex span tasks. Although both the attentional demand and the articulatory requirement of the concurrent task impaired recall, only the induction of an articulatory suppression during maintenance made the PSE disappear. These results suggest a duality in the systems devoted to verbal maintenance in the short term, constraining models of working memory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23419012     DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2013.768275

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)        ISSN: 1747-0218            Impact factor:   2.143


  15 in total

1.  Promoting the experimental dialogue between working memory and chunking: Behavioral data and simulation.

Authors:  Sophie Portrat; Alessandro Guida; Thierry Phénix; Benoît Lemaire
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-04

2.  The impact of cognitive load on delayed recall.

Authors:  Valérie Camos; Sophie Portrat
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-08

3.  What is the time course of working memory attentional refreshing?

Authors:  Benoît Lemaire; Aurore Pageot; Gaën Plancher; Sophie Portrat
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-02

4.  Phonological similarity in working memory span tasks.

Authors:  Michael Chow; Brooke N Macnamara; Andrew R A Conway
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-08

5.  Interpreting potential markers of storage and rehearsal: Implications for studies of verbal short-term memory and neuropsychological cases.

Authors:  Xiaoli Wang; Robert H Logie; Christopher Jarrold
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-08

6.  The effects of refreshing and elaboration on working memory performance, and their contributions to long-term memory formation.

Authors:  Lea M Bartsch; Henrik Singmann; Klaus Oberauer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-07

7.  On some of the main criticisms of the modal model: Reappraisal from a TBRS perspective.

Authors:  Gaën Plancher; Pierre Barrouillet
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-04

Review 8.  Inner Speech: Development, Cognitive Functions, Phenomenology, and Neurobiology.

Authors:  Ben Alderson-Day; Charles Fernyhough
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2015-05-25       Impact factor: 17.737

9.  Working memory still needs verbal rehearsal.

Authors:  Annalisa Lucidi; Naomi Langerock; Violette Hoareau; Benoît Lemaire; Valérie Camos; Pierre Barrouillet
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-02

10.  Forward Digit Span and Word Familiarity Do Not Correlate With Differences in Speech Recognition in Individuals With Cochlear Implants After Accounting for Auditory Resolution.

Authors:  Adam K Bosen; Victoria A Sevich; Shauntelle A Cannon
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.