Kristina Wasmer1, Dirk G Dechering2, Julia Köbe2, Gerold Mönnig2, Christian Pott2, Gerrit Frommeyer2, Philipp S Lange2, Simon Kochhäuser2, Lars Eckardt2. 1. Abteilung für Rhythmologie, Department für Kardiologie und Angiologie, Universitätsklinikum Münster (UKM), Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Gebäude A1, 48149, Münster, Germany. wasmerk@ukmuenster.de. 2. Abteilung für Rhythmologie, Department für Kardiologie und Angiologie, Universitätsklinikum Münster (UKM), Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Gebäude A1, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Assumption of different substrates is the basis for different ablation strategies in patients with paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). We aimed to investigate pulmonary vein reconnection and influence on progression of initial paroxysmal (pAF) versus persistent atrial fibrillation (perAF). METHODS: Between January 2010 and November 2012, 149 patients (117 men, mean age 59 ± 11 years, range 27-80 years) underwent at least one redo antral pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using NavX-guided irrigated-tip radiofrequency catheter ablation. We analyzed whether and where reconnection of pulmonary veins was detected, and whether there were differences between patients with pAF and perAF. RESULTS: Of the 149 patients who underwent a redo antral PVI, 80 patients had pAF and 69 had perAF. One, two and three redo PVIs were performed in 149, 26 and 6 patients, respectively. Reconnection of at least one PV was detected in all patients at the second PVI, in 19 of 26 patients (73 %) at the third PVI and 5 of 6 patients (83 %) at the fourth PVI. 20 (29 %) patients with perAF prior to the first PVI had pAF at the second PVI, whereas 15 (19 %) patients with initial pAF had persistent AF at the time of the first redo procedure. From the second to the third PVI, four patients had developed perAF after previous pAF and two with per AF now had pAF. PV reconnection was observed independent of underlying AF type. At the second redo procedure, of those with reconnected veins 12 had pAF and 13 perAF. At the third redo procedure, four patients had pAF and four perAF. CONCLUSION: Most patients with recurrent AF after PVI showed at least one reconnected vein during redo procedures. Reconnection was identified irrespective of the underlying AF type. Progression from pAF to perAF and vice versa was observed irrespective of the initial AF type.
BACKGROUND: Assumption of different substrates is the basis for different ablation strategies in patients with paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). We aimed to investigate pulmonary vein reconnection and influence on progression of initial paroxysmal (pAF) versus persistent atrial fibrillation (perAF). METHODS: Between January 2010 and November 2012, 149 patients (117 men, mean age 59 ± 11 years, range 27-80 years) underwent at least one redo antral pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using NavX-guided irrigated-tip radiofrequency catheter ablation. We analyzed whether and where reconnection of pulmonary veins was detected, and whether there were differences between patients with pAF and perAF. RESULTS: Of the 149 patients who underwent a redo antral PVI, 80 patients had pAF and 69 had perAF. One, two and three redo PVIs were performed in 149, 26 and 6 patients, respectively. Reconnection of at least one PV was detected in all patients at the second PVI, in 19 of 26 patients (73 %) at the third PVI and 5 of 6 patients (83 %) at the fourth PVI. 20 (29 %) patients with perAF prior to the first PVI had pAF at the second PVI, whereas 15 (19 %) patients with initial pAF had persistent AF at the time of the first redo procedure. From the second to the third PVI, four patients had developed perAF after previous pAF and two with per AF now had pAF. PV reconnection was observed independent of underlying AF type. At the second redo procedure, of those with reconnected veins 12 had pAF and 13 perAF. At the third redo procedure, four patients had pAF and four perAF. CONCLUSION: Most patients with recurrent AF after PVI showed at least one reconnected vein during redo procedures. Reconnection was identified irrespective of the underlying AF type. Progression from pAF to perAF and vice versa was observed irrespective of the initial AF type.
Authors: Michel Haïssaguerre; Prashanthan Sanders; Mélèze Hocini; Yoshihide Takahashi; Martin Rotter; Frederic Sacher; Thomas Rostock; Li-Fern Hsu; Pierre Bordachar; Sylvain Reuter; Raymond Roudaut; Jacques Clémenty; Pierre Jaïs Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2005-11
Authors: Michel Haïssaguerre; Mélèze Hocini; Prashanthan Sanders; Frederic Sacher; Martin Rotter; Yoshihide Takahashi; Thomas Rostock; Li-Fern Hsu; Pierre Bordachar; Sylvain Reuter; Raymond Roudaut; Jacques Clémenty; Pierre Jaïs Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2005-11
Authors: Oussama M Wazni; Nassir F Marrouche; David O Martin; Atul Verma; Mandeep Bhargava; Walid Saliba; Dianna Bash; Robert Schweikert; Johannes Brachmann; Jens Gunther; Klaus Gutleben; Ennio Pisano; Dominico Potenza; Raffaele Fanelli; Antonio Raviele; Sakis Themistoclakis; Antonio Rossillo; Aldo Bonso; Andrea Natale Journal: JAMA Date: 2005-06-01 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Anthony G Brooks; Martin K Stiles; Julien Laborderie; Dennis H Lau; Pawel Kuklik; Nicholas J Shipp; Li-Fern Hsu; Prashanthan Sanders Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2010-01-22 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Sanjiv M Narayan; David E Krummen; Paul Clopton; Kalyanam Shivkumar; John M Miller Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2013-04-03 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Hakan Oral; Aman Chugh; Kentaro Yoshida; Jean F Sarrazin; Michael Kuhne; Thomas Crawford; Nagib Chalfoun; Darryl Wells; Warangkna Boonyapisit; Srikar Veerareddy; Sreedhar Billakanty; Wai S Wong; Eric Good; Krit Jongnarangsin; Frank Pelosi; Frank Bogun; Fred Morady Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2009-03-03 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Demosthenes G Katritsis; Evgeny Pokushalov; Alexander Romanov; Eleftherios Giazitzoglou; George C M Siontis; Sunny S Po; A John Camm; John P A Ioannidis Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2013-08-21 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Hugh Calkins; Gerhard Hindricks; Riccardo Cappato; Young-Hoon Kim; Eduardo B Saad; Luis Aguinaga; Joseph G Akar; Vinay Badhwar; Josep Brugada; John Camm; Peng-Sheng Chen; Shih-Ann Chen; Mina K Chung; Jens Cosedis Nielsen; Anne B Curtis; D Wyn Davies; John D Day; André d'Avila; N M S Natasja de Groot; Luigi Di Biase; Mattias Duytschaever; James R Edgerton; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; Patrick T Ellinor; Sabine Ernst; Guilherme Fenelon; Edward P Gerstenfeld; David E Haines; Michel Haissaguerre; Robert H Helm; Elaine Hylek; Warren M Jackman; Jose Jalife; Jonathan M Kalman; Josef Kautzner; Hans Kottkamp; Karl Heinz Kuck; Koichiro Kumagai; Richard Lee; Thorsten Lewalter; Bruce D Lindsay; Laurent Macle; Moussa Mansour; Francis E Marchlinski; Gregory F Michaud; Hiroshi Nakagawa; Andrea Natale; Stanley Nattel; Ken Okumura; Douglas Packer; Evgeny Pokushalov; Matthew R Reynolds; Prashanthan Sanders; Mauricio Scanavacca; Richard Schilling; Claudio Tondo; Hsuan-Ming Tsao; Atul Verma; David J Wilber; Teiichi Yamane Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2017-05-12 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Hugh Calkins; Karl Heinz Kuck; Riccardo Cappato; Josep Brugada; A John Camm; Shih-Ann Chen; Harry J G Crijns; Ralph J Damiano; D Wyn Davies; John DiMarco; James Edgerton; Kenneth Ellenbogen; Michael D Ezekowitz; David E Haines; Michel Haissaguerre; Gerhard Hindricks; Yoshito Iesaka; Warren Jackman; José Jalife; Pierre Jais; Jonathan Kalman; David Keane; Young-Hoon Kim; Paulus Kirchhof; George Klein; Hans Kottkamp; Koichiro Kumagai; Bruce D Lindsay; Moussa Mansour; Francis E Marchlinski; Patrick M McCarthy; J Lluis Mont; Fred Morady; Koonlawee Nademanee; Hiroshi Nakagawa; Andrea Natale; Stanley Nattel; Douglas L Packer; Carlo Pappone; Eric Prystowsky; Antonio Raviele; Vivek Reddy; Jeremy N Ruskin; Richard J Shemin; Hsuan-Ming Tsao; David Wilber Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2012-03-01 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Hugh Calkins; Gerhard Hindricks; Riccardo Cappato; Young-Hoon Kim; Eduardo B Saad; Luis Aguinaga; Joseph G Akar; Vinay Badhwar; Josep Brugada; John Camm; Peng-Sheng Chen; Shih-Ann Chen; Mina K Chung; Jens Cosedis Nielsen; Anne B Curtis; D Wyn Davies; John D Day; André d'Avila; N M S Natasja de Groot; Luigi Di Biase; Mattias Duytschaever; James R Edgerton; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; Patrick T Ellinor; Sabine Ernst; Guilherme Fenelon; Edward P Gerstenfeld; David E Haines; Michel Haissaguerre; Robert H Helm; Elaine Hylek; Warren M Jackman; Jose Jalife; Jonathan M Kalman; Josef Kautzner; Hans Kottkamp; Karl Heinz Kuck; Koichiro Kumagai; Richard Lee; Thorsten Lewalter; Bruce D Lindsay; Laurent Macle; Moussa Mansour; Francis E Marchlinski; Gregory F Michaud; Hiroshi Nakagawa; Andrea Natale; Stanley Nattel; Ken Okumura; Douglas Packer; Evgeny Pokushalov; Matthew R Reynolds; Prashanthan Sanders; Mauricio Scanavacca; Richard Schilling; Claudio Tondo; Hsuan-Ming Tsao; Atul Verma; David J Wilber; Teiichi Yamane Journal: Europace Date: 2018-01-01 Impact factor: 5.214
Authors: Francesco Santoro; Christian Sohns; Ardan M Saguner; Natale Daniele Brunetti; Christine Lemes; Shibu Mathew; Christian-H Heeger; Bruno Reißmann; Tilman Maurer; Johannes Riedl; Thomas Fink; Kentaro Hayashi; Feifan Ouyang; Matteo Di Biase; Karl-Heinz Kuck; Andreas Metzner Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2016-11-16 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Benjamin Schaeffer; Stephan Willems; Christian Meyer; Jakob Lüker; Ruken Ö Akbulak; Julia Moser; Mario Jularic; Christian Eickholt; Jana M Schwarzl; Melanie Gunawardene; Pawel Kuklik; Arian Sultan; Boris A Hoffmann; Daniel Steven Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2018-03-02 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Tobias Plenge; Jan-Hendrik van den Bruck; Jakob Lüker; Arian Sultan; Daniel Steven Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2019-07-19 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Hai Deng; Ying Bai; Alena Shantsila; Laurent Fauchier; Tatjana S Potpara; Gregory Y H Lip Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2017-05-30 Impact factor: 5.460