AIMS: Contact force (CF) catheters provide catheter-tissue contact information to improve outcome of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). We evaluated different target-CF values for achievement of the additional endpoint of an unexcitable ablation line. METHODS: A total of 106 patients undergoing PVI were randomized into three groups (G) (G1: target-CF 15 g, G2: target-CF 10 g, G3: CF concealed from operator). The PVI encircling line was divided into predefined sections. Excitable tissue along the PVI-line identified by high output pacing (10 V, 2 ms) was targeted for further ablation. RESULTS: Mean average CF was 17.4 ± 4.7 g (G1) vs. 12.3 ± 6.0 g (G2) vs. 11.1 ± 6.5 g (G 3) (p < 0.001). Primary unexcitable ablation lines were found in 38.6, 19.4 and 5.7% (G1, G2, G3 respectively; G1 vs. G2 p < 0.05, G1 vs. G3 p < 0.001, G2 vs. G3 ns). Additional radiofrequency (RF)-energy to achieve unexcitability was lowest in G1 (3.6 ± 3.1 kJ vs. 8.6 ± 7.2 kJ (G2) and 10.4 ± 6.7 (G3), p ≤ 0.001, G2 vs. G3 ns) with accordingly lowest additional RF applications in G1 (3.0 ± 2.6 vs. 7.0 ± 5.4 in G2 and 8.4 ± 4.0 in G3; G1 vs. G2 and G3, p < 0.001, G 2 vs. G 3 ns). Sections along ablation lines with low initial CF were most likely to reveal excitability. Single procedure success was 81.9 vs. 73.5 vs. 71.4% (G 1, 2 and 3, p = 0.6) during 437 ± 254 day follow-up. CONCLUSION: Higher tip-to-tissue CF during PVI facilitates the achievement of an unexcitable ablation line, requiring less additional RF-energy.
RCT Entities:
AIMS: Contact force (CF) catheters provide catheter-tissue contact information to improve outcome of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). We evaluated different target-CF values for achievement of the additional endpoint of an unexcitable ablation line. METHODS: A total of 106 patients undergoing PVI were randomized into three groups (G) (G1: target-CF 15 g, G2: target-CF 10 g, G3: CF concealed from operator). The PVI encircling line was divided into predefined sections. Excitable tissue along the PVI-line identified by high output pacing (10 V, 2 ms) was targeted for further ablation. RESULTS: Mean average CF was 17.4 ± 4.7 g (G1) vs. 12.3 ± 6.0 g (G2) vs. 11.1 ± 6.5 g (G 3) (p < 0.001). Primary unexcitable ablation lines were found in 38.6, 19.4 and 5.7% (G1, G2, G3 respectively; G1 vs. G2 p < 0.05, G1 vs. G3 p < 0.001, G2 vs. G3 ns). Additional radiofrequency (RF)-energy to achieve unexcitability was lowest in G1 (3.6 ± 3.1 kJ vs. 8.6 ± 7.2 kJ (G2) and 10.4 ± 6.7 (G3), p ≤ 0.001, G2 vs. G3 ns) with accordingly lowest additional RF applications in G1 (3.0 ± 2.6 vs. 7.0 ± 5.4 in G2 and 8.4 ± 4.0 in G3; G1 vs. G2 and G3, p < 0.001, G 2 vs. G 3 ns). Sections along ablation lines with low initial CF were most likely to reveal excitability. Single procedure success was 81.9 vs. 73.5 vs. 71.4% (G 1, 2 and 3, p = 0.6) during 437 ± 254 day follow-up. CONCLUSION: Higher tip-to-tissue CF during PVI facilitates the achievement of an unexcitable ablation line, requiring less additional RF-energy.
Authors: Andrea Natale; Vivek Y Reddy; George Monir; David J Wilber; Bruce D Lindsay; H Thomas McElderry; Charan Kantipudi; Moussa C Mansour; Daniel P Melby; Douglas L Packer; Hiroshi Nakagawa; Baohui Zhang; Robert B Stagg; Lee Ming Boo; Francis E Marchlinski Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2014-08-19 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Vivek Y Reddy; Dipen Shah; Josef Kautzner; Boris Schmidt; Nadir Saoudi; Claudia Herrera; Pierre Jaïs; Gerhard Hindricks; Petr Peichl; Aude Yulzari; Hendrik Lambert; Petr Neuzil; Andrea Natale; Karl-Heinz Kuck Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2012-07-20 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Daniel Steven; Vivek Y Reddy; Keiichi Inada; Kurt C Roberts-Thomson; Jens Seiler; William G Stevenson; Gregory F Michaud Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2009-11-12 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Waqas Ullah; Ailsa McLean; Muzahir H Tayebjee; Dhiraj Gupta; Matthew R Ginks; Guy A Haywood; Mark O'Neill; Pier D Lambiase; Mark J Earley; Richard J Schilling Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2016-05-09 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Andreas Rillig; Tina Lin; Boris Schmidt; Britta Feige; Christian Heeger; Jascha Wegner; Erik Wissner; Andreas Metzner; Anita Arya; Shibu Mathew; Peter Wohlmuth; Feifan Ouyang; Karl-Heinz Kuck; Roland Richard Tilz Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2015-07-22 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Chan-Il Park; Heiko Lehrmann; Cornelius Keyl; Reinhold Weber; Jochen Schiebeling; Juergen Allgeier; Patrick Schurr; Ashok Shah; Franz-Josef Neumann; Thomas Arentz; Amir S Jadidi Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2014-04-02
Authors: Christian Sohns; Ardan M Saguner; Christine Lemes; Francesco Santoro; Shibu Mathew; Christian Heeger; Bruno Reißmann; Tilman Maurer; Johannes Riedl; Thomas Fink; Kentaro Hayashi; Feifan Ouyang; Karl-Heinz Kuck; Andreas Metzner Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2016-06-11 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Mohammed Shurrab; Luigi Di Biase; David F Briceno; Anna Kaoutskaia; Saleem Haj-Yahia; David Newman; Ilan Lashevsky; Hiroshi Nakagawa; Eugene Crystal Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2015-09-21 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Nele Gessler; Stephan Willems; Daniel Steven; Jens Aberle; Ruken Oezge Akbulak; Nils Gosau; Boris A Hoffmann; Christian Meyer; Arian Sultan; Roland Tilz; Julia Vogler; Peter Wohlmuth; Susanne Scholz; Melanie A Gunawardene; Christian Eickholt; Jakob Lüker Journal: Europace Date: 2021-10-09 Impact factor: 5.214