Literature DB >> 16302893

Catheter ablation of long-lasting persistent atrial fibrillation: clinical outcome and mechanisms of subsequent arrhythmias.

Michel Haïssaguerre1, Mélèze Hocini, Prashanthan Sanders, Frederic Sacher, Martin Rotter, Yoshihide Takahashi, Thomas Rostock, Li-Fern Hsu, Pierre Bordachar, Sylvain Reuter, Raymond Roudaut, Jacques Clémenty, Pierre Jaïs.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) is challenging in patients with long-standing persistent AF. The clinical outcome and subsequent arrhythmia recurrence after using an ablation method targeting multiple left atrial sites with the aim of achieving acute AF termination has not been characterized.
METHODS: Sixty patients (mean age: 53 +/- 9 years) with persistent AF (mean duration: 17 +/- 27 months) were prospectively followed after catheter ablation. Catheter ablation targeting the following sites was performed in a random sequence: (i) electrical isolation of all pulmonary veins (PV); (ii) disconnection of other thoracic veins; (iii) atrial ablation at sites possessing complex electrical activity, activation gradients, or short cycle lengths. Finally, linear ablation of the LA roof and mitral isthmus was performed if sinus rhythm was not restored following energy delivery to the above sites. At 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after ablation, patients underwent clinical review and 24-hour ambulatory ECG monitoring to identify asymptomatic arrhythmia. Repeat mapping and catheter ablation was performed in any patient experiencing recurrent atrial tachycardia (AT). Clinical success was defined as the absence of any sustained atrial arrhythmia.
RESULTS: AF terminated during ablation in 52 patients (87%). The fluoroscopy and procedural durations were 84 +/- 30 minutes and 264 +/- 77 minutes, respectively. Three months after ablation, sustained ATs were documented in 24 patients (associated with AF in 2). Mapping in 23 patients showed a single AT in 7 while multiple ATs were observed in 16. Macroreentry was confirmed to be due to gaps in the ablation lines, while focal ATs originated from discrete sites or isthmuses near the left atrial appendage, coronary sinus, pulmonary veins, or fossa ovalis; these sites were similar to those at which the greatest impact was observed on the fibrillatory process during the initial ablation procedure. After repeat ablation, at 11 +/- 6 months of follow-up, 57 patients (95%) were in sinus rhythm and 3 developed recurrent AF or AT. All patients in sinus rhythm demonstrated improved exercise capacity and all but 2 had evidence of atrial transport as assessed by Doppler echocardiography (mitral A wave velocity 34 +/- 17 cm/sec) by 6 months.
CONCLUSION: Catheter ablation of long-lasting persistent AF associated with acute AF termination achieves medium to long-term restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm in 95% of patients. Arrhythmia recurrence in the majority of patients is AT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16302893     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2005.00308.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1045-3873


  131 in total

1.  Ethanol infusion in the vein of Marshall facilitates mitral isthmus ablation.

Authors:  José L Báez-Escudero; Percy Francisco Morales; Amish S Dave; Christine M Sasaridis; Young-Hoon Kim; Kaoru Okishige; Miguel Valderrábano
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 6.343

Review 2.  State-of-the-art and emerging technologies for atrial fibrillation ablation.

Authors:  Jane Dewire; Hugh Calkins
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 32.419

3.  Electrical isolation of the superior vena cava by laser balloon ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Martín R Arceluz; Pedro F Cruz; Estela Falconi; Rosa Montes de Oca; Reina Delgado; Jorge Figueroa; Marta Ortega; José L Merino
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 4.  What Is the Appropriate Lesion Set for Ablation in Patients with Persistent Atrial Fibrillation?

Authors:  Jorge Romero; Carola Gianni; Andrea Natale; Luigi Di Biase
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2017-05

5.  Gaps in the ablation line as a potential cause of recovery from electrical isolation and their visualization using MRI.

Authors:  Ravi Ranjan; Ritsushi Kato; Menekhem M Zviman; Timm M Dickfeld; Ariel Roguin; Ronald D Berger; Gordon F Tomaselli; Henry R Halperin
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2011-04-14

Review 6.  [Current strategies in the treatment of atrial fibrillation].

Authors:  Imke Drewitz; Thomas Rostock; Boris Hoffmann; Daniel Steven; Helge Servatius; Thomas Meinertz; Stephan Willems
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  2008-11-15

7.  Substrate modification by adding ablation of localized complex fractionated electrograms after stepwise linear ablation in persistent atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Shiro Nakahara; Tohru Kamijima; Yuichi Hori; Naofumi Tsukada; Akiko Okano; Kan Takayanagi
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2013-11-30       Impact factor: 1.900

8.  Treatment Complications of Atrial Fibrillation and Their Management.

Authors:  Allan Mattia; Joshua Newman; Frank Manetta
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2020-03-05

Review 9.  [Radiofrequency current or cryoballoon for ablation of atrial fibrillation? : Hot or cold?]

Authors:  B Reissmann; K-H Kuck; A Metzner
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 10.  [Atrial fibrillation ablation: who comes into consideration?].

Authors:  B-D Gonska; H J Bauerle; T Japha
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2009-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.