Literature DB >> 27046577

Fabric Force Sensors for the Clinical Breast Examination Simulator.

Shlomi Laufer1, Kristen Rasske2, Lauren Stopfer2, Clair Kurzynski2, Tim Abbott2, Megan Platner2, Joseph Towles2, Carla M Pugh1.   

Abstract

Sensor enabled simulators may help in training and assessing clinical skill. Their are imitations on the locations current sensors can be placed without interfering with the clinical examination. In this study novel fabric force sensors were developed and tested. These sensors are soft and flexible and undetectable when placed in different locations in the simulator. Five sensors were added to our current sensor enabled breast simulator. Eight participants performed the clinical breast examination on the simulator and documented their findings. There was a significant relationship for both clinical breast examination time (r(6) = 0.99, p < 0.001) and average force (r(6) = 0.92, p < 0.005) between our current sensors and the new fabric sensors. In addition the senors were not noticed by the participants. These new sensors provide new methods to measure and assess clinical skill and performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27046577      PMCID: PMC4924804     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform        ISSN: 0926-9630


  8 in total

1.  Qualitative and quantitative analysis of pressure sensor data acquired by the E-Pelvis simulator during simulated pelvic examinations.

Authors:  Carla M Pugh; Jacob Rosen
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2002

2.  Lost in translation: unfolding medical students' misconceptions of how to perform a clinical digital rectal examination.

Authors:  Rishi Balkissoon; Katherine Blossfield; Lawrence Salud; Debra Ford; Carla Pugh
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  A simulation-based assessment of clinical breast examination technique: do patient and clinician factors affect clinician approach?

Authors:  Carla M Pugh; Zachary B Domont; Lawrence H Salud; Katherine M Blossfield
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Sensor technology in assessments of clinical skill.

Authors:  Shlomi Laufer; Elaine R Cohen; Calvin Kwan; Anne-Lise D D'Angelo; Rachel Yudkowsky; John R Boulet; William C McGaghie; Carla M Pugh
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  Clinical breast examination: practical recommendations for optimizing performance and reporting.

Authors:  Debbie Saslow; Judy Hannan; Janet Osuch; Marianne H Alciati; Cornelia Baines; Mary Barton; Janet Kay Bobo; Cathy Coleman; Mary Dolan; Ginny Gaumer; Daniel Kopans; Susan Kutner; Dorothy S Lane; Herschel Lawson; Helen Meissner; Candace Moorman; Henry Pennypacker; Peggy Pierce; Eva Sciandra; Robert Smith; Ralph Coates
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 508.702

6.  Clinical examination simulation: getting to real.

Authors:  Lawrence H Salud; Chiagozie I Ononye; Calvin Kwan; Jonathan C Salud; Carla M Pugh
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2012

7.  The rational clinical examination. Does this patient have breast cancer? The screening clinical breast examination: should it be done? How?

Authors:  M B Barton; R Harris; S W Fletcher
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-10-06       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Multimodality approach to classifying hand utilization for the clinical breast examination.

Authors:  Shlomi Laufer; Elaine R Cohen; Anne-Lise D Maag; Calvin Kwan; Barry Vanveen; Carla M Pugh
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2014
  8 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  3D Printed Organ Models for Surgical Applications.

Authors:  Kaiyan Qiu; Ghazaleh Haghiashtiani; Michael C McAlpine
Journal:  Annu Rev Anal Chem (Palo Alto Calif)       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 10.745

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.