Literature DB >> 15537576

Clinical breast examination: practical recommendations for optimizing performance and reporting.

Debbie Saslow1, Judy Hannan, Janet Osuch, Marianne H Alciati, Cornelia Baines, Mary Barton, Janet Kay Bobo, Cathy Coleman, Mary Dolan, Ginny Gaumer, Daniel Kopans, Susan Kutner, Dorothy S Lane, Herschel Lawson, Helen Meissner, Candace Moorman, Henry Pennypacker, Peggy Pierce, Eva Sciandra, Robert Smith, Ralph Coates.   

Abstract

Clinical breast examination (CBE) seeks to detect breast abnormalities or evaluate patient reports of symptoms to find palpable breast cancers at an earlier stage of progression. Treatment options for earlier-stage cancers are generally more numerous, include less toxic alternatives, and are usually more effective than treatments for later-stage cancers. For average-risk women aged 40 and younger, earlier detection of palpable tumors identified by CBE can lead to earlier therapy. After age 40, when mammography is recommended, CBE is regarded as an adjunct to mammography. Recent debate, however, has questioned the contributions of CBE to the detection of breast cancer in asymptomatic women and particularly to improved survival and reduced mortality rates. Clinicians remain widely divided about the level of evidence supporting CBE and their confidence in the examination. Yet, CBE is practiced extensively in the United States and continues to be recommended by many leading health organizations. It is in this context that this report provides a brief review of evidence for CBE's role in the earlier detection of breast cancer, highlights current practice issues, and presents recommendations that, when implemented, could contribute to greater standardization of the practice and reporting of CBE. These recommendations may also lead to improved evidence of the nature and extent of CBE's contribution to the earlier detection of breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15537576     DOI: 10.3322/canjclin.54.6.327

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin        ISSN: 0007-9235            Impact factor:   508.702


  27 in total

1.  Detection and description of small breast masses by residents trained using a standardized clinical breast exam curriculum.

Authors:  Elizabeth Steiner; Donald F Austin; Nancy C Prouser
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-12-04       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Pointing the way to informed medical decision making: test characteristics of clinical breast examination.

Authors:  Mary B Barton; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-08-31       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  The clinical breast exam: a skill that should not be abandoned.

Authors:  Teresa Bryan; Erin Snyder
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Improving diagnosis in healthcare: Local versus national adoption of recommended guidelines for the clinical breast examination.

Authors:  Jay N Nathwani; Anna Garren; Shlomi Laufer; Calvin Kwan; Carla M Pugh
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Is clinical breast examination important for breast cancer detection?

Authors:  L Provencher; J C Hogue; C Desbiens; B Poirier; E Poirier; D Boudreau; M Joyal; C Diorio; N Duchesne; J Chiquette
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 3.677

6.  Sensor technology in assessments of clinical skill.

Authors:  Shlomi Laufer; Elaine R Cohen; Calvin Kwan; Anne-Lise D D'Angelo; Rachel Yudkowsky; John R Boulet; William C McGaghie; Carla M Pugh
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Rescuing the Clinical Breast Examination: Advances in Classifying Technique and Assessing Physician Competency.

Authors:  Shlomi Laufer; Anne-Lise D D'Angelo; Calvin Kwan; Rebbeca D Ray; Rachel Yudkowsky; John R Boulet; William C McGaghie; Carla M Pugh
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Multimodality approach to classifying hand utilization for the clinical breast examination.

Authors:  Shlomi Laufer; Elaine R Cohen; Anne-Lise D Maag; Calvin Kwan; Barry Vanveen; Carla M Pugh
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2014

9.  Evaluation of Simulated Clinical Breast Exam Motion Patterns Using Marker-Less Video Tracking.

Authors:  David P Azari; Carla M Pugh; Shlomi Laufer; Calvin Kwan; Chia-Hsiung Chen; Thomas Y Yen; Yu Hen Hu; Robert G Radwin
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 2.888

10.  Mechanical imaging of the breast.

Authors:  Vladimir Egorov; Armen P Sarvazyan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 10.048

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.