Literature DB >> 19324111

Lost in translation: unfolding medical students' misconceptions of how to perform a clinical digital rectal examination.

Rishi Balkissoon1, Katherine Blossfield, Lawrence Salud, Debra Ford, Carla Pugh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Digital rectal examination (DRE) skills are difficult to teach and assess. This study sought to assess the construct validity of newly developed DRE simulators, which were then used to evaluate DRE palpation techniques and accuracy based on experience.
METHODS: Medical students (n = 30), residents (n = 24), and experienced clinicians (n = 24) performed clinical DREs on the simulators and documented their findings. During the examinations, computer-generated quantitative performance data were collected.
RESULTS: Students focused more on pronating and supinating their examining finger in the rectum. In addition, students were less accurate when assessing the prostate gland compared with experienced clinicians and residents (students = 33%, residents = 64%, and clinicians = 76%; P <.05.
CONCLUSIONS: The DRE simulators were useful in defining specific differences in clinical DRE palpation techniques based on experience. We believe the observed differences are largely caused by students' misconceptions about how to perform the DRE.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19324111     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.11.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  14 in total

1.  Idle time: an underdeveloped performance metric for assessing surgical skill.

Authors:  Anne-Lise D D'Angelo; Drew N Rutherford; Rebecca D Ray; Shlomi Laufer; Calvin Kwan; Elaine R Cohen; Andrea Mason; Carla M Pugh
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Family medicine residents' training in, knowledge about, and perceptions of digital rectal examination.

Authors:  Annick Bussières; Alexandre Bouchard; David Simonyan; Sebastien Drolet
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Anatomical basis of digital rectal examination.

Authors:  E Joguet; R Robert; J J Labat; T Riant; M Guérineau; O Hamel; J M Louppe
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2011-06-04       Impact factor: 1.246

4.  A survey of digital rectal examination training in Canadian medical schools.

Authors:  Alysha Nensi; Nilesh Chande
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.522

5.  Characterizing touch using pressure data and auto regressive models.

Authors:  Shlomi Laufer; Carla M Pugh; Barry D Van Veen
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2014

6.  Rescuing the Clinical Breast Examination: Advances in Classifying Technique and Assessing Physician Competency.

Authors:  Shlomi Laufer; Anne-Lise D D'Angelo; Calvin Kwan; Rebbeca D Ray; Rachel Yudkowsky; John R Boulet; William C McGaghie; Carla M Pugh
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Sensor-based assessment of cast placement and removal.

Authors:  Anne-Lise D Maag; Shlomi Laufer; Calvin Kwan; Elaine R Cohen; Rachel L Lenhart; Natalie C Stork; Matthew A Halanski; Carla M Pugh
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2014

8.  Multimodality approach to classifying hand utilization for the clinical breast examination.

Authors:  Shlomi Laufer; Elaine R Cohen; Anne-Lise D Maag; Calvin Kwan; Barry Vanveen; Carla M Pugh
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2014

Review 9.  Application of national testing standards to simulation-based assessments of clinical palpation skills.

Authors:  Carla M Pugh
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.437

10.  Fabric Force Sensors for the Clinical Breast Examination Simulator.

Authors:  Shlomi Laufer; Kristen Rasske; Lauren Stopfer; Clair Kurzynski; Tim Abbott; Megan Platner; Joseph Towles; Carla M Pugh
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2016
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.