Literature DB >> 27044080

The effect of gene interactions on the long-term response to selection.

Tiago Paixão1, Nicholas H Barton2.   

Abstract

The role of gene interactions in the evolutionary process has long been controversial. Although some argue that they are not of importance, because most variation is additive, others claim that their effect in the long term can be substantial. Here, we focus on the long-term effects of genetic interactions under directional selection assuming no mutation or dominance, and that epistasis is symmetrical overall. We ask by how much the mean of a complex trait can be increased by selection and analyze two extreme regimes, in which either drift or selection dominate the dynamics of allele frequencies. In both scenarios, epistatic interactions affect the long-term response to selection by modulating the additive genetic variance. When drift dominates, we extend Robertson's [Robertson A (1960)Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci153(951):234-249] argument to show that, for any form of epistasis, the total response of a haploid population is proportional to the initial total genotypic variance. In contrast, the total response of a diploid population is increased by epistasis, for a given initial genotypic variance. When selection dominates, we show that the total selection response can only be increased by epistasis when some initially deleterious alleles become favored as the genetic background changes. We find a simple approximation for this effect and show that, in this regime, it is the structure of the genotype-phenotype map that matters and not the variance components of the population.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adaptation; epistasis; genetic drift; genetic variance

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27044080      PMCID: PMC4843425          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1518830113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  23 in total

1.  The correlation between relatives in a random mating population.

Authors:  O KEMPTHORNE
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1954-12-15

2.  Effects of genetic drift on variance components under a general model of epistasis.

Authors:  N H Barton; Michael Turelli
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Epistasis in monkeyflowers.

Authors:  John K Kelly
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-06-08       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Prediction of effects of genetic drift on variance components under a general model of epistasis.

Authors:  William G Hill; Nicholas H Barton; Michael Turelli
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2005-12-19       Impact factor: 1.570

5.  Epistatic buffering of fitness loss in yeast double deletion strains.

Authors:  Lukasz Jasnos; Ryszard Korona
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2007-02-25       Impact factor: 38.330

6.  A defense of beanbag genetics. 1964.

Authors:  J B S Haldane
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 7.196

7.  Factors affecting the genetic load in Drosophila: synergistic epistasis and correlations among fitness components.

Authors:  M C Whitlock; D Bourguet
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 8.  Epistasis--the essential role of gene interactions in the structure and evolution of genetic systems.

Authors:  Patrick C Phillips
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 9.  Finding the missing heritability of complex diseases.

Authors:  Teri A Manolio; Francis S Collins; Nancy J Cox; David B Goldstein; Lucia A Hindorff; David J Hunter; Mark I McCarthy; Erin M Ramos; Lon R Cardon; Aravinda Chakravarti; Judy H Cho; Alan E Guttmacher; Augustine Kong; Leonid Kruglyak; Elaine Mardis; Charles N Rotimi; Montgomery Slatkin; David Valle; Alice S Whittemore; Michael Boehnke; Andrew G Clark; Evan E Eichler; Greg Gibson; Jonathan L Haines; Trudy F C Mackay; Steven A McCarroll; Peter M Visscher
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-10-08       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 10.  Data and theory point to mainly additive genetic variance for complex traits.

Authors:  William G Hill; Michael E Goddard; Peter M Visscher
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2008-02-29       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  17 in total

1.  Homeologous Epistasis in Wheat: The Search for an Immortal Hybrid.

Authors:  Nicholas Santantonio; Jean-Luc Jannink; Mark Sorrells
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Weak Epistasis May Drive Adaptation in Recombining Bacteria.

Authors:  Brian J Arnold; Michael U Gutmann; Yonatan H Grad; Samuel K Sheppard; Jukka Corander; Marc Lipsitch; William P Hanage
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Genome-wide signatures of synergistic epistasis during parallel adaptation in a Baltic Sea copepod.

Authors:  David B Stern; Nathan W Anderson; Juanita A Diaz; Carol Eunmi Lee
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 17.694

4.  Association analysis of loci implied in "buffering" epistasis.

Authors:  Antonio Reverter; Zulma G Vitezica; Marina Naval-Sánchez; John Henshall; Fernanda S S Raidan; Yutao Li; Karin Meyer; Nicholas J Hudson; Laercio R Porto-Neto; Andrés Legarra
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  How does epistasis influence the response to selection?

Authors:  N H Barton
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  Epistasis in a Fitness Landscape Defined by Antibody-Antigen Binding Free Energy.

Authors:  Rhys M Adams; Justin B Kinney; Aleksandra M Walczak; Thierry Mora
Journal:  Cell Syst       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 11.091

7.  Detection of Epistasis for Flowering Time Using Bayesian Multilocus Estimation in a Barley MAGIC Population.

Authors:  Boby Mathew; Jens Léon; Wiebke Sannemann; Mikko J Sillanpää
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Influence of epistasis on response to genomic selection using complete sequence data.

Authors:  Natalia S Forneris; Zulma G Vitezica; Andres Legarra; Miguel Pérez-Enciso
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 4.297

9.  Accounting for genetic interactions improves modeling of individual quantitative trait phenotypes in yeast.

Authors:  Simon K G Forsberg; Joshua S Bloom; Meru J Sadhu; Leonid Kruglyak; Örjan Carlborg
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  Perspectives on Applications of Hierarchical Gene-To-Phenotype (G2P) Maps to Capture Non-stationary Effects of Alleles in Genomic Prediction.

Authors:  Owen M Powell; Kai P Voss-Fels; David R Jordan; Graeme Hammer; Mark Cooper
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 5.753

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.