Literature DB >> 17322879

Epistatic buffering of fitness loss in yeast double deletion strains.

Lukasz Jasnos1, Ryszard Korona.   

Abstract

Interactions between deleterious mutations have been insufficiently studied, despite the fact that their strength and direction are critical for understanding the evolution of genetic recombination and the buildup of mutational load in populations. We compiled a list of 758 yeast gene deletions causing growth defects (from the Munich Information Center for Protein Sequences database and ref. 7). Using BY4741 and BY4742 single-deletion strains, we carried out 639 random crosses and assayed growth curves of the resulting progeny. We show that the maximum growth rate averaged over strains lacking deletions and those with double deletions is higher than that of strains with single deletions, indicating a positive epistatic effect. This tendency is shared by genes belonging to a variety of functional classes. Based on our data and former theoretical work, we suggest that epistasis is likely to diminish the negative effects of mutations when the ability to produce biomass at high rates contributes significantly to fitness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17322879     DOI: 10.1038/ng1986

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Genet        ISSN: 1061-4036            Impact factor:   38.330


  64 in total

1.  Introduction to focus issue: genetic interactions.

Authors:  Daniel Segrè; Christopher J Marx
Journal:  Chaos       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.642

2.  Quantitative analysis of fitness and genetic interactions in yeast on a genome scale.

Authors:  Anastasia Baryshnikova; Michael Costanzo; Yungil Kim; Huiming Ding; Judice Koh; Kiana Toufighi; Ji-Young Youn; Jiongwen Ou; Bryan-Joseph San Luis; Sunayan Bandyopadhyay; Matthew Hibbs; David Hess; Anne-Claude Gingras; Gary D Bader; Olga G Troyanskaya; Grant W Brown; Brenda Andrews; Charles Boone; Chad L Myers
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2010-11-14       Impact factor: 28.547

3.  Simulations reveal challenges to artificial community selection and possible strategies for success.

Authors:  Li Xie; Alex E Yuan; Wenying Shou
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 8.029

4.  Defining genetic interaction.

Authors:  Ramamurthy Mani; Robert P St Onge; John L Hartman; Guri Giaever; Frederick P Roth
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Evolution can favor antagonistic epistasis.

Authors:  Michael M Desai; Daniel Weissman; Marcus W Feldman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-08-24       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  The evolution of epistasis and its links with genetic robustness, complexity and drift in a phenotypic model of adaptation.

Authors:  Pierre-Alexis Gros; Hervé Le Nagard; Olivier Tenaillon
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Interactions between stressful environment and gene deletions alleviate the expected average loss of fitness in yeast.

Authors:  Lukasz Jasnos; Katarzyna Tomala; Dorota Paczesniak; Ryszard Korona
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 8.  Experimental genomics of fitness in yeast.

Authors:  Graham Bell
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  A systems analysis of mutational effects in HIV-1 protease and reverse transcriptase.

Authors:  Trevor Hinkley; João Martins; Colombe Chappey; Mojgan Haddad; Eric Stawiski; Jeannette M Whitcomb; Christos J Petropoulos; Sebastian Bonhoeffer
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2011-03-27       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 10.  Drug interactions and the evolution of antibiotic resistance.

Authors:  Pamela J Yeh; Matthew J Hegreness; Aviva Presser Aiden; Roy Kishony
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 60.633

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.