Ha Son Nguyen1, Ninh Doan1, Saman Shabani1, Jamie Baisden1, Christopher Wolfla1, Glenn Paskoff2, Barry Shender2, Brian Stemper3. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Wisconsin, USA. 2. Naval Air Warfare Center, Aircraft Division, Patuxent River, Maryland, USA. 3. Department of Neurosurgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Wisconsin, USA; Clement J. Zablocki VA Medical Center, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Lumbar back pain and radiculopathy are common diagnoses. Unfortunately, conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings and clinical symptoms do not necessarily correlate in the lumbar spine. With upright imaging, disc pathologies or foraminal stenosis may become more salient, leading to improvements in diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventeen adults (10 asymptomatic and 7 symptomatic volunteers) provided their informed consent and participated in the study. A 0.6T upright MRI scan was performed on each adult in the seated position. Parameters were obtained from the L2/3 level to the L5/S1 level including those pertaining to the foramen [cross-sectional area (CSA), height, mid-disc width, width, thickness of ligamentum flavum], disc (bulge, height, width), vertebral body (height and width), and alignment (lordosis angle, wedge angle, lumbosacral angle). Each parameter was compared based on the spinal level and volunteer group using two-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA). Bonferroni post hoc analysis was used to assess the differences between individual spinal levels. RESULTS: Mid-disc width accounted for 56% of maximum foramen width in symptomatic volunteers and over 63% in asymptomatic volunteers. Disc bulge was 48% greater in symptomatic volunteers compared to asymptomatic volunteers. CSA was generally smaller in symptomatic volunteers compared to asymptomatic volunteers, particularly at the L4-L5 and L5-S1 spinal levels. Thickness of ligamentum flavum (TLF) generally increased from the cranial to caudal spinal levels where the L4-L5 and L5-S1 spinal levels were significantly thicker than the L1-L2 spinal level. CONCLUSIONS: The data implied that upright MRI could be a useful diagnostic option, as it can delineate pertinent differences between symptomatic volunteers and asymptomatic volunteers, especially with respect to foraminal geometry.
BACKGROUND:Lumbar back pain and radiculopathy are common diagnoses. Unfortunately, conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings and clinical symptoms do not necessarily correlate in the lumbar spine. With upright imaging, disc pathologies or foraminal stenosis may become more salient, leading to improvements in diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventeen adults (10 asymptomatic and 7 symptomatic volunteers) provided their informed consent and participated in the study. A 0.6T upright MRI scan was performed on each adult in the seated position. Parameters were obtained from the L2/3 level to the L5/S1 level including those pertaining to the foramen [cross-sectional area (CSA), height, mid-disc width, width, thickness of ligamentum flavum], disc (bulge, height, width), vertebral body (height and width), and alignment (lordosis angle, wedge angle, lumbosacral angle). Each parameter was compared based on the spinal level and volunteer group using two-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA). Bonferroni post hoc analysis was used to assess the differences between individual spinal levels. RESULTS: Mid-disc width accounted for 56% of maximum foramen width in symptomatic volunteers and over 63% in asymptomatic volunteers. Disc bulge was 48% greater in symptomatic volunteers compared to asymptomatic volunteers. CSA was generally smaller in symptomatic volunteers compared to asymptomatic volunteers, particularly at the L4-L5 and L5-S1 spinal levels. Thickness of ligamentum flavum (TLF) generally increased from the cranial to caudal spinal levels where the L4-L5 and L5-S1 spinal levels were significantly thicker than the L1-L2 spinal level. CONCLUSIONS: The data implied that upright MRI could be a useful diagnostic option, as it can delineate pertinent differences between symptomatic volunteers and asymptomatic volunteers, especially with respect to foraminal geometry.
Entities:
Keywords:
Foraminal stenosis; lumbar back pain; lumbar radiculopathy; magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); upright MRI
Authors: John W Gilbert; J Chad Martin; Greg R Wheeler; Benjamin B Storey; Gregory E Mick; Gay B Richardson; Stephanie L Herder; Kwadwo Gyarteng-Dakwa; Patricia G Broughton Journal: J Manipulative Physiol Ther Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 1.437
Authors: A A Zamani; T Moriarty; L Hsu; C S Winalski; J L Schaffer; H Isbister; J F Schenck; K W Rohling; F Jolesz Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 1998 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Timothy B Neuschwander; John Cutrone; Brandon R Macias; Samantha Cutrone; Gita Murthy; Henry Chambers; Alan R Hargens Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2010-01-01 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: A Dimitriadis; F Smith; A F Mavrogenis; M H Pope; P J Papagelopoulos; A Karantanas; A Hadjipavlou; P Katonis Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2011-11-17 Impact factor: 3.469
Authors: Christopher Centeno; Jason Markle; Ehren Dodson; Ian Stemper; Christopher J Williams; Matthew Hyzy; Thomas Ichim; Michael Freeman Journal: J Transl Med Date: 2017-09-22 Impact factor: 5.531