Literature DB >> 20023607

The effect of backpacks on the lumbar spine in children: a standing magnetic resonance imaging study.

Timothy B Neuschwander1, John Cutrone, Brandon R Macias, Samantha Cutrone, Gita Murthy, Henry Chambers, Alan R Hargens.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: This study is a repeated measures design to measure the lumbar spine response to typical school backpack loads in healthy children. The lumbar spine in this setting was measured for the first time by an upright magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to measure the lumbar spine response to typical school backpack loads in healthy children. We hypothesize that backpack loads significantly increase disc compression and lumbar curvature. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Children commonly carry school backpacks of 10% to 22% bodyweight. Despite growing concern among parents about safety, there are no imaging studies which describe the effect of backpack loads on the spine in children.
METHODS: Three boys and 5 girls, age 11 +/- 2 years (mean +/- SD) underwent T2 weighted sagittal and coronal MRI scans of the lumbar spine while standing. Scans were repeated with 4, 8, and 12 kg backpack loads, which represented approximately 10%, 20%, and 30% body weight for our sample. Main outcome measures were disc compression, defined as post- minus preloading disc height, and lumbar asymmetry, defined as the coronal Cobb angle between the superior endplates of S1 and L1.
RESULTS: Increasing backpack loads significantly compressed lumbar disc heights measured in the midline sagittal plane (P < 0.05, repeated-measures analysis of variance [ANOVA]). Lumbar asymmetry was: 2.23 degrees +/- 1.07 degrees standing, 5.46 degrees +/- 2.50 degrees with 4 kg, 9.18 degrees +/- 2.25 degrees with 8 kg, and 5.68 degrees +/- 1.76 degrees with 12 kg (mean +/- SE). Backpack loads significantly increased lumbar asymmetry (P < 0.03, one-way ANOVA). Four of the 8 subjects had Cobb angles greater than 10 degrees during 8-kg backpack loads. Using a visual-analogue scale to rate their pain (0-no pain, 10-worst pain imaginable), subjects reported significant increases in back pain associated with backpack loads of 4, 8, and 12 kg (P < 0.001, 1-way ANOVA).
CONCLUSION: Backpack loads are responsible for a significant amount of back pain in children, which in part, may be due to changes in lumbar disc height or curvature. This is the first upright MRI study to document reduced disc height and greater lumbar asymmetry for common backpack loads in children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20023607     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b21a5d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  17 in total

1.  Incorporating Six Degree-of-Freedom Intervertebral Joint Stiffness in a Lumbar Spine Musculoskeletal Model-Method and Performance in Flexed Postures.

Authors:  Xiangjie Meng; Alexander G Bruno; Bo Cheng; Wenjun Wang; Mary L Bouxsein; Dennis E Anderson
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  High precision semiautomated computed tomography measurement of lumbar disk and vertebral heights.

Authors:  Sovira Tan; Jianhua Yao; Lawrence Yao; Michael M Ward
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Body posture and backpack loading: an upright magnetic resonance imaging study of the adult lumbar spine.

Authors:  Stephen Shymon; Alan R Hargens; Lawrence A Minkoff; Douglas G Chang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Musculoskeletal full-body models including a detailed thoracolumbar spine for children and adolescents aged 6-18 years.

Authors:  Stefan Schmid; Katelyn A Burkhart; Brett T Allaire; Daniel Grindle; Dennis E Anderson
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Altered disc compression in children with idiopathic low back pain: an upright magnetic resonance imaging backpack study.

Authors:  Stephen J Shymon; Burt Yaszay; Jerry R Dwek; James A Proudfoot; Michael Donohue; Alan R Hargens
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  External pneumatic compression device prevents fainting in standing weight-bearing MRI: a cohort study.

Authors:  Bjarke B Hansen; Rasmus Bouert; Henning Bliddal; Robin Christensen; Tom Bendix; Anders Christensen; Jesper Mehlsen; Zoreh Rasti; Mikael Boesen
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Upright magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine: Back pain and radiculopathy.

Authors:  Ha Son Nguyen; Ninh Doan; Saman Shabani; Jamie Baisden; Christopher Wolfla; Glenn Paskoff; Barry Shender; Brian Stemper
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar

8.  Back pain and its risk factors in Brazilian adolescents: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Matias Noll; Cláudia Tarragô Candotti; Bruna Nichele da Rosa; Adriane Vieira; Jefferson Fagundes Loss
Journal:  Br J Pain       Date:  2019-08-20

9.  Lumbar Spine Paraspinal Muscle and Intervertebral Disc Height Changes in Astronauts After Long-Duration Spaceflight on the International Space Station.

Authors:  Douglas G Chang; Robert M Healey; Alexander J Snyder; Jojo V Sayson; Brandon R Macias; Dezba G Coughlin; Jeannie F Bailey; Scott E Parazynski; Jeffrey C Lotz; Alan R Hargens
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 3.241

10.  Monitoring the prevalence of postural changes in schoolchildren.

Authors:  Bruna Nichele da Rosa; Matias Noll; Juliana Adami Sedrez; Tassia Silveira Furlanetto; Claudia Tarrago Candotti
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2016-02-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.