Literature DB >> 33489488

Weight-Bearing Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Diagnostic Tool That Generates Biomechanical Changes in Spine Anatomy.

Brian Fiani1, Daniel W Griepp2, Jason Lee3, Cyrus Davati3, Christina M Moawad4, Athanasios Kondilis5.   

Abstract

Weight-bearing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a unique modality in diagnostic imaging that allows for the assessment of spinal pathology in ways considered previously inaccessible or insufficient with the conventional MRI technique. Due to limitations in positioning within the MRI machine itself, difficulties would be posed in determining the underlying cause of a patient's pain or neurological symptoms, as the traditional supine position utilized can, in many cases, alleviate the severity of presented symptoms. Weight-bearing MRI addresses this concern by allowing a clinician to position a patient (to a certain degree) into flexion, extension, rotation, or side-bending with an axial load that can mimic physiologic conditions in order to replicate the conditions the patient experiences in order to give clinicians a clearer understanding of the anatomical relationship of the spine and surrounding tissues that may lead to a particular presentation of symptoms. These findings can then guide treatment approaches that are better tailored to a patient's needs in order to initiate treatment earlier and shorten the duration of treatment necessary for patient benefit. The goal of this review is to describe and differentiate weight-bearing MRI from conventional MRI as well as examine the advantages and disadvantages of either imaging modality. This will include assessing cost-effectiveness and improvements in clinical outcomes. Further, the advancements of weight-bearing MRI will be discussed, including potentially unique clinical applications in development.
Copyright © 2020, Fiani et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  axial loading; clinical efficacy; cost effectiveness; dynamic mri; neuroradiology; spinal stenosis; spine imaging; spondylosis; upright mri; weight bearing mri

Year:  2020        PMID: 33489488      PMCID: PMC7805418          DOI: 10.7759/cureus.12070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cureus        ISSN: 2168-8184


  46 in total

Review 1.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the weight-bearing spine.

Authors:  Dominik Weishaupt; Larissa Boxheimer
Journal:  Semin Musculoskelet Radiol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.777

2.  Positional MRI changes in supine versus sitting postures in patients with degenerative lumbar spine.

Authors:  Efthimios J Karadimas; Manal Siddiqui; Francis W Smith; Douglas Wardlaw
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2006-10

3.  The narrowing of the lumbar spinal canal during loaded MRI: the effects of the disc and ligamentum flavum.

Authors:  Tommy Hansson; Nobuyuki Suzuki; Hanna Hebelka; Arne Gaulitz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Diagnostic capability of low- versus high-field magnetic resonance imaging for lumbar degenerative disease.

Authors:  Ryan K L Lee; James F Griffith; Yvonne Y O Lau; Joyce H Y Leung; Alex W H Ng; Esther H Y Hung; S W Law
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2015-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Conventional Supine MRI With a Lumbar Pillow-An Alternative to Weight-bearing MRI for Diagnosing Spinal Stenosis?: A Cross-sectional Study.

Authors:  Bjarke Brandt Hansen; Philip Hansen; Jacob Grindsted; Zoreh Rasti; Henning Bliddal; Robert G C Riis; Mikael Boesen
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Successful visualization of dynamic change of lumbar nerve root compression with the patient in both upright and prone positions using dynamic digital tomosynthesis-radiculography in patients with lumbar foraminal stenosis: An initial report of three cases.

Authors:  Kentaro Mataki; Masao Koda; Yosuke Shibao; Hiroshi Kumagai; Katsuya Nagashima; Kousei Miura; Hiroshi Noguchi; Toru Funayama; Tetsuya Abe; Masashi Yamazaki
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 1.961

7.  Open stand-up MRI: a new instrument for positional neuroimaging.

Authors:  John W Gilbert; Greg R Wheeler; Richard A Lingreen; Robert R Johnson
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2006-04

8.  The effect of body position and axial load on spinal canal morphology: an MRI study of central spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Rasmus Madsen; Tue Secher Jensen; Malcolm Pope; Joan Solgaard Sørensen; Tom Bendix
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Evaluation of intervertebral disc herniation and hypermobile intersegmental instability in symptomatic adult patients undergoing recumbent and upright MRI of the cervical or lumbosacral spines.

Authors:  Antonio Ferreiro Perez; Millan Garcia Isidro; Elena Ayerbe; Julio Castedo; J R Jinkins
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2007-04-06       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 10.  Cost Effectiveness of Mobile versus Fixed Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Marita Mohammadshahi; Minoo Alipouri Sakha; Atefeh Esfandiari; Maryam Shirvani; Ali Akbari Sari
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.429

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.