Literature DB >> 21036285

Lumbar disk protrusion rates of symptomatic patients using magnetic resonance imaging.

John W Gilbert1, J Chad Martin, Greg R Wheeler, Benjamin B Storey, Gregory E Mick, Gay B Richardson, Stephanie L Herder, Kwadwo Gyarteng-Dakwa, Patricia G Broughton.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the rate of disk protrusions detected via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients symptomatic for spine pain, radiculopathy, or other spine-related pain.
METHODS: A retrospective review of 1983 MRI scans was performed over a 2-year period on 1486 patients, each of whom was symptomatic for spine pain, radiculopathy, or other noncancer, spine-related pain. Of these patients, 761 were scanned in the recumbent position using low-field (0.3 T, Airis II, Hitachi, Twinsburg, Ohio) MRI, and 725 were scanned in an upright, sitting position using mid-field (0.6 T) open Upright MRI (Fonar, Melville, NY). In total, 986 serial scans were performed on patients in the recumbent position and 997 serial scans on patients in the weight-bearing position.
RESULTS: One or more disk protrusions were identified in 73.3% of scans performed in the sitting position and in 50.1% of scans performed in the recumbent position. Most disk protrusions occurred at L5-S1 (52.3% and 29.8%), L4-L5 (42.6% and 26.7%), and L3-L4 (26.7% and 13.1%) in upright and recumbent positions, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The disk protrusion rate in this group of patients ranged between 50.1% (recumbent) and 73.3% (weight-bearing). These rates are higher than rates reported in the medical literature for asymptomatic patients, a finding that supports the decision to further evaluate patients with persistent spine-related pain.
Copyright © 2010 National University of Health Sciences. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21036285     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2010.08.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther        ISSN: 0161-4754            Impact factor:   1.437


  7 in total

1.  Dynamic motion characteristics of the lower lumbar spine: implication to lumbar pathology and surgical treatment.

Authors:  Minfei Wu; Shaobai Wang; Sean J Driscoll; Thomas D Cha; Kirkham B Wood; Guoan Li
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Effects of spine loading in a patient with post-decompression lumbar disc herniation: observations using an open weight-bearing MRI.

Authors:  Niladri Kumar Mahato; Daryl Sybert; Tim Law; Brian Clark
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Upright magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine: Back pain and radiculopathy.

Authors:  Ha Son Nguyen; Ninh Doan; Saman Shabani; Jamie Baisden; Christopher Wolfla; Glenn Paskoff; Barry Shender; Brian Stemper
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar

4.  Accuracy of physical examination for chronic lumbar radiculopathy.

Authors:  Trond Iversen; Tore K Solberg; Bertil Romner; Tom Wilsgaard; Øystein Nygaard; Knut Waterloo; Jens Ivar Brox; Tor Ingebrigtsen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  In vivo morphological features of human lumbar discs.

Authors:  Weiye Zhong; Sean J Driscoll; Minfei Wu; Shaobai Wang; Zhan Liu; Thomas D Cha; Kirkham B Wood; Guoan Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  In vivo dynamic motion characteristics of the lower lumbar spine: L4-5 lumbar degenerative disc diseases undergoing unilateral or bilateral pedicle screw fixation combined with TLIF.

Authors:  Tao Nie; De-Jian Chen; Benyu Tang; Quanwei Song; Xuqiang Liu; Bin Zhang; Min Dai; Guoan Li; Zongmiao Wan
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 2.359

7.  The Essence of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Lumbar Disc Herniation, 2021: 3. Diagnosis.

Authors:  Takashi Kaito; Yu Yamato
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2022-07-27
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.