Literature DB >> 27037699

Development of Plain Language Supplemental Materials for the Biobank Informed Consent Process.

Bettina F Drake1,2, Katherine M Brown3, Sarah Gehlert3,4, Leslie E Wolf5, Joann Seo3, Hannah Perkins3, Melody S Goodman3,4, Kimberly A Kaphingst6,7.   

Abstract

The US Department of Health and Human Services addresses clear communication in the informed consent process as part of the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for revisions to the Common Rule. However, prior research has shown that participants may not fully comprehend research studies despite completion of an informed consent process. Our main goal was to provide plain language information about donation processes to a cancer biobank to supplement an informed consent form. We developed and conducted cognitive testing with supplemental brochures that clearly communicated information about three different models for consent (notice, broad and study-specific) to future use of biospecimens. During the brochure development process, we conducted qualitative, semi-structured, individual, in-person cognitive interviews among 14 women to examine participants' perceptions of the brochures. Each participant provided feedback regarding the understandability, graphics and layout, and cultural appropriateness of the brochures. Our findings demonstrate that these methods may be used to tailor consent form brochures, such as the ones developed here, to other populations. This study therefore adds to our understanding of how best to present content to help women from two different racial groups make informed decisions about participation in a cancer biobank.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biorepository; Cancer; Consent models; Minority; Plain language

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27037699      PMCID: PMC5047847          DOI: 10.1007/s13187-016-1029-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Educ        ISSN: 0885-8195            Impact factor:   2.037


  37 in total

Review 1.  Interventions for individuals with low health literacy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Stacey L Sheridan; David J Halpern; Anthony J Viera; Nancy D Berkman; Katrina E Donahue; Karen Crotty
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2011

Review 2.  The social and ethical issues of post-genomic human biobanks.

Authors:  Anne Cambon-Thomsen
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  Research with stored biological samples: what do research participants want?

Authors:  Donna T Chen; Donald L Rosenstein; Palaniappan Muthappan; Susan G Hilsenbeck; Franklin G Miller; Ezekiel J Emanuel; David Wendler
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2005-03-28

4.  Formative research on perceptions of biobanking: what community members think.

Authors:  John S Luque; Gwendolyn P Quinn; Francisco A Montel-Ishino; Mariana Arevalo; Shalanda A Bynum; Shalewa Noel-Thomas; Kristen J Wells; Clement K Gwede; Cathy D Meade
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  Identification of differentially expressed genes in breast tumors from African American compared with Caucasian women.

Authors:  Lori A Field; Brad Love; Brenda Deyarmin; Jeffrey A Hooke; Craig D Shriver; Rachel E Ellsworth
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  A pilot study of simple interventions to improve informed consent in clinical research: feasibility, approach, and results.

Authors:  Nancy E Kass; Holly A Taylor; Joseph Ali; Kristina Hallez; Lelia Chaisson
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 2.486

7.  Improving informed consent: pilot of a decision aid for women invited to participate in a breast cancer prevention trial (IBIS-II DCIS).

Authors:  I Juraskova; P Butow; A Lopez; M Seccombe; A Coates; F Boyle; N McCarthy; L Reaby; J F Forbes
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.377

8.  Informing the uninformed: optimizing the consent message using a fractional factorial design.

Authors:  Alan R Tait; Terri Voepel-Lewis; Vijayan N Nair; Naveen N Narisetty; Angela Fagerlin
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 16.193

9.  Closing the loop: physician communication with diabetic patients who have low health literacy.

Authors:  Dean Schillinger; John Piette; Kevin Grumbach; Frances Wang; Clifford Wilson; Carolyn Daher; Krishelle Leong-Grotz; Cesar Castro; Andrew B Bindman
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2003-01-13

10.  Developing a simplified consent form for biobanking.

Authors:  Laura M Beskow; Joëlle Y Friedman; N Chantelle Hardy; Li Lin; Kevin P Weinfurt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  9 in total

1.  Translation and adaptation of skin cancer genomic risk education materials for implementation in primary care.

Authors:  Vivian M Rodríguez; Erika Robers; Kate Zielaskowski; C Javier González; Keith Hunley; Kimberly A Kaphingst; Dolores D Guest; Andrew Sussman; Kirsten A Meyer White; Matthew R Schwartz; Jennie Greb; Yvonne Talamantes; Jessica Bigney; Marianne Berwick; Jennifer L Hay
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2016-12-06

2.  Consent to a Postmortem Tissue Procurement Study: Distinguishing Family Decision Makers' Knowledge of the Genotype-Tissue Expression Project.

Authors:  Laura A Siminoff; Maureen Wilson-Genderson; Heather M Gardiner; Maghboeba Mosavel; Kathryn Laura Barker
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 2.300

3.  Race, Trust in Doctors, Privacy Concerns, and Consent Preferences for Biobanks.

Authors:  Soo Jung Hong; Bettina Drake; Melody Goodman; Kimberly A Kaphingst
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2019-06-05

4.  Standard Versus Simplified Consent Materials for Biobank Participation: Differences in Patient Knowledge and Trial Accrual.

Authors:  Sarah B Garrett; Marie Murphy; James Wiley; Daniel Dohan
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 1.978

5.  Biobanking in Israel 2016-17; expressed perceptions versus real life enrollment.

Authors:  Gideon Koren; Daniella Beller; Daphna Laifenfeld; Iris Grossman; Varda Shalev
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 2.652

6.  Ethical Considerations Related to Return of Results from Genomic Medicine Projects: The eMERGE Network (Phase III) Experience.

Authors:  Robyn Fossey; David Kochan; Erin Winkler; Joel E Pacyna; Janet Olson; Stephen Thibodeau; John J Connolly; Margaret Harr; Meckenzie A Behr; Cynthia A Prows; Beth Cobb; Melanie F Myers; Nancy D Leslie; Bahram Namjou-Khales; Hila Milo Rasouly; Julia Wynn; Alexander Fedotov; Wendy K Chung; Ali Gharavi; Janet L Williams; Lynn Pais; Ingrid Holm; Sharon Aufox; Maureen E Smith; Aaron Scrol; Kathleen Leppig; Gail P Jarvik; Georgia L Wiesner; Rongling Li; Mary Stroud; Jordan W Smoller; Richard R Sharp; Iftikhar J Kullo
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2018-01-03

7.  Health websites on COVID-19: are they readable and credible enough to help public self-care?

Authors:  Saeideh Valizadeh-Haghi; Yasser Khazaal; Shahabedin Rahmatizadeh
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2021-01-01

8.  Communicating Risks and Benefits in Informed Consent for Research: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Lika Nusbaum; Brenda Douglas; Karla Damus; Michael Paasche-Orlow; Neenah Estrella-Luna
Journal:  Glob Qual Nurs Res       Date:  2017-09-20

9.  How Semantics Connotations May Influence Concerns About Donation of Biospecimens.

Authors:  Stacey A Page; Beverly Anne Collisson; Jenny Godley; Danny Nguyen; Luanne Metz; Daniel Muruve
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 2.256

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.