Literature DB >> 27037428

Epidemiology of periprosthetic femoral fractures in 5417 revision total hip arthroplasties: a 40-year experience.

M P Abdel1, M T Houdek1, C D Watts1, D G Lewallen1, D J Berry1.   

Abstract

AIMS: The goals of this study were to define the risk factors, characteristics, and chronology of fractures in 5417 revision total hip arthroplasties (THAs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: From our hospital's prospectively collected database we identified all patients who had undergone a revision THA between 1969 and 2011 which involved the femoral stem. The patients' medical records and radiographs were examined and the relevant data extracted. Post-operative periprosthetic fractures were classified using the Vancouver system. A total of 5417 revision THAs were identified.
RESULTS: There were 668 intra-operative fractures, giving an incidence of 12%. Fractures were three times more common with uncemented stems (19%) than with cemented stems (6%) (p < 0.001). The incidence of intra-operative femoral fracture varied by uncemented stem type: fully-coated (20%); proximally-coated (19%); modular fluted tapered (16%) (p < 0.05). Most fractures occurred during the insertion of the femoral component (35%). One-third involved the diaphysis and 26% were of the calcar: 69% were undisplaced. There were 281 post-operative fractures of the femur (20-year probability = 11%). There was no difference in risk for cemented and uncemented stems. Post-operative fractures were more common in men < 70 years (p = 0.02). Periprosthetic fractures occurred earlier after uncemented revision of the femoral component, but later after a cemented revision. The most common fracture type was a Vancouver B1 (31%). Of all post-operative fractures, 24% underwent open reduction and internal fixation and 15% revision arthroplasty.
CONCLUSION: In revision THA, intra-operative fractures occurred three times more often with an uncemented stem. Many were undisplaced diaphyseal fractures treated with cerclage fixation. While the risk of post-operative fracture is similar between uncemented and cemented components, they occur at notably different times depending on the type of stem fixation. TAKE HOME MESSAGE: In revision THA, intra-operative periprosthetic femoral fractures occur three times more often with uncemented stems. Many are non-displaced diaphyseal fractures treated with cerclage fixation. While postoperative fracture risks are equivalent between uncemented and cemented components, they occur at notably different time periods based on stem fixation type. ©2016 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Peri-prosthetic fractures; femur; epidemiology; revision total hip arthroplasty; Vancouver classification

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27037428     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B4.37203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  20 in total

1.  Periprosthetic femoral fracture as cause of early revision after short stem hip arthroplasty-a multicentric analysis.

Authors:  Sang-Min Kim; Seung-Beom Han; Kee Hyung Rhyu; Jeong Joon Yoo; Kwang-Jun Oh; Je Hyun Yoo; Kyung-Jae Lee; Seung-Jae Lim
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  Periprosthetic fractures: epidemiology and current treatment.

Authors:  Antonio Capone; Stefano Congia; Roberto Civinini; Giuseppe Marongiu
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2017-10-25

3.  DXA evaluation of femoral bone mineral density and cortical width in patients with prior total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  T Blaty; D Krueger; R Illgen; M Squire; B Heiderscheit; N Binkley; P Anderson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  [Strategies for stem revision : Surgery planning, implant removal and reimplantation].

Authors:  Sebastian Hardt; Lukas Schönnagel; Christian Hipfl
Journal:  Orthopadie (Heidelb)       Date:  2022-07-08

5.  Use of Natural Language Processing Tools to Identify and Classify Periprosthetic Femur Fractures.

Authors:  Meagan E Tibbo; Cody C Wyles; Sunyang Fu; Sunghwan Sohn; David G Lewallen; Daniel J Berry; Hilal Maradit Kremers
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Interprosthetic Femoral Fractures Surgical Treatment in Geriatric Patients.

Authors:  Marios Loucas; Rafael Loucas; Nico Safa Akhavan; Patrick Fries; Michael Dietrich
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2021-05-04

7.  Has the Use of Fixation Techniques in THA Changed in This Decade? The Uncemented Paradox Revisited.

Authors:  Kristine Ifigenia Bunyoz; Erik Malchau; Henrik Malchau; Anders Troelsen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 4.755

8.  Outcomes following revision surgery performed for adverse reactions to metal debris in non-metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty patients: Analysis of 185 revisions from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales.

Authors:  G S Matharu; A Judge; D W Murray; H G Pandit
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 5.853

9.  Outcomes After Metal-on-metal Hip Revision Surgery Depend on the Reason for Failure: A Propensity Score-matched Study.

Authors:  Gulraj S Matharu; Andrew Judge; David W Murray; Hemant G Pandit
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Which factors influence the rate of failure following metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty revision surgery performed for adverse reactions to metal debris? an analysis from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales.

Authors:  G S Matharu; A Judge; H G Pandit; D W Murray
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 5.082

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.