BACKGROUND: Manual chart review is labor-intensive and requires specialized knowledge possessed by highly trained medical professionals. The cost and infrastructure challenges required to implement this is prohibitive for most hospitals. Natural language processing (NLP) tools are distinctive in their ability to extract critical information from unstructured text in the electronic health records. As a simple proof-of-concept for the potential application of NLP technology in total hip arthroplasty (THA), we examined its ability to identify periprosthetic femur fractures (PPFFx) followed by more complex Vancouver classification. METHODS: PPFFx were identified among all THAs performed at a single academic institution between 1998 and 2016. A randomly selected training cohort (1538 THAs with 89 PPFFx cases) was used to develop the prototype NLP algorithm and an additional randomly selected cohort (2982 THAs with 84 PPFFx cases) was used to further validate the algorithm. Keywords to identify, and subsequently classify, Vancouver type PPFFx about THA were defined. The gold standard was confirmed by experienced orthopedic surgeons using chart and radiographic review. The algorithm was applied to consult and operative notes to evaluate language used by surgeons as a means to predict the correct pathology in the absence of a listed, precise diagnosis. Given the variability inherent to fracture descriptions by different surgeons, an iterative process was used to improve the algorithm during the training phase following error identification. Validation statistics were calculated using manual chart review as the gold standard. RESULTS: In distinguishing PPFFx, the NLP algorithm demonstrated 100% sensitivity and 99.8% specificity. Among 84 PPFFx test cases, the algorithm demonstrated 78.6% sensitivity and 94.8% specificity in determining the correct Vancouver classification. CONCLUSION: NLP-enabled algorithms are a promising alternative to manual chart review for identifying THA outcomes. NLP algorithms applied to surgeon notes demonstrated excellent accuracy in delineating PPFFx, but accuracy was low for Vancouver classification subtype. This proof-of-concept study supports the use of NLP technology to extract THA-specific data elements from the unstructured text in electronic health records in an expeditious and cost-effective manner. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
BACKGROUND: Manual chart review is labor-intensive and requires specialized knowledge possessed by highly trained medical professionals. The cost and infrastructure challenges required to implement this is prohibitive for most hospitals. Natural language processing (NLP) tools are distinctive in their ability to extract critical information from unstructured text in the electronic health records. As a simple proof-of-concept for the potential application of NLP technology in total hip arthroplasty (THA), we examined its ability to identify periprosthetic femur fractures (PPFFx) followed by more complex Vancouver classification. METHODS: PPFFx were identified among all THAs performed at a single academic institution between 1998 and 2016. A randomly selected training cohort (1538 THAs with 89 PPFFx cases) was used to develop the prototype NLP algorithm and an additional randomly selected cohort (2982 THAs with 84 PPFFx cases) was used to further validate the algorithm. Keywords to identify, and subsequently classify, Vancouver type PPFFx about THA were defined. The gold standard was confirmed by experienced orthopedic surgeons using chart and radiographic review. The algorithm was applied to consult and operative notes to evaluate language used by surgeons as a means to predict the correct pathology in the absence of a listed, precise diagnosis. Given the variability inherent to fracture descriptions by different surgeons, an iterative process was used to improve the algorithm during the training phase following error identification. Validation statistics were calculated using manual chart review as the gold standard. RESULTS: In distinguishing PPFFx, the NLP algorithm demonstrated 100% sensitivity and 99.8% specificity. Among 84 PPFFx test cases, the algorithm demonstrated 78.6% sensitivity and 94.8% specificity in determining the correct Vancouver classification. CONCLUSION: NLP-enabled algorithms are a promising alternative to manual chart review for identifying THA outcomes. NLP algorithms applied to surgeon notes demonstrated excellent accuracy in delineating PPFFx, but accuracy was low for Vancouver classification subtype. This proof-of-concept study supports the use of NLP technology to extract THA-specific data elements from the unstructured text in electronic health records in an expeditious and cost-effective manner. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
Authors: Javad Parvizi; Venkat R Rapuri; James J Purtill; Peter F Sharkey; Richard H Rothman; William J Hozack Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2004 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Joshua C Denny; Marylyn D Ritchie; Melissa A Basford; Jill M Pulley; Lisa Bastarache; Kristin Brown-Gentry; Deede Wang; Dan R Masys; Dan M Roden; Dana C Crawford Journal: Bioinformatics Date: 2010-03-24 Impact factor: 6.937
Authors: Hongfang Liu; Suzette J Bielinski; Sunghwan Sohn; Sean Murphy; Kavishwar B Wagholikar; Siddhartha R Jonnalagadda; K E Ravikumar; Stephen T Wu; Iftikhar J Kullo; Christopher G Chute Journal: AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc Date: 2013-03-18
Authors: Aditya V Karhade; Jacobien H F Oosterhoff; Olivier Q Groot; Nicole Agaronnik; Jeffrey Ehresman; Michiel E R Bongers; Ruurd L Jaarsma; Santosh I Poonnoose; Daniel M Sciubba; Daniel G Tobert; Job N Doornberg; Joseph H Schwab Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2022-04-12 Impact factor: 4.755
Authors: Elham Sagheb; Taghi Ramazanian; Ahmad P Tafti; Sunyang Fu; Walter K Kremers; Daniel J Berry; David G Lewallen; Sunghwan Sohn; Hilal Maradit Kremers Journal: J Arthroplasty Date: 2020-10-10 Impact factor: 4.757
Authors: Florian Jungmann; B Kämpgen; F Hahn; D Wagner; P Mildenberger; C Düber; R Kloeckner Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2021-04-13 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Sunyang Fu; Maria Vassilaki; Omar A Ibrahim; Ronald C Petersen; Sandeep Pagali; Jennifer St Sauver; Sungrim Moon; Liwei Wang; Jungwei W Fan; Hongfang Liu; Sunghwan Sohn Journal: Front Digit Health Date: 2022-09-27
Authors: Sunyang Fu; Cody C Wyles; Douglas R Osmon; Martha L Carvour; Elham Sagheb; Taghi Ramazanian; Walter K Kremers; David G Lewallen; Daniel J Berry; Sunghwan Sohn; Hilal Maradit Kremers Journal: J Arthroplasty Date: 2020-08-05 Impact factor: 4.757