Literature DB >> 27034970

Mouth Level Exposure and Similarity to Machine-smoked Constituent Yields.

Kia J Jackson1, Megan J Schroeder1, Allison C Hoffman2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this review was to evaluate which standard machine-smoking regimen may be most appropriate to inform tobacco product regulation based on the fraction of cigarette smoke yields that best represents the range of human smoke exposures.
METHODS: We searched PubMed and Web of Science to identify peer-reviewed studies that reported percentages of smokers who smoked more or less like a particular machine-smoking regimen based on human mouth level exposure (MLE) tobacco constituent yields.
RESULTS: Three studies met our inclusion criteria and were reviewed. Studies found that Canadian Intense (CI) yields were equal to or greater than 86% to 97% of smokers' nicotine and tar MLE yields.
CONCLUSIONS: MLE yields indicate that a small percentage of individuals (less than 14%) are exposed to nicotine and tar yields equal to or greater than those measured by the CI regimen. Whereas no machine-smoking regimen reflects human puffing behavior with complete accuracy, based on MLE data, CI constituent yields constitute the best representation of exposure that encompasses the majority of smokers, and may be the most informative for regulatory purposes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Canadian Intense; human smoke exposure; machine smoking regimen; mouth level exposure; tobacco constituent yields

Year:  2016        PMID: 27034970      PMCID: PMC4811367          DOI: 10.18001/trs.2.1.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tob Regul Sci        ISSN: 2333-9748


  15 in total

Review 1.  Cigarette filter ventilation is a defective design because of misleading taste, bigger puffs, and blocked vents.

Authors:  L T Kozlowski; R J O'Connor
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 7.552

2.  Estimating tar and nicotine exposure: human smoking versus machine generated smoke yields.

Authors:  F K St Charles; A A Kabbani; M F Borgerding
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2009-08-31       Impact factor: 3.271

3.  Cigarette yields and human exposure: a comparison of alternative testing regimens.

Authors:  David Hammond; Geoffrey T Fong; K Michael Cummings; Richard J O'Connor; Gary A Giovino; Ann McNeill
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Smoking topography and biomarkers of exposure among Japanese smokers: associations with cigarette emissions obtained using machine smoking protocols.

Authors:  Mariko Matsumoto; Yohei Inaba; Ichiro Yamaguchi; Osamu Endo; David Hammond; Shigehisa Uchiyama; Gen Suzuki
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 3.674

5.  Estimation of mouth level exposure to smoke constituents of cigarettes with different tar levels using filter analysis.

Authors:  T Hyodo; K Minagawa; T Inoue; J Fujimoto; N Minami; R Bito; A Mikita
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 3.271

6.  Relationship between cigarette format and mouth-level exposure to tar and nicotine in smokers of Russian king-size cigarettes.

Authors:  Madeleine Ashley; Mike Dixon; Krishna Prasad
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 3.271

7.  A comparison of nicotine dose estimates in smokers between filter analysis, salivary cotinine, and urinary excretion of nicotine metabolites.

Authors:  F K St Charles; G R Krautter; M Dixon; D C Mariner
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-10-07       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  A survey of mouth level exposure to cigarette smoke in the United States.

Authors:  Paul R Nelson; Peter Chen; Mike Dixon; Thomas Steichen
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2010-10-16       Impact factor: 3.271

9.  Estimation of nicotine and tar yields from human-smoked cigarettes before and after the implementation of the cigarette ignition propensity regulations in Canada.

Authors:  France Côté; Cécile Létourneau; Gavin Mullard; Richard Voisine
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 3.271

10.  Smoking topography and carbon monoxide levels in smokers.

Authors:  T A Burling; M L Stitzer; G E Bigelow; A M Mead
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 3.913

View more
  5 in total

1.  Effects of Charcoal on Carbonyl Delivery from Commercial, Research, and Make-Your-Own Cigarettes.

Authors:  Samantha M Reilly; Reema Goel; Neil Trushin; Zachary T Bitzer; Ryan J Elias; Joshua Muscat; John P Richie
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 3.739

2.  PhenX: Agent measures for tobacco regulatory research.

Authors:  Richard O'Connor; Clifford H Watson; Gary E Swan; Destiney S Nettles; Rebecca C Geisler; Tabitha P Hendershot
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 7.552

3.  Effects of Topography-Related Puff Parameters on Carbonyl Delivery in Mainstream Cigarette Smoke.

Authors:  Samantha M Reilly; Reema Goel; Zachary Bitzer; Ryan J Elias; Jonathan Foulds; Joshua Muscat; John P Richie
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 3.739

4.  Little Cigars, Filtered Cigars, and their Carbonyl Delivery Relative to Cigarettes.

Authors:  Samantha M Reilly; Reema Goel; Zachary Bitzer; Ryan J Elias; Jonathan Foulds; Joshua Muscat; John P Richie
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 4.244

5.  Electronic cigarette aerosol induces significantly less cytotoxicity than tobacco smoke.

Authors:  David Azzopardi; Kharishma Patel; Tomasz Jaunky; Simone Santopietro; Oscar M Camacho; John McAughey; Marianna Gaça
Journal:  Toxicol Mech Methods       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.987

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.