Literature DB >> 20303374

Estimation of nicotine and tar yields from human-smoked cigarettes before and after the implementation of the cigarette ignition propensity regulations in Canada.

France Côté1, Cécile Létourneau, Gavin Mullard, Richard Voisine.   

Abstract

In 2005, Human-Smoked (HS) tar and nicotine yields from commercial Canadian cigarettes were determined using a part filter analysis method to obtain estimates representative of human smoking behavior. In 2006, new cigarette designs were introduced to ensure compliance with the Canadian Low Ignition Propensity (LIP) regulations. It was not known how the changes in product design would affect HS yields. To assess the impact of the cigarette design modifications on HS yields, a further group of Canadian smokers was recruited for smoking the modified version of 10 products previously assessed. No differences in estimated HS tar yields were found between products following product modification. The HS nicotine yield was different for one product. In general, HS yields were higher than ISO machine yields while Canadian intense machine yields were more representative of the maximum HS yields. The same product ranking order was obtained for HS yields and the two machine yields but differences between the mean HS yields and ISO yields were smaller as the product ISO yields increased. Higher HS yields were measured when products were smoked by male smokers. The methodology used in this study showed the wide range of HS yields obtained by smokers as well as a good degree of stability in average HS yields just before and after the introduction of LIP regulations.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20303374     DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2010.03.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0273-2300            Impact factor:   3.271


  5 in total

1.  Does switching to reduced ignition propensity cigarettes alter smoking behavior or exposure to tobacco smoke constituents?

Authors:  Richard J O'Connor; Vaughan W Rees; Kaila J Norton; K Michael Cummings; Gregory N Connolly; Hillel R Alpert; Andreas Sjödin; Lovisa Romanoff; Zheng Li; Kristie M June; Gary A Giovino
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2010-08-30       Impact factor: 4.244

2.  Mouth Level Exposure and Similarity to Machine-smoked Constituent Yields.

Authors:  Kia J Jackson; Megan J Schroeder; Allison C Hoffman
Journal:  Tob Regul Sci       Date:  2016-01-01

3.  Cigarette ignition propensity, smoking behavior, and toxicant exposure: A natural experiment in Canada.

Authors:  Kristie M June; David Hammond; Andreas Sjödin; Zheng Li; Lovisa Romanoff; Richard J O'Connor
Journal:  Tob Induc Dis       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 2.600

4.  Mercapturic Acids Derived from the Toxicants Acrolein and Crotonaldehyde in the Urine of Cigarette Smokers from Five Ethnic Groups with Differing Risks for Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Sungshim L Park; Steven G Carmella; Menglan Chen; Yesha Patel; Daniel O Stram; Christopher A Haiman; Loic Le Marchand; Stephen S Hecht
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Electronic cigarette aerosol induces significantly less cytotoxicity than tobacco smoke.

Authors:  David Azzopardi; Kharishma Patel; Tomasz Jaunky; Simone Santopietro; Oscar M Camacho; John McAughey; Marianna Gaça
Journal:  Toxicol Mech Methods       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.987

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.