Literature DB >> 27030738

The sequential encoding of competing action goals involves dynamic restructuring of motor plans in working memory.

Jason P Gallivan1, Natasha A R Bowman2, Craig S Chapman3, Daniel M Wolpert4, J Randall Flanagan5.   

Abstract

Recent neural and behavioral findings provide support for the influential idea that in situations in which multiple action options are presented simultaneously, we prepare action plans for each competing option before deciding between and executing one of those plans. However, in natural, everyday environments, our available action options frequently change from one moment to the next, and there is often uncertainty as to whether additional options will become available before having to select a particular course of action. Here, with the use of a target-directed reaching task, we show that in this situation, the brain specifies a competing action for each new, sequentially presented potential target and that recently formed action plans can be revisited and updated so as to conform with separate, more newly developed, plans. These findings indicate that the brain forms labile motor plans for sequentially arising target options that can be flexibly restructured to accommodate new motor plans.
Copyright © 2016 the American Physiological Society.

Keywords:  action; decision-making; motor planning; perception; working memory

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27030738      PMCID: PMC4946594          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00951.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  50 in total

1.  The modulatory influence of end-point controllability on decisions between actions.

Authors:  Ignasi Cos; Farid Medleg; Paul Cisek
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Role of focal attention on latencies and trajectories of visually guided manual pointing.

Authors:  Joo-Hyun Song; Ken Nakayama
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory.

Authors:  Edward K Vogel; Andrew W McCollough; Maro G Machizawa
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  The cognitive neuroscience of working memory.

Authors:  Mark D'Esposito; Bradley R Postle
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 24.137

5.  Optic ataxia: a specific disruption in visuomotor mechanisms. I. Different aspects of the deficit in reaching for objects.

Authors:  M T Perenin; A Vighetto
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 13.501

6.  A network centered on ventral premotor cortex exerts both facilitatory and inhibitory control over primary motor cortex during action reprogramming.

Authors:  Ethan R Buch; Rogier B Mars; Erie D Boorman; Matthew F S Rushworth
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-01-27       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  A neural implementation of Wald's sequential probability ratio test.

Authors:  Shinichiro Kira; Tianming Yang; Michael N Shadlen
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Action plan co-optimization reveals the parallel encoding of competing reach movements.

Authors:  Jason P Gallivan; Kathryn S Barton; Craig S Chapman; Daniel M Wolpert; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  A biologically plausible computational theory for value integration and action selection in decisions with competing alternatives.

Authors:  Vassilios Christopoulos; James Bonaiuto; Richard A Andersen
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Three-dimensional reach trajectories as a probe of real-time decision-making between multiple competing targets.

Authors:  Jason P Gallivan; Craig S Chapman
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 4.677

View more
  12 in total

1.  Rapid Automatic Motor Encoding of Competing Reach Options.

Authors:  Jason P Gallivan; Brandie M Stewart; Lee A Baugh; Daniel M Wolpert; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 9.423

2.  Overlap of movement planning and movement execution reduces reaction time.

Authors:  Jean-Jacques Orban de Xivry; Valéry Legrain; Philippe Lefèvre
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  The temporal and spatial constraints of saccade planning to double-step target displacements.

Authors:  Shane Kelly; Weiwei Zhou; Sonia Bansal; Matthew S Peterson; Wilsaan M Joiner
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  From known to unknown: moving to unvisited locations in a novel sensorimotor map.

Authors:  Floris T van Vugt; David J Ostry
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2018-03-03       Impact factor: 5.691

5.  Expectation of volitional arm movement has prolonged effects on the grip force exerted on a pinched object.

Authors:  Anvesh Naik; Satyajit Ambike
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 2.064

Review 6.  Decision-making in sensorimotor control.

Authors:  Jason P Gallivan; Craig S Chapman; Daniel M Wolpert; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 34.870

7.  Grip force when reaching with target uncertainty provides evidence for motor optimization over averaging.

Authors:  Joseph Y Nashed; Jonathan S Diamond; Jason P Gallivan; Daniel M Wolpert; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Output planning at the input stage in visual working memory.

Authors:  Sage E P Boettcher; Daniela Gresch; Anna C Nobre; Freek van Ede
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 14.136

9.  Modulation of initial movement for double potential targets with specific time constraints.

Authors:  Ryoji Onagawa; Kazutoshi Kudo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Tracking stress via the computer mouse? Promises and challenges of a potential behavioral stress marker.

Authors:  Paul Freihaut; Anja S Göritz; Christoph Rockstroh; Johannes Blum
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-04-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.