Literature DB >> 35951095

Expectation of volitional arm movement has prolonged effects on the grip force exerted on a pinched object.

Anvesh Naik1, Satyajit Ambike2.   

Abstract

Humans closely coordinate the grip force exerted on a hand-held object with changes in the load arising from the object's dynamics. Recent work suggests the grip force is responsive to the predictability of the load forces as well. The well-known grip-force-load-force coupling is intermittent when the load arising from volitional movements fluctuates predictably, whereas grip force increases when loads are unpredictable. Here, we studied the influence of expected but uncertain volitional movements on the digit forces during a static grasp. Young, healthy participants used a pinch grasp to hold an instrumented object and track visual targets by moving the object. We quantified the mean grip force, the temporal decline in grip force (slacking), and the coupling between the pressing digit forces that yield the grip force during static prehension with no expectation of movement, and during the static phase of a choice reaction time task, when the participant expected to move the object after a variable duration. Simply expecting to move the object led to sustained (for at least 5 s) higher magnitude and lower slacking in the grip force, and weaker coupling between the pressing digit forces. These effects were modulated by the direction of the expected movement and the object's mass. The changes helped to maintain the safety margin for the current grasp and likely facilitated the transition from static to dynamic object manipulation. Influence of expected actions on the current grasp may have implications for manual dexterity and its well-known loss with age.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anticipatory control; Prehension; Slacking; Stability–dexterity tradeoff

Year:  2022        PMID: 35951095     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-022-06438-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   2.064


  72 in total

1.  Old age affects fingertip forces when restraining an unpredictably loaded object.

Authors:  K J Cole; D L Rotella
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The nature of constant and cyclic force production: unintentional force-drift characteristics.

Authors:  Satyajit Ambike; Daniela Mattos; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky; Mark L Latash
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Neural correlates of reaching decisions in dorsal premotor cortex: specification of multiple direction choices and final selection of action.

Authors:  Paul Cisek; John F Kalaska
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2005-03-03       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  The stability of precision grip force in older adults.

Authors:  K J Cole; C L Beck
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 1.328

5.  Coordination of fingertip forces during human manipulation can emerge from independent neural networks controlling each engaged digit.

Authors:  M K Burstedt; B B Edin; R S Johansson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Processes underlying unintentional finger-force changes in the absence of visual feedback.

Authors:  Satyajit Ambike; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky; Mark L Latash
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-11-23       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Human development of grip force modulation relating to cyclic movement-induced inertial loads.

Authors:  R Blank; A Breitenbach; M Nitschke; W Heizer; S Letzgus; J Hermsdörfer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Reward-Based Improvements in Motor Control Are Driven by Multiple Error-Reducing Mechanisms.

Authors:  Olivier Codol; Peter J Holland; Sanjay G Manohar; Joseph M Galea
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Moving a hand-held object: Reconstruction of referent coordinate and apparent stiffness trajectories.

Authors:  S Ambike; T Zhou; V M Zatsiorsky; M L Latash
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 3.590

10.  Unsteady steady-states: central causes of unintentional force drift.

Authors:  Satyajit Ambike; Daniela Mattos; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky; Mark L Latash
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.