Literature DB >> 27733598

Overlap of movement planning and movement execution reduces reaction time.

Jean-Jacques Orban de Xivry1,2,3, Valéry Legrain2,4, Philippe Lefèvre2,3.   

Abstract

Motor planning is the process of preparing the appropriate motor commands in order to achieve a goal. This process has largely been thought to occur before movement onset and traditionally has been associated with reaction time. However, in a virtual line bisection task we observed an overlap between movement planning and execution. In this task performed with a robotic manipulandum, we observed that participants (n = 30) made straight movements when the line was in front of them (near target) but often made curved movements when the same target was moved sideways (far target, which had the same orientation) in such a way that they crossed the line perpendicular to its orientation. Unexpectedly, movements to the far targets had shorter reaction times than movements to the near targets (mean difference: 32 ms, SE: 5 ms, max: 104 ms). In addition, the curvature of the movement modulated reaction time. A larger increase in movement curvature from the near to the far target was associated with a larger reduction in reaction time. These highly curved movements started with a transport phase during which accuracy demands were not taken into account. We conclude that an accuracy demand imposes a reaction time penalty if processed before movement onset. This penalty is reduced if the start of the movement consists of a transport phase and if the movement plan can be refined with respect to accuracy demands later in the movement, hence demonstrating an overlap between movement planning and execution. NEW & NOTEWORTHY: In the planning of a movement, the brain has the opportunity to delay the incorporation of accuracy requirements of the motor plan in order to reduce the reaction time by up to 100 ms (average: 32 ms). Such shortening of reaction time is observed here when the first phase of the movement consists of a transport phase. This forces us to reconsider the hypothesis that motor plans are fully defined before movement onset.
Copyright © 2017 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  execution; movement; planning; reaching; reaction time

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27733598      PMCID: PMC5209537          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00728.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  23 in total

1.  Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination.

Authors:  Emanuel Todorov; Michael I Jordan
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Target-size influences on reaction time with movement time controlled.

Authors:  J T Quinn; R A Schmidt; H N Zelaznik
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 1.328

3.  Influence of the behavioral goal and environmental obstacles on rapid feedback responses.

Authors:  Joseph Y Nashed; Frédéric Crevecoeur; Stephen H Scott
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  The temporal evolution of feedback gains rapidly update to task demands.

Authors:  Michael Dimitriou; Daniel M Wolpert; David W Franklin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Response programming in simple and choice reactions.

Authors:  S T Klapp; E Patrick Wyatt; W Mac Lingo
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1974-12       Impact factor: 1.328

6.  Task complexity, accuracy, and reaction time.

Authors:  J I Laszlo; J P Livesey
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 1.328

7.  Signal-dependent noise determines motor planning.

Authors:  C M Harris; D M Wolpert
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-08-20       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Motor, not visual, encoding of potential reach targets.

Authors:  Brandie M Stewart; Jason P Gallivan; Lee A Baugh; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2014-10-06       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  A switching cost for motor planning.

Authors:  Jean-Jacques Orban de Xivry; Philippe Lefèvre
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Neural dynamics of reaching following incorrect or absent motor preparation.

Authors:  K Cora Ames; Stephen I Ryu; Krishna V Shenoy
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 17.173

View more
  12 in total

1.  Neural correlates of proprioceptive upper limb position matching.

Authors:  Francesca Marini; Jacopo Zenzeri; Valentina Pippo; Pietro Morasso; Claudio Campus
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Intercepting virtual balls approaching under different gravity conditions: evidence for spatial prediction.

Authors:  Marta Russo; Benedetta Cesqui; Barbara La Scaleia; Francesca Ceccarelli; Antonella Maselli; Alessandro Moscatelli; Myrka Zago; Francesco Lacquaniti; Andrea d'Avella
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Reaction times can reflect habits rather than computations.

Authors:  Aaron L Wong; Jeff Goldsmith; Alexander D Forrence; Adrian M Haith; John W Krakauer
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  The Effects of Reducing Preparation Time on the Execution of Intentionally Curved Trajectories: Optimization and Geometrical Analysis.

Authors:  Dovrat Kohen; Matan Karklinsky; Yaron Meirovitch; Tamar Flash; Lior Shmuelof
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Simultaneous motor preparation and execution in a last-moment reach correction task.

Authors:  K Cora Ames; Stephen I Ryu; Krishna V Shenoy
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  The Role of Motor Activity in Insight Problem Solving (the Case of the Nine-Dot Problem).

Authors:  Vladimir Spiridonov; Nikita Loginov; Ivan Ivanchei; Andrei V Kurgansky
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-01-23

7.  Robot-assisted line bisection in patients with Complex Regional Pain Syndrome.

Authors:  Charlotte Verfaille; Lieve Filbrich; David Cordova Bulens; Philippe Lefèvre; Anne Berquin; Olivier Barbier; Xavier Libouton; Virginie Fraselle; Dominique Mouraux; Valéry Legrain
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Older adults use a motor plan that is detrimental to endpoint control.

Authors:  Stefan Delmas; Yoon Jin Choi; Marcel Komer; Michelle Weintraub; Basma Yacoubi; Evangelos A Christou
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 4.996

9.  Sensorimotor strategy selection under time constraints in the presence of two motor targets with different values.

Authors:  Ryoji Onagawa; Kazutoshi Kudo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  The relationship between reinforcement and explicit control during visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Olivier Codol; Peter J Holland; Joseph M Galea
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.