Literature DB >> 27030411

Predator encounters have spatially extensive impacts on parental behaviour in a breeding bird community.

Kadri Moks1, Vallo Tilgar2, Robert L Thomson3, Sara Calhim4, Pauliina E Järvistö5, Wiebke Schuett6, William Velmala5, Toni Laaksonen5.   

Abstract

Predation risk has negative indirect effects on prey fitness, partly mediated through changes in behaviour. Evidence that individuals gather social information from other members of the population suggests that events in a community may impact the behaviour of distant individuals. However, spatially wide-ranging impacts on individual behaviour caused by a predator encounter elsewhere in a community have not been documented before. We investigated the effect of a predator encounter (hawk model presented at a focal nest) on the parental behaviour of pied flycatchers (Ficedula hypoleuca), both at the focal nest and at nearby nests different distances from the predator encounter. We show that nest visitation of both focal pairs and nearby pairs were affected, up to 3 h and 1 h, respectively. Parents also appeared to compensate initial disrupted feeding by later increasing nest visitation rates. This is the first evidence showing that the behaviour of nearby pairs was affected away from an immediate source of risk. Our results indicate that the impacts of short-term predator encounters may immediately extend spatially to the broader community, affecting the behaviour of distant individuals. Information about predators is probably quickly spread by cues such as intra- and heterospecific alarm calls, in communities of different taxa.
© 2016 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ficedula hypoleuca; community; predation risk; spatial impact

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27030411      PMCID: PMC4822463          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2016.0020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  19 in total

1.  The functional organization of anti-predator behaviour in the pied flycatcher: a study of avian visual perception.

Authors:  E Curio
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1975-02       Impact factor: 2.844

2.  Parent birds assess nest predation risk and adjust their reproductive strategies.

Authors:  J J Fontaine; T E Martin
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 9.492

3.  Predation risk induces changes in nest-site selection and clutch size in the Siberian jay.

Authors:  Sönke Eggers; Michael Griesser; Magdalena Nystrand; Jan Ekman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 4.  Predators and the breeding bird: behavioral and reproductive flexibility under the risk of predation.

Authors:  Steven L Lima
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2009-08

Review 5.  Eavesdropping on heterospecific alarm calls: from mechanisms to consequences.

Authors:  Robert D Magrath; Tonya M Haff; Pamela M Fallow; Andrew N Radford
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2014-06-11

6.  Predation as a landscape effect: the trading off by prey species between predation risks and protection benefits.

Authors:  M Mönkkönen; M Husby; R Tornberg; P Helle; R L Thomson
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 5.091

7.  Nesting songbirds assess spatial heterogeneity of predatory chipmunks by eavesdropping on their vocalizations.

Authors:  Quinn C Emmering; Kenneth A Schmidt
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 5.091

8.  Glucocorticoid stress hormones and the effect of predation risk on elk reproduction.

Authors:  Scott Creel; John A Winnie; David Christianson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Interspecific reciprocity explains mobbing behaviour of the breeding chaffinches, Fringilla coelebs.

Authors:  Indrikis Krams; Tatjana Krama
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  You mob my owl, I'll mob yours: birds play tit-for-tat game.

Authors:  Tatjana Krama; Jolanta Vrublevska; Todd M Freeberg; Cecilia Kullberg; Markus J Rantala; Indrikis Krams
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  2 in total

1.  Assessing behavioral sex differences to chemical cues of predation risk while provisioning nestlings in a hole-nesting bird.

Authors:  Irene Saavedra; Gustavo Tomás; Luisa Amo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  Impact of continuous predator threat on telomere dynamics in parent and nestling pied flycatchers.

Authors:  Tiia Kärkkäinen; Pauliina Teerikorpi; Bineet Panda; Samuli Helle; Antoine Stier; Toni Laaksonen
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 3.225

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.