Literature DB >> 19659887

Predators and the breeding bird: behavioral and reproductive flexibility under the risk of predation.

Steven L Lima1.   

Abstract

A growing body of work suggests that breeding birds have a significant capacity to assess and respond, over ecological time, to changes in the risk of predation to both themselves and their eggs or nestlings. This review investigates the nature of this flexibility in the face of predation from both behavioural and reproductive perspectives, and also explores several directions for future research. Most available work addresses different aspects of nest predation. A substantial change in breeding location is perhaps the best documented response to nest predation, but such changes are not always observed and not necessarily the best strategy. Changes in nesting microhabitat (to more concealed locations) following predation are known to occur. Surprisingly little work addresses the proactive avoidance of areas with many nest predators, but such avoidance is probably widespread. Individual birds could conceivably adopt anti-predator strategies based on the nest predators actually present in an area, but such effects have yet to be demonstrated. In fact, the ways in which birds assess the risk of nest predation is unclear. Nest defence in birds has historically received much attention, but little is known about how it interacts with other aspects of decision-making by parents. Other studies concentrate on predation risk to adults. Some findings suggest that risk to adults themselves influences territory location, especially relative to raptor nests. An almost completely unexplored area concerns the sorts of social protection from predators that might exist during the breeding season. Flocking typical of the non-breeding season appears unusual while breeding, but a mated pair may sometimes act as a "flock of two". Opportunistic heterospecific sociality may exist, with heterospecific protector species associations more prevalent than currently appreciated. The dynamics of singing during the breeding season may also respond to variation in predation risk, but empirical research on this subject is limited. Furthermore, a few theoretical and empirical studies suggest that changes in predation risk also influence the behaviour of lekking males. The major influence of predators on avian life histories is undoubtedly expressed at a broad phylogenetic scale, but several studies hint at much flexibility on an ecological time scale. Some species may forgo breeding completely if the risk of nest predation is too high, and a few studies document smaller clutch sizes in response to an increase in nest predation. Recent evidence suggests that a female may produce smaller eggs rather than smaller clutches following an increase in nest predation risk. Such an increase may also influence decisions about intraspecific brood parasitism. There are no clear examples of changes in clutch/egg size with changes in risk experienced by adults, but parental responses to predators have clear consequences for offspring fitness. Changes in risk to adults may also influence body mass changes across the breeding season, although research here is sparse. The topics highlighted herein are all in need more empirical attention, and more experimental field work whenever feasible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19659887     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2009.00085.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc        ISSN: 0006-3231


  81 in total

1.  Facultative nest patch shifts in response to nest predation risk in the Brewer's sparrow: a "win-stay, lose-switch" strategy?

Authors:  Anna D Chalfoun; Thomas E Martin
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Multiple measures elucidate glucocorticoid responses to environmental variation in predation threat.

Authors:  Michael Clinchy; Liana Zanette; Thierry D Charlier; Amy E M Newman; Kim L Schmidt; Rudy Boonstra; Kiran K Soma
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-01-30       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  The risk of predation favors cooperation among breeding prey.

Authors:  Indrikis Krams; Tatjana Krama; Arnis Berzins; Markus J Rantala
Journal:  Commun Integr Biol       Date:  2010-05

4.  Conflict between biotic and climatic selective pressures acting on an extended phenotype in a subarctic, but not temperate, environment.

Authors:  V G Rohwer; F Bonier; P R Martin
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Calling at a cost: elevated nestling calling attracts predators to active nests.

Authors:  Tonya M Haff; Robert D Magrath
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  Plasticity of parental care under the risk of predation: how much should parents reduce care?

Authors:  Cameron K Ghalambor; Susana I Peluc; Thomas E Martin
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  Too risky to settle: avian community structure changes in response to perceived predation risk on adults and offspring.

Authors:  Fangyuan Hua; Robert J Fletcher; Kathryn E Sieving; Robert M Dorazio
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  The increased risk of predation enhances cooperation.

Authors:  Indrikis Krams; Arnis Bērziņs; Tatjana Krama; David Wheatcroft; Kristīne Igaune; Markus J Rantala
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Experimental evidence that sentinel behaviour is affected by risk.

Authors:  A R Ridley; N J Raihani; M B V Bell
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 3.703

10.  Behavioral plasticity in response to perceived predation risk in breeding house wrens.

Authors:  Erin E Dorset; Scott K Sakaluk; Charles F Thompson
Journal:  Evol Biol       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 3.119

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.