Literature DB >> 24917385

Eavesdropping on heterospecific alarm calls: from mechanisms to consequences.

Robert D Magrath1, Tonya M Haff, Pamela M Fallow, Andrew N Radford.   

Abstract

Animals often gather information from other species by eavesdropping on signals intended for others. We review the extent, benefits, mechanisms, and ecological and evolutionary consequences of eavesdropping on other species' alarm calls. Eavesdropping has been shown experimentally in about 70 vertebrate species, and can entail closely or distantly related species. The benefits of eavesdropping include prompting immediate anti-predator responses, indirect enhancement of foraging or changed habitat use, and learning about predators. Eavesdropping on heterospecifics can provide more eyes looking for danger, complementary information to that from conspecifics, and potentially information at reduced cost. The response to heterospecific calls can be unlearned or learned. Unlearned responses occur when heterospecific calls have acoustic features similar to that used to recognize conspecific calls, or acoustic properties such as harsh sounds that prompt attention and may allow recognition or facilitate learning. Learning to recognize heterospecific alarm calls is probably essential to allow recognition of the diversity of alarm calls, but the evidence is largely indirect. The value of eavesdropping on different species is affected by problems of signal interception and the relevance of heterospecific alarm calls to the listener. These constraints on eavesdropping will affect how information flows among species and thus affect community function. Some species are 'keystone' information producers, while others largely seek information, and these differences probably affect the formation and function of mixed-species groups. Eavesdroppers might also integrate alarm calls from multiple species to extract relevant and reliable information. Eavesdropping appears to set the stage for the evolution of interspecific deception and communication, and potentially affects communication within species. Overall, we now know that eavesdropping on heterospecific alarm calls is an important source of information for many species across the globe, and there are ample opportunities for research on mechanisms, fitness consequences and implications for community function and signalling evolution.
© 2014 The Authors. Biological Reviews © 2014 Cambridge Philosophical Society.

Keywords:  alarm call; anti-predator behaviour; deception; eavesdropping; heterospecific eavesdropping; information network; interspecific eavesdropping; mimicry; mixed-species groups; predation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24917385     DOI: 10.1111/brv.12122

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc        ISSN: 0006-3231


  46 in total

1.  Hearing is believing: Birds learn fear.

Authors:  Christopher B Sturdy; Darren S Proppe
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Crying wolf to a predator: deceptive vocal mimicry by a bird protecting young.

Authors:  Branislav Igic; Jessica McLachlan; Inkeri Lehtinen; Robert D Magrath
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Social learning of acoustic anti-predator cues occurs between wild bird species.

Authors:  Sara C Keen; Ella F Cole; Michael J Sheehan; Ben C Sheldon
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Acoustic structure of alarm calls in Indian sambar (Rusa unicolor) and Indian muntjac (Muntiacus vaginalis) in South Vietnam.

Authors:  I A Volodin; E V Volodina; R Frey; S S Gogoleva; I V Palko; V V Rozhnov
Journal:  Dokl Biol Sci       Date:  2017-07-13

5.  A stochastic differential game approach toward animal migration.

Authors:  Hidekazu Yoshioka
Journal:  Theory Biosci       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 1.919

6.  Personal information about danger trumps social information from avian alarm calls.

Authors:  Jessica R McLachlan; Chaminda P Ratnayake; Robert D Magrath
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Learning about construction behaviour from observing an artefact: can experience with conspecifics aid in artefact recognition?

Authors:  Andrés Camacho-Alpízar; Tristan Eckersley; Connor T Lambert; Gopika Balasubramanian; Lauren M Guillette
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 3.084

8.  Predator encounters have spatially extensive impacts on parental behaviour in a breeding bird community.

Authors:  Kadri Moks; Vallo Tilgar; Robert L Thomson; Sara Calhim; Pauliina E Järvistö; Wiebke Schuett; William Velmala; Toni Laaksonen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Discriminating between similar alarm calls of contrasting function.

Authors:  Natalie T Tegtman; Robert D Magrath
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Tape lures swell bycatch on a Mediterranean island harbouring illegal bird trapping.

Authors:  Matteo Sebastianelli; Georgios Savva; Michaella Moysi; Alexander N G Kirschel
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 3.703

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.