Literature DB >> 21699539

Nesting songbirds assess spatial heterogeneity of predatory chipmunks by eavesdropping on their vocalizations.

Quinn C Emmering1, Kenneth A Schmidt.   

Abstract

1. Information benefits organisms living in a heterogeneous world by reducing uncertainty associated with decision making. For breeding passerines, information reliably associated with nest failure, such as predator activity, can be used to adjust breeding decisions leading to higher reproductive success. 2. Predator vocalizations may provide a source of current information for songbirds to assess spatial heterogeneity in risk that enables them to make appropriate nest-site and territory placement decisions. 3. To determine whether ground-nesting passerines eavesdrop on a common nest predator, the eastern chipmunk (Tamias striatus), we conducted a playback experiment to create spatial heterogeneity in perceived predation risk. We established three types of playback plots broadcasting: (i) chipmunk vocalizations (increased risk), (ii) frog calls (procedural control) and (iii) no playback (silent control). We conducted point counts from plot centres to compare bird activity among treatments and measured the distance of two ground-nesting species' nests, ovenbird (Seiurus aurocapilla) and veery (Catharus fuscescens), from playback stations. 4. Ground-nesting birds significantly reduced their activities up to 30 m from plot centres in response to playbacks of chipmunk calls suggesting an adjustment of territory placement or a reduction of overt behaviours (e.g. singing frequency). In contrast, less vulnerable canopy-nesting species showed no effect across experimental plots. Correspondingly, veeries and ovenbirds nested significantly further from chipmunk playback stations relative to control stations. Interestingly, the magnitude of this response was more than twice as high in ovenbirds than in veeries. 5. Our findings indicate that some breeding passerines may eavesdrop on predator communication, providing an explanation for how some birds assess spatial heterogeneity in predation risk to make breeding site decisions. Thus, heterospecific eavesdropping may be a common feature of predator-prey interactions that allows birds to avoid nest predators in space and provide greater stability to predator-prey dynamics.
© 2011 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2011 British Ecological Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21699539     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2011.01869.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  10 in total

1.  Avian and rodent responses to the olfactory landscape in a Mediterranean cavity community.

Authors:  Jesús M Avilés; Deseada Parejo; Mónica Expósito-Granados
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2019-08-17       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Predator encounters have spatially extensive impacts on parental behaviour in a breeding bird community.

Authors:  Kadri Moks; Vallo Tilgar; Robert L Thomson; Sara Calhim; Pauliina E Järvistö; Wiebke Schuett; William Velmala; Toni Laaksonen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Receivers matter: the meaning of alarm calls and competition for nest sites in a bird community.

Authors:  Deseada Parejo; Jesús M Avilés; Mónica Expósito-Granados
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Reproductive Performance of a Declining Forest Passerine in Relation to Environmental and Social Factors: Implications for Species Conservation.

Authors:  Alex Grendelmeier; Raphaël Arlettaz; Michael Gerber; Gilberto Pasinelli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Linking songbird nest predation to seedling density: Sugar maple masting as a resource pulse in a forest food web.

Authors:  Marie-Line Fiola; Alizée Vernouillet; Marc-André Villard
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  An experimental test of host's life history traits modulation in response to cuckoo parasitism risk.

Authors:  Mónica Expósito-Granados; Deseada Parejo; Juan Gabriel Martínez; Alfredo Sánchez-Tójar; Marta Precioso; Mercedes Molina-Morales; Jesús M Avilés
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Melanism influences the use of social information in a polymorphic owl.

Authors:  Deseada Parejo; Jesús M Avilés
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Assessing landscape constraints on species abundance: does the neighborhood limit species response to local habitat conservation programs?

Authors:  Christopher F Jorgensen; Larkin A Powell; Jeffery J Lusk; Andrew A Bishop; Joseph J Fontaine
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Partitioning the sources of demographic variation reveals density-dependent nest predation in an island bird population.

Authors:  Helen R Sofaer; T Scott Sillett; Kathryn M Langin; Scott A Morrison; Cameron K Ghalambor
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Indirect risk effects reduce feeding efficiency of ducks during spring.

Authors:  Adam C Behney; Ryan O'Shaughnessy; Michael W Eichholz; Joshua D Stafford
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 2.912

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.