Literature DB >> 21227984

Optimizing a Candida biofilm microtiter plate model for measurement of antifungal susceptibility by tetrazolium salt assay.

Jeniel E Nett1, Michael T Cain, Kyler Crawford, David R Andes.   

Abstract

Candida spp. infect medical devices, such as venous and urinary catheters, by adhering to the surface and forming a community of drug-resistant cells surrounded by a matrix. The ability to measure drug activity during this biofilm mode of growth is of interest for the investigation of resistance mechanisms and novel antifungal therapies. The tetrazolium salt (XTT) reduction assay is the test most commonly used to estimate viable biofilm growth and to examine the impact of biofilm therapies. The primary goal of the current experiments was to identify assay variables that affect the XTT assay result in order to improve assay reproducibility, sensitivity, and throughput for the study of antifungal activity. The species used in the current studies included Candida albicans, C. parapsilosis, and C. glabrata. The assay variables that were studied included the impact of culture conditions, the duration of biofilm growth, the timing and frequency of drug administration, the XTT source and concentration, and the duration of XTT incubation. The conditions that impacted the assay readout and altered assay sensitivity included the duration of biofilm growth, the frequency of drug dosing, and the duration of XTT incubation. Several factors were found to reduce time and assay expense, including the elimination of washing steps, the shortening of incubation times, and the use of lower XTT concentrations. A description of assay pitfalls and troubleshooting is included. Recognition of these technical variables should allow investigators to better design reproducible biofilm therapeutic studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21227984      PMCID: PMC3122839          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.02273-10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  39 in total

Review 1.  Candida biofilms: antifungal resistance and emerging therapeutic options.

Authors:  Duncan M Kuhn; Mahmoud A Ghannoum
Journal:  Curr Opin Investig Drugs       Date:  2004-02

2.  Comparison of three assays for the quantification of Candida biomass in suspension and CDC reactor grown biofilms.

Authors:  Kris Honraet; Els Goetghebeur; Hans J Nelis
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2005-06-02       Impact factor: 2.363

3.  Quorum sensing in the dimorphic fungus Candida albicans is mediated by farnesol.

Authors:  J M Hornby; E C Jensen; A D Lisec; J J Tasto; B Jahnke; R Shoemaker; P Dussault; K W Nickerson
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Biofilm formation by the fungal pathogen Candida albicans: development, architecture, and drug resistance.

Authors:  J Chandra; D M Kuhn; P K Mukherjee; L L Hoyer; T McCormick; M A Ghannoum
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  Phase-dependent antifungal activity against Aspergillus fumigatus developing multicellular filamentous biofilms.

Authors:  Eilidh Mowat; Sue Lang; Craig Williams; Elaine McCulloch; Brian Jones; Gordon Ramage
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2008-09-26       Impact factor: 5.790

6.  Reduced biocide susceptibility in Candida albicans biofilms.

Authors:  Jeniel E Nett; Kristie M Guite; Alex Ringeisen; Kathleen A Holoyda; David R Andes
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-06-23       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Mechanism of fluconazole resistance in Candida albicans biofilms: phase-specific role of efflux pumps and membrane sterols.

Authors:  Pranab K Mukherjee; Jyotsna Chandra; Duncan M Kuhn; Mahmoud A Ghannoum
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.441

8.  Paradoxical growth effect of caspofungin observed on biofilms and planktonic cells of five different Candida species.

Authors:  Analy S Melo; Arnaldo L Colombo; Beth A Arthington-Skaggs
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2007-06-25       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Biofilm formation of Candida albicans is variably affected by saliva and dietary sugars.

Authors:  Ye Jin; Lakshman P Samaranayake; Yuthika Samaranayake; Hak Kong Yip
Journal:  Arch Oral Biol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.633

10.  Synergistic effect of calcineurin inhibitors and fluconazole against Candida albicans biofilms.

Authors:  Priya Uppuluri; Jeniel Nett; Joseph Heitman; David Andes
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-01-07       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  56 in total

1.  Effects of fluconazole, amphotericin B, and caspofungin on Candida albicans biofilms under conditions of flow and on biofilm dispersion.

Authors:  Priya Uppuluri; Anand Srinivasan; Anand Ramasubramanian; Jose L Lopez-Ribot
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-04-25       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Waikialoid A suppresses hyphal morphogenesis and inhibits biofilm development in pathogenic Candida albicans.

Authors:  Xiaoru Wang; Jianlan You; Jarrod B King; Douglas R Powell; Robert H Cichewicz
Journal:  J Nat Prod       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 4.050

3.  High-throughput screening of multispecies biofilm formation and quantitative PCR-based assessment of individual species proportions, useful for exploring interspecific bacterial interactions.

Authors:  Dawei Ren; Jonas Stenløkke Madsen; Claudia I de la Cruz-Perera; Lasse Bergmark; Søren J Sørensen; Mette Burmølle
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 4.552

4.  Quantitative and Qualitative Assessment Methods for Biofilm Growth: A Mini-review.

Authors:  Christina Wilson; Rachel Lukowicz; Stefan Merchant; Helena Valquier-Flynn; Jeniffer Caballero; Jasmin Sandoval; Macduff Okuom; Christopher Huber; Tessa Durham Brooks; Erin Wilson; Barbara Clement; Christopher D Wentworth; Andrea E Holmes
Journal:  Res Rev J Eng Technol       Date:  2017-10-24

5.  Targeting Fibronectin To Disrupt In Vivo Candida albicans Biofilms.

Authors:  Jeniel E Nett; Jonathan Cabezas-Olcoz; Karen Marchillo; Deane F Mosher; David R Andes
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  The role of Mss11 in Candida albicans biofilm formation.

Authors:  Pei-Wen Tsai; Yu-Ting Chen; Cheng-Yao Yang; Hsueh-Fen Chen; Te-Sheng Tan; Tzung-Wei Lin; Wen-Ping Hsieh; Chung-Yu Lan
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 3.291

7.  Nylon-3 polymers active against drug-resistant Candida albicans biofilms.

Authors:  Runhui Liu; Xinyu Chen; Shaun P Falk; Kristyn S Masters; Bernard Weisblum; Samuel H Gellman
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 15.419

8.  Small-molecule suppressors of Candida albicans biofilm formation synergistically enhance the antifungal activity of amphotericin B against clinical Candida isolates.

Authors:  Jianlan You; Lin Du; Jarrod B King; Brian E Hall; Robert H Cichewicz
Journal:  ACS Chem Biol       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 5.100

9.  Peptidylarginine deiminase 2 is required for tumor necrosis factor alpha-induced citrullination and arthritis, but not neutrophil extracellular trap formation.

Authors:  Mandar Bawadekar; Daeun Shim; Chad J Johnson; Thomas F Warner; Ryan Rebernick; Dres Damgaard; Claus H Nielsen; Ger J M Pruijn; Jeniel E Nett; Miriam A Shelef
Journal:  J Autoimmun       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 7.094

10.  Exploiting Interkingdom Interactions for Development of Small-Molecule Inhibitors of Candida albicans Biofilm Formation.

Authors:  F Jerry Reen; John P Phelan; Lorna Gallagher; David F Woods; Rachel M Shanahan; Rafael Cano; Eoin Ó Muimhneacháin; Gerard P McGlacken; Fergal O'Gara
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.