Literature DB >> 27021150

Microstructural and compositional contributions towards the mechanical behavior of aging human bone measured by cyclic and impact reference point indentation.

Adam C Abraham1, Avinesh Agarwalla2, Aditya Yadavalli2, Jenny Y Liu1, Simon Y Tang3.   

Abstract

The assessment of fracture risk often relies primarily on measuring bone mineral density, thereby accounting for only a single pathology: the loss of bone mass. However, bone's ability to resist fracture is a result of its biphasic composition and hierarchical structure that imbue it with high strength and toughness. Reference point indentation (RPI) testing is designed to directly probe bone mechanical behavior at the microscale in situ, although it remains unclear which aspects of bone composition and structure influence the results at this scale. Therefore, our goal in this study was to investigate factors that contribute to bone mechanical behavior measured by cyclic reference point indentation, impact reference point indentation, and three-point bending. Twenty-eight female cadavers (ages 57-97) were subjected to cyclic and impact RPI in parallel at the unmodified tibia mid-diaphysis. After RPI, the middiaphyseal tibiae were removed, scanned using micro-CT to obtain cortical porosity (Ct.Po.) and tissue mineral density (TMD), then tested using three-point bending, and lastly assayed for the accumulation of advanced glycation end-products (AGEs). Both the indentation distance increase from cyclic RPI (IDI) and bone material strength index from impact RPI (BMSi) were significantly correlated with TMD (r=-0.390, p=0.006; r=0.430, p=0.002; respectively). Accumulation of AGEs was significantly correlated with IDI (r=0.281, p=0.046), creep indentation distance (CID, r=0.396, p=0.004), and BMSi (r=-0.613, p<0.001). There were no significant relationships between tissue TMD or AGEs accumulation with the quasi-static material properties. Toughness decreased with increasing tissue Ct.Po. (r=-0.621, p<0.001). Other three-point bending measures also correlated with tissue Ct.Po. including the bending modulus (r=-0.50, p<0.001) and ultimate stress (r=-0.56, p<0.001). The effects of Ct.Po. on indentation were less pronounced with IDI (r=0.290, p=0.043) and BMSi (r=-0.299, p=0.037) correlated modestly with tissue Ct.Po. These results suggest that RPI may be sensitive to bone quality changes relating to collagen.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Advanced glycation end-products; Aging; Bone mechanics; Bone viscoelasticity; Damage mechanics; Reference point indentation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27021150      PMCID: PMC4862905          DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2016.03.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  37 in total

1.  Influence of nonenzymatic glycation on biomechanical properties of cortical bone.

Authors:  D Vashishth; G J Gibson; J I Khoury; M B Schaffler; J Kimura; D P Fyhrie
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 2.  The elastic moduli of human subchondral, trabecular, and cortical bone tissue and the size-dependency of cortical bone modulus.

Authors:  K Choi; J L Kuhn; M J Ciarelli; S A Goldstein
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Effects of non-enzymatic glycation on cancellous bone fragility.

Authors:  S Y Tang; U Zeenath; D Vashishth
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  Cooperative deformation of mineral and collagen in bone at the nanoscale.

Authors:  Himadri S Gupta; Jong Seto; Wolfgang Wagermaier; Paul Zaslansky; Peter Boesecke; Peter Fratzl
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-11-09       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  In vivo assessment of bone quality in postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Joshua N Farr; Matthew T Drake; Shreyasee Amin; L Joseph Melton; Louise K McCready; Sundeep Khosla
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Age-related changes in the tensile properties of cortical bone. The relative importance of changes in porosity, mineralization, and microstructure.

Authors:  R W McCalden; J A McGeough; M B Barker; C M Court-Brown
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 7.  Basic biomechanical measurements of bone: a tutorial.

Authors:  C H Turner; D B Burr
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1993 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.398

8.  Comparison of cyclic and impact-based reference point indentation measurements in human cadaveric tibia.

Authors:  Lamya Karim; Miranda Van Vliet; Mary L Bouxsein
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 9.  Insights into the epidemiology of postmenopausal osteoporosis: the Women's Health Initiative.

Authors:  Rebecca D Jackson; W Jerry Mysiw
Journal:  Semin Reprod Med       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 1.303

10.  Age-related changes in the collagen network and toughness of bone.

Authors:  X Wang; X Shen; X Li; C Mauli Agrawal
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.398

View more
  11 in total

1.  Local bone quality measurements correlates with maximum screw torque at the femoral diaphysis.

Authors:  Christopher M McAndrew; Avinesh Agarwalla; Adam C Abraham; Eric Feuchtbaum; William M Ricci; Simon Y Tang
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2018-02-03       Impact factor: 2.063

Review 2.  Clinical Evaluation of Bone Strength and Fracture Risk.

Authors:  Chantal M J de Bakker; Wei-Ju Tseng; Yihan Li; Hongbo Zhao; X Sherry Liu
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 5.096

3.  PTH and bone material strength in hypoparathyroidism as measured by impact microindentation.

Authors:  J R Starr; G Tabacco; R Majeed; B Omeragic; L Bandeira; M R Rubin
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Loss of scleraxis in mice leads to geometric and structural changes in cortical bone, as well as asymmetry in fracture healing.

Authors:  Jennifer A McKenzie; Evan Buettmann; Adam C Abraham; Michael J Gardner; Matthew J Silva; Megan L Killian
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 5.  Tissue-Level Mechanical Properties of Bone Contributing to Fracture Risk.

Authors:  Jeffry S Nyman; Mathilde Granke; Robert C Singleton; George M Pharr
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 5.096

6.  In Vitro-Induced High Sugar Environments Deteriorate Human Cortical Bone Elastic Modulus and Fracture Toughness.

Authors:  Kelly Merlo; Jacob Aaronson; Rachana Vaidya; Taraneh Rezaee; Vijaya Chalivendra; Lamya Karim
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2019-12-08       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  Differences in sensitivity to microstructure between cyclic- and impact-based microindentation of human cortical bone.

Authors:  Sasidhar Uppuganti; Mathilde Granke; Mary Kate Manhard; Mark D Does; Daniel S Perrien; Donald H Lee; Jeffry S Nyman
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 3.494

8.  The effect of aminoguanidine (AG) and pyridoxamine (PM) on ageing human cortical bone.

Authors:  O Abar; S Dharmar; S Y Tang
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 5.853

9.  Is the 0.2%-Strain-Offset Approach Appropriate for Calculating the Yield Stress of Cortical Bone?

Authors:  Guanjun Zhang; Junjie Luo; Gang Zheng; Zhonghao Bai; Libo Cao; Haojie Mao
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 3.934

10.  Added Value of Impact Microindentation in the Evaluation of Bone Fragility: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Manuela Schoeb; Neveen A T Hamdy; Frank Malgo; Elizabeth M Winter; Natasha M Appelman-Dijkstra
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 5.555

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.