| Literature DB >> 27020586 |
Nynke S van den Berg1,2, Mitsuharu Miwa3, Gijs H KleinJan1,4, Takayuki Sato3, Yoshiki Maeda5, Alexander C J van Akkooi6, Simon Horenblas2, Baris Karakullukcu7, Fijs W B van Leeuwen8,9,10.
Abstract
BACKGROUND ANDEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27020586 PMCID: PMC4927603 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-016-5186-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Surg Oncol ISSN: 1068-9265 Impact factor: 5.344
Characteristics of the conventional and modified PDE fluorescence cameras
| c-PDE | m-PDE | |
|---|---|---|
| Excitation light source | LED (continuous) | LED (pulsed) |
| Imaging device | CCD | CCD |
| Excitation/emission wavelength | 760/>820 nm | 760/>820 nm |
| Handheld | Yes | Yes |
| Pulsed fluorescence imaging | No | Yes |
| White-light imaging | No | Yes |
| Focus adjustment | No | Yes |
| Effective under ambient light conditions | No | Yes |
| Pseudocoloring | No | Yes (green) |
| Fluorescence image presented in | Black and white | 1. Black and white |
PDE Photo Dynamic Eye, LED light-emitting diode, CCD charge-coupled device
Pre- and intraoperative sentinel node identification findings and pathology results
| Direct camera comparison | Evaluation of m-PDE | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| c-PDE | m-PDE | ||
|
| |||
| Patients | 7 | 20 | |
| Average age, years (range) | 64.6 (58–74) | 54.4 (34–81) | |
| Male/female ratio | 5/2 | 14/6 | |
| Tumor type + tumor stage | |||
| SCC, oral cavity | 4 | 2 | |
| T1 | 4 | 2 | |
| Melanoma (head and neck, trunk, or extremity) | 3 (1, 1, 1) | 13 (10, 1, 2) | |
| Average Breslow thickness, mm (range) | 1.6 (1.2–2.1) | 2.1 (0.6–4.0) | |
| Ulceration, yes/no | 0/3 | 3/10 | |
| SCC, penis | – | 5 | |
| T1 | – | 2 | |
| T2 | – | 3 | |
|
| |||
| Average injected dose, MBq (range) | 69.6 (62.1–77.1) | 80.6 (67.3–156) | |
| Preoperative number of SNs identified using SPECT/CT (average, range) | 21 (3, 2–5) | 51 (2.6, 1–6) | |
| No. of basins (% total), no. of SNs (% total) | 16 (100), 21 (100) | 40 (100), 51 (100) | |
| Head | 1 (6.3), 1 (4.8) | 5 (12.5), 6 (11.8) | |
| Auricular | – | – | |
| Parotid gland | – | 2 (5.0), 3 (5.9) | |
| Neck (level I–V) | 11 (68.8), 15 (71.4) | 19 (47.5), 23 (45.1) | |
| Axilla | 2 (12.5), 2 (9.5) | 2 (5.0), 2 (3.9) | |
| Supraclavicular | – | 1 (2.5), 1 (2.0) | |
| Scapular | 1 (6.3), 1 (4.8) | – | |
| Groin | 1 (6.3), 2 (9.5) | 11 (27.5), 16 (31.4) | |
| Average time injection – operation, hrs (range) | 5.5 (4.3–6.5) | 6.4 (3.5–19.5) | |
|
| |||
| No. of intraoperatively excised SNs (average, range) | 27 (3.9, 2–7) | 73 (3.7, 1–7) | |
| Radioactive | 27 | 73 | |
| Fluorescent | 27 | 73 | |
| Blue | 1a | 12b | |
|
| |||
| Visibility through skin | 6 (22.2) [2] | 11 (40.7) [4] | 26 (35.6) [11] |
| Per basin: | |||
| Head | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Auricular | – | – | 1 |
| Parotid gland | – | – | 2 |
| Neck (level I–V) | 5 | 5 | 17 |
| Axilla | – | 2 | 2 |
| Supraclavicular | – | – | – |
| Scapular | – | 1 | – |
| Groin | – | 2 | 3 |
| Visibility in vivo (prior to excision) | 22 (81.4) [6] | 27 (100) [7] | 75 (100) [20] |
| Per basin: | |||
| Head | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| Auricular | – | – | 1 |
| Parotid gland | – | – | 8 |
| Neck (level I–V) | 19 | 21 | 35 |
| Axilla | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| Supraclavicular | – | – | 4 |
| Scapular | 1 | 1 | – |
| Groin | 0 | 2 | 18 |
| Visibility lymphatic duct | – | 2 (7.4) [2] | 33 (45.2) [13] |
| Per basin: | |||
| Head | – | – | 2 |
| Auricular | – | – | 1 |
| Parotid gland | – | – | 4 |
| Neck (level I–V) | – | 2 | 15 |
| Axilla | – | – | 2 |
| Supraclavicular | – | – | 4 |
| Scapular | – | – | – |
| Groin | – | – | – |
|
| |||
| No. of tumor-positive SNs (% total) | 0/34 | 4/91 (4.4) | |
| No. of tumor-positive patients (% total) | 0/7 | 4/20 (20.0) | |
PDE Photo Dynamic Eye, SCC squamous cell carcinoma, MBq mega becquerel, SN sentinel node, SPECT/CT single photon emission computed tomography combined with computed tomography
aIn two patients blue dye was used. Here 2 SNs were excised of which 1 was blue at the time of excision
bIn two patients blue dye was used. Here 2 SNs were excised of which were both blue at the time of excision
Fig. 1Workflow for sentinel node localization and excision. Following preoperative image analysis by the surgeon to virtually determine the location of the SNs (1), blue dye can be injected (2). Prior to incision a portable gamma camera (Sentinella; Oncovision, Valencia, Spain), a gamma probe (Neoprobe; Johnson & Johnson Medical, Hamburg, Germany), and the fluorescence camera (c-PDE or m-PDE; Hamamatsu Photonics K.K., Hamamatsu, Japan) are use to determine the location of the SNs (3). After incision (4) the SN is pursued via gamma tracing, after which alternating attempts were made to visualize the SN via fluorescence imaging and, when applicable, blue-dye visualization (5). After identification of the SN, the node was excised, after which the wound bed was checked for the presence of residual radioactivity/remaining fluorescence activity at the site of a previously excised SN. Additionally excised nodes were considered part of a cluster of multiple adjacent SNs (6). Following completion of SN biopsy via the combined radio- and fluorescence-guided (and, when applicable, blue dye) approach, the wound-bed was palpated for the presence of suspicious non-radioactive, non-fluorescent and, when applicable, non-blue-dye-stained lymph nodes (8). Thereafter the wound bed was closed (9). SN sentinel node, PDE Photo Dynamic Eye
Fig. 2Determination of the sensitivity of the m-PDE and c-PDE fluorescence camera systems for ICG–HSA. (a) Fluorescence intensity curve of the various steps of the dilution range measured with the IVIS Spectrum. (b) Visual fluorescence images obtained with the IVIS Spectrum, c-PDE, and m-PDE when measured in full darkness, with all lights in the operating room turned on (satellite lamps, plenum, and surrounding lights), and with the satellite lamps directly lighting the sterile field turned off, but the plenum and surrounding lights on. (c) Light spectrum of the lamps present in the operating room. The light blue area shows the area in which ICG emits its light. (d) Absorption and emission spectrum of 1.50 × 10−9 M ICG–HSA. ICG indocyanine green, HSA human serum albumin, PDE Photo Dynamic Eye
Fig. 3Fluorescence-guided sentinel node excision in a patient with a melanoma of the neck. (a) Preoperative imaging. Left Static lymphoscintigram acquired 2 h after hybrid tracer injection showing only the IS. Middle Following fusion of the acquired SPECT and CT images, a 3D volume rendering was generated showing the injection site, as well as an SN in level IV (white arrow) and a supraclavicular SN. Right Axial fused SPECT/CT (left) and CT (right) slice showing the SN in level IV being part of a cluster (indicated because no clear node could be identified on the CT, only a strand of tissue). (b) After re-excision of the melanoma scar, the SN cluster in level IV was pursued via fluorescence imaging using the m-PDE fluorescence camera. The timeline shows fluorescence-guided excision of this cluster of SNs. Switching between the fluorescence and white light image allowed the surgeon to work under continuous fluorescence guidance. A total of three fluorescent (and radioactive) SNs were removed from the area where the hotspot was seen on SPECT/CT imaging. IS injection site, SN sentinel node, SPECT/CT single photon emission computed tomography combined with computed tomography, 3D three-dimensional