Literature DB >> 20619581

A novel method of measuring human lymphatic pumping using indocyanine green fluorescence lymphography.

Naoki Unno1, Motohiro Nishiyama, Minoru Suzuki, Hiroki Tanaka, Naoto Yamamoto, Daisuke Sagara, Yuuki Mano, Hiroyuki Konno.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Lymph transportation through the body is partly controlled by the intrinsic pumping of lymphatic vessels. Although an understanding of this process is important for medical application, little is currently known because it is difficult to measure. Here, we introduce an easy, safe, and cost-effective technique for measuring lymphatic pumping in leg superficial lymphatic vessels. Readings obtained with this technique were compared with values obtained with dynamic lymphoscintigraphy. Differences in lymphatic pumping between healthy volunteers and patients with lymphedema were also investigated.
METHODS: Indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence lymphography was performed by subcutaneously injecting 0.3 mL of ICG (0.5%) into the dorsum of the foot. Real-time fluorescence images of lymph propulsion were obtained with an infrared-light camera system with the individual supine or sitting. A custom-made transparent sphygmomanometer cuff was wrapped around the lower leg and connected to a standard mercury sphygmomanometer. The cuff was inflated to 60 mm Hg and then gradually deflated at 5-minute intervals to lower the pressure by 10-mm Hg steps until the fluorescence contrast agent exceeded the upper border of the cuff, indicating that the lymphatic contraction had overcome the cuff pressure. Lymph pumping pressure (P(pump)) was defined as the value of the cuff pressure when the contrast agent exceeded the upper border of the cuff. We measured P(pump) among healthy volunteers who maintained a supine position and compared these values with measurements obtained from lymphoscintigraphy. P(pump) values while sitting were also compared between 30 legs from healthy volunteers and 30 legs from lymphedematous patients.
RESULTS: Among healthy, supine participants, P(pump) was 25.2 ± 16.7 mm Hg (mean ± standard deviation [SD]) when measured by ICG fluorescence lymphography. These values were significantly correlated with values taken using dynamic lymphoscintigraphy (r(2) = 0.54, p < .01), while 2 SDs of the mean were approximately 20 mm Hg, suggesting a substantial disagreement between the two methods (Bland-Altman plots). In the comparison of seated measurements, readings for healthy participants (P(pump) = 29.3 ± 16.0) were higher than those for lymphedematous participants (13.2 ± 14.9).
CONCLUSION: ICG fluorescence is an accurate-as well as a safe, easy, and economical-method of measuring lymphatic pumping. Therefore, it may develop as a vital tool for diagnosing lymphatic malfunctions even when they are only in their formative stages. Studies that use this technique may increase our knowledge of the lymphatic system as a whole, allowing us to develop better treatments for lymphatic disorders.
Copyright © 2010 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20619581     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.04.067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  30 in total

1.  The relationship between lymphangion chain length and maximum pressure generation established through in vivo imaging and computational modeling.

Authors:  Mohammad S Razavi; Tyler S Nelson; Zhanna Nepiyushchikh; Rudolph L Gleason; J Brandon Dixon
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 4.733

Review 2.  Advances in fluorescent-image guided surgery.

Authors:  Mark J Landau; Daniel J Gould; Ketan M Patel
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-10

3.  Intraoperative lymph mapping with preoperative vein mapping to prevent postoperative lymphorrhea following paramalleolar bypass surgery in patients with critical limb ischemia.

Authors:  Naoki Unno; Naoto Yamamoto; Minoru Suzuki; Hiroki Tanaka; Yuuki Mano; Masaki Sano; Takaaki Saito; Ryota Sugisawa; Hiroyuki Konno
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  Sensitivity analysis of near-infrared functional lymphatic imaging.

Authors:  Michael Weiler; Timothy Kassis; J Brandon Dixon
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.170

5.  Quantitative measurement of lymphatic function in mice by noninvasive near-infrared imaging of a peripheral vein.

Authors:  Steven T Proulx; Qiaoli Ma; Diana Andina; Jean-Christophe Leroux; Michael Detmar
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2017-01-12

6.  VIPAR, a quantitative approach to 3D histopathology applied to lymphatic malformations.

Authors:  René Hägerling; Dominik Drees; Aaron Scherzinger; Cathrin Dierkes; Silvia Martin-Almedina; Stefan Butz; Kristiana Gordon; Michael Schäfers; Klaus Hinrichs; Pia Ostergaard; Dietmar Vestweber; Tobias Goerge; Sahar Mansour; Xiaoyi Jiang; Peter S Mortimer; Friedemann Kiefer
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2017-08-17

7.  A mathematical model of intestinal oedema formation.

Authors:  Jennifer Young; Béatrice Rivière; Charles S Cox; Karen Uray
Journal:  Math Med Biol       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 1.854

8.  Minimally invasive method for determining the effective lymphatic pumping pressure in rats using near-infrared imaging.

Authors:  Tyler S Nelson; Ryan E Akin; Michael J Weiler; Timothy Kassis; Jeffrey A Kornuta; J Brandon Dixon
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 3.619

9.  Near-Infrared Fluorescence Lymphatic Imaging in Lymphangiomatosis.

Authors:  John C Rasmussen; Caroline E Fife; Eva M Sevick-Muraca
Journal:  Lymphat Res Biol       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 2.589

10.  In vivo quantification of lymph viscosity and pressure in lymphatic vessels and draining lymph nodes of arthritic joints in mice.

Authors:  Echoe M Bouta; Ronald W Wood; Edward B Brown; Homaira Rahimi; Christopher T Ritchlin; Edward M Schwarz
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 5.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.