Literature DB >> 27020113

Electron spin relaxation in cryptochrome-based magnetoreception.

Daniel R Kattnig1, Ilia A Solov'yov, P J Hore.   

Abstract

The magnetic compass sense of migratory birds is thought to rely on magnetically sensitive radical pairs formed photochemically in cryptochrome proteins in the retina. An important requirement of this hypothesis is that electron spin relaxation is slow enough for the Earth's magnetic field to have a significant effect on the coherent spin dynamics of the radicals. It is generally assumed that evolutionary pressure has led to protection of the electron spins from irreversible loss of coherence in order that the underlying quantum dynamics can survive in a noisy biological environment. Here, we address this question for a structurally characterized model cryptochrome expected to share many properties with the putative avian receptor protein. To this end we combine all-atom molecular dynamics simulations, Bloch-Redfield relaxation theory and spin dynamics calculations to assess the effects of spin relaxation on the performance of the protein as a compass sensor. Both flavin-tryptophan and flavin-Z˙ radical pairs are studied (Z˙ is a radical with no hyperfine interactions). Relaxation is considered to arise from modulation of hyperfine interactions by librational motions of the radicals and fluctuations in certain dihedral angles. For Arabidopsis thaliana cryptochrome 1 (AtCry1) we find that spin relaxation implies optimal radical pair lifetimes of the order of microseconds, and that flavin-Z˙ pairs are less affected by relaxation than flavin-tryptophan pairs. Our results also demonstrate that spin relaxation in isolated AtCry1 is incompatible with the long coherence times that have been postulated to explain the disruption of the avian magnetic compass sense by weak radiofrequency magnetic fields. We conclude that a cryptochrome sensor in vivo would have to differ dynamically, if not structurally, from isolated AtCry1. Our results clearly mark the limits of the current hypothesis and lead to a better understanding of the operation of radical pair magnetic sensors in noisy biological environments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27020113     DOI: 10.1039/c5cp06731f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys        ISSN: 1463-9076            Impact factor:   3.676


  24 in total

Review 1.  Magnetocarcinogenesis: is there a mechanism for carcinogenic effects of weak magnetic fields?

Authors:  Jukka Juutilainen; Mikko Herrala; Jukka Luukkonen; Jonne Naarala; P J Hore
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Proposal to use superparamagnetic nanoparticles to test the role of cryptochrome in magnetoreception.

Authors:  Susannah Bourne Worster; P J Hore
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Electromagnetic 0.1-100 kHz noise does not disrupt orientation in a night-migrating songbird implying a spin coherence lifetime of less than 10 µs.

Authors:  Dmitry Kobylkov; Joe Wynn; Michael Winklhofer; Raisa Chetverikova; Jingjing Xu; Hamish Hiscock; P J Hore; Henrik Mouritsen
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Double cones in the avian retina form an oriented mosaic which might facilitate magnetoreception and/or polarized light sensing.

Authors:  Raisa Chetverikova; Glen Dautaj; Leonard Schwigon; Karin Dedek; Henrik Mouritsen
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Atomistic Insights into Cryptochrome Interprotein Interactions.

Authors:  Sarafina M Kimø; Ida Friis; Ilia A Solov'yov
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Ultrafast flavin/tryptophan radical pair kinetics in a magnetically sensitive artificial protein.

Authors:  Chris Bialas; David T Barnard; Dirk B Auman; Rylee A McBride; Lauren E Jarocha; P J Hore; P Leslie Dutton; Robert J Stanley; Christopher C Moser
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 3.676

7.  A light-dependent magnetoreception mechanism insensitive to light intensity and polarization.

Authors:  Susannah Worster; Henrik Mouritsen; P J Hore
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  Alzheimer's and Consciousness: How Much Subjectivity Is Objective?

Authors:  Vladan Bajic; Natasa Misic; Ivana Stankovic; Bozidarka Zaric; George Perry
Journal:  Neurosci Insights       Date:  2021-07-20

9.  Disruption of Magnetic Compass Orientation in Migratory Birds by Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields.

Authors:  Hamish G Hiscock; Henrik Mouritsen; David E Manolopoulos; P J Hore
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  Magnetic sensitivity of cryptochrome 4 from a migratory songbird.

Authors:  Jingjing Xu; Lauren E Jarocha; Tilo Zollitsch; Marcin Konowalczyk; Kevin B Henbest; Sabine Richert; Matthew J Golesworthy; Jessica Schmidt; Victoire Déjean; Daniel J C Sowood; Marco Bassetto; Jiate Luo; Jessica R Walton; Jessica Fleming; Yujing Wei; Tommy L Pitcher; Gabriel Moise; Maike Herrmann; Hang Yin; Haijia Wu; Rabea Bartölke; Stefanie J Käsehagen; Simon Horst; Glen Dautaj; Patrick D F Murton; Angela S Gehrckens; Yogarany Chelliah; Joseph S Takahashi; Karl-Wilhelm Koch; Stefan Weber; Ilia A Solov'yov; Can Xie; Stuart R Mackenzie; Christiane R Timmel; Henrik Mouritsen; P J Hore
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.