Literature DB >> 27014776

The troubling science of neurophenomenology.

James Head1, William S Helton2.   

Abstract

Researchers suggest links between mind-wandering and impaired processing of external task stimuli: mind-wandering results in perceptual decoupling. The primary methodology employed to investigate the effects of mind-wandering requires people to report their conscious state and then predicts prior behavior or neurophysiological responses using the person's self-report. Unfortunately, this method employs reports that occur after the behavior occurs. An alternative methodology employs a word displayed prior to a performance check or catch trial. After the catch trial, participants then report their awareness of the word occurring, attempt to recognize the word, and also report whether they were on- or off-task. We show that participants' explicit and implicit awareness of the pre-catch trial word is independent of self-reports of conscious state. This finding conflicts with the perspective that mind-wandering reports indicate perceptual decoupling. Reports of mind-wandering may alternatively be how people explain behavioral outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cognitive effort; Mindlessness; Perceptual decoupling; Sustained attention; Vigilance

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27014776     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-016-4623-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  21 in total

1.  Subjective experience and the attentional lapse: task engagement and disengagement during sustained attention.

Authors:  Jonathan Smallwood; John B Davies; Derek Heim; Frances Finnigan; Megan Sudberry; Rory O'Connor; Marc Obonsawin
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2004-12

2.  The neural bases of momentary lapses in attention.

Authors:  D H Weissman; K C Roberts; K M Visscher; M G Woldorff
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2006-06-11       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Wandering minds: the default network and stimulus-independent thought.

Authors:  Malia F Mason; Michael I Norton; John D Van Horn; Daniel M Wegner; Scott T Grafton; C Neil Macrae
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-01-19       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Counting the cost of an absent mind: mind wandering as an underrecognized influence on educational performance.

Authors:  Jonathan Smallwood; Daniel J Fishman; Jonathan W Schooler
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-04

5.  Perceptual decoupling or motor decoupling?

Authors:  James Head; William S Helton
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2013-07-07

6.  The new statistics: why and how.

Authors:  Geoff Cumming
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-11-12

7.  Why hypothesis tests are essential for psychological science: a comment on Cumming (2014).

Authors:  Richard D Morey; Jeffrey N Rouder; Josine Verhagen; Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2014-03-06

8.  Sustained attention failures are primarily due to sustained cognitive load not task monotony.

Authors:  James Head; William S Helton
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2014-10-10

9.  Impaired sustained attention and error awareness in traumatic brain injury: implications for insight.

Authors:  Laura McAvinue; Fiadhnait O'Keeffe; Deirdre McMackin; Ian H Robertson
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rehabil       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.868

10.  Target predictability, sustained attention, and response inhibition.

Authors:  Leonie Carter; Paul N Russell; William S Helton
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2013-03-16       Impact factor: 2.310

View more
  7 in total

1.  Special topic introduction: understanding engagement: mind-wandering, boredom and attention.

Authors:  James Danckert
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  You are measuring the decision to be fast, not inattention: the Sustained Attention to Response Task does not measure sustained attention.

Authors:  Jasmine S Dang; Ivonne J Figueroa; William S Helton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Confident failures: Lapses of working memory reveal a metacognitive blind spot.

Authors:  Kirsten C S Adam; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Go-stimuli probability influences response bias in the sustained attention to response task: a signal detection theory perspective.

Authors:  Aman Bedi; Paul N Russell; William S Helton
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2022-04-11

5.  Testing the construct validity of competing measurement approaches to probed mind-wandering reports.

Authors:  Michael J Kane; Bridget A Smeekens; Matt E Meier; Matthew S Welhaf; Natalie E Phillips
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-04-09

6.  Alpha oscillations and stimulus-evoked activity dissociate metacognitive reports of attention, visibility, and confidence in a rapid visual detection task.

Authors:  Matthew J Davidson; James S P Macdonald; Nick Yeung
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 2.004

7.  Out of the Loop, in Your Bubble: Mind Wandering Is Independent From Automation Reliability, but Influences Task Engagement.

Authors:  Jonas Gouraud; Arnaud Delorme; Bruno Berberian
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 3.169

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.