Literature DB >> 25310454

Sustained attention failures are primarily due to sustained cognitive load not task monotony.

James Head1, William S Helton2.   

Abstract

We conducted two studies using a modified sustained attention to response task (SART) to investigate the developmental process of SART performance and the role of cognitive load on performance when the speed-accuracy trade-off is controlled experimentally. In study 1, 23 participants completed the modified SART (target stimuli location was not predictable) and a subjective thought content questionnaire 4 times over the span of 4 weeks. As predicted, the influence of speed-accuracy trade-off was significantly mitigated on the modified SART by having target stimuli occur in unpredictable locations. In study 2, 21 of the 23 participants completed an abridged version of the modified SART with a verbal free-recall memory task. Participants performed significantly worse when completing the verbal memory task and SART concurrently. Overall, the results support a resource theory perspective with concern to errors being a result of limited mental resources and not simply mindlessness per se.
Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attention; Mindlessness; Monotony; Sustained attention; Vigilance

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25310454     DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.09.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  12 in total

1.  A new semantic vigilance task: vigilance decrement, workload, and sensitivity to dual-task costs.

Authors:  Samantha L Epling; Paul N Russell; William S Helton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Recent theoretical, neural, and clinical advances in sustained attention research.

Authors:  Francesca C Fortenbaugh; Joseph DeGutis; Michael Esterman
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2017-03-05       Impact factor: 5.691

3.  Interference between a fast-paced spatial puzzle task and verbal memory demands.

Authors:  Samantha L Epling; Megan J Blakely; Paul N Russell; William S Helton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The troubling science of neurophenomenology.

Authors:  James Head; William S Helton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Addiction vulnerability and the processing of significant cues: Sign-, but not goal-, tracker perceptual sensitivity relies on cue salience.

Authors:  Kyra B Phillips; Martin Sarter
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 1.912

6.  Relationship Between Task-Based and Parent Report-Based Measures of Attention and Executive Function in Children with Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders (FASD).

Authors:  Julia T Mattson; John C Thorne; Sara T Kover
Journal:  J Pediatr Neuropsychol       Date:  2020-06-30

7.  The effects of task-irrelevant threatening stimuli on orienting- and executive attentional processes under cognitive load.

Authors:  Andras N Zsidó; Diana T Stecina; Rebecca Cseh; Michael C Hout
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2021-11-12

8.  Restoration of Attention by Rest in a Multitasking World: Theory, Methodology, and Empirical Evidence.

Authors:  Frank Schumann; Michael B Steinborn; Jens Kürten; Liyu Cao; Barbara Friederike Händel; Lynn Huestegge
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-04-01

9.  Probe-caught spontaneous and deliberate mind wandering in relation to self-reported inattentive, hyperactive and impulsive traits in adults.

Authors:  Gizem Arabacı; Benjamin A Parris
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Continuous Performance Tasks: Not Just About Sustaining Attention.

Authors:  Hettie Roebuck; Claudia Freigang; Johanna G Barry
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.