Literature DB >> 23838467

Perceptual decoupling or motor decoupling?

James Head1, William S Helton.   

Abstract

The current investigation was conducted to elucidate whether errors of commission in the Sustained Attention to Response Task (SART) are indicators of perceptual or motor decoupling. Twenty-eight participants completed SARTs with motor and perceptual aspects of the task manipulated. The participants completed four different SART blocks whereby stimuli location uncertainty and stimuli acquisition were manipulated. In previous studies of more traditional sustained attention tasks stimuli location uncertainty reduces sustained attention performance. In the case of the SART the motor manipulation (stimuli acquisition), but not the perceptual manipulation (stimuli location uncertainty) significantly reduced commission errors. The results suggest that the majority of SART commission errors are likely to be indicators of motor decoupling not necessarily perceptual decoupling.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Motor control; Motor decoupling; Perceptual decoupling; Response inhibition; SART; Sustained attention

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23838467     DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2013.06.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conscious Cogn        ISSN: 1053-8100


  11 in total

1.  Practice does not make perfect in a modified sustained attention to response task.

Authors:  James Head; William S Helton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The effects of warning cues and attention-capturing stimuli on the sustained attention to response task.

Authors:  Kristin M Finkbeiner; Kyle M Wilson; Paul N Russell; William S Helton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  You are measuring the decision to be fast, not inattention: the Sustained Attention to Response Task does not measure sustained attention.

Authors:  Jasmine S Dang; Ivonne J Figueroa; William S Helton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The troubling science of neurophenomenology.

Authors:  James Head; William S Helton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The effects of real-time performance feedback and performance emphasis on the sustained attention to response task (SART).

Authors:  Justin M Mensen; Jasmine S Dang; Andrew J Stets; William S Helton
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-10-08

6.  Anxiety-mediated facilitation of behavioral inhibition: Threat processing and defensive reactivity during a go/no-go task.

Authors:  Christian Grillon; Oliver J Robinson; Marissa Krimsky; Katherine O'Connell; Gabriella Alvarez; Monique Ernst
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2016-09-19

7.  Cognitive Fatigue Influences Time-On-Task during Bodyweight Resistance Training Exercise.

Authors:  James R Head; Matthew S Tenan; Andrew J Tweedell; Thomas F Price; Michael E LaFiandra; William S Helton
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 4.566

8.  Go-stimuli proportion influences response strategy in a sustained attention to response task.

Authors:  Kyle M Wilson; Kristin M Finkbeiner; Neil R de Joux; Paul N Russell; William S Helton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Probe-caught spontaneous and deliberate mind wandering in relation to self-reported inattentive, hyperactive and impulsive traits in adults.

Authors:  Gizem Arabacı; Benjamin A Parris
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Prior Mental Fatigue Impairs Marksmanship Decision Performance.

Authors:  James Head; Matthew S Tenan; Andrew J Tweedell; Michael E LaFiandra; Frank Morelli; Kyle M Wilson; Samson V Ortega; William S Helton
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 4.566

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.