Atomic layer deposition allows the fabrication of BaTiO3 (BTO) ultrathin films with tunable dielectric properties, which is a promising material for electronic and optical technology. Industrial applicability necessitates a better understanding of their atomic structure and corresponding properties. Through the use of element-specific X-ray absorption near edge structure (XANES) analysis, O K-edge of BTO as a function of cation composition and underlying substrate (RuO2 and SiO2) is revealed. By employing density functional theory and multiple scattering simulations, we analyze the distortions in BTO's bonding environment captured by the XANES spectra. The spectral weight shifts to lower energy with increasing Ti content and provides an atomic scale (microscopic) explanation for the increase in leakage current density. Differences in film morphologies in the first few layers near substrate-film interfaces reveal BTO's homogeneous growth on RuO2 and its distorted growth on SiO2. This work links structural changes to BTO thin-film properties and provides insight necessary for optimizing future BTO and other ternary metal oxide-based thin-film devices.
Atomic layer deposition allows the fabrication of BaTiO3 (BTO) ultrathin films with tunable dielectric properties, which is a promising material for electronic and optical technology. Industrial applicability necessitates a better understanding of their atomic structure and corresponding properties. Through the use of element-specific X-ray absorption near edge structure (XANES) analysis, O K-edge of BTO as a function of cation composition and underlying substrate (RuO2 and SiO2) is revealed. By employing density functional theory and multiple scattering simulations, we analyze the distortions in BTO's bonding environment captured by the XANES spectra. The spectral weight shifts to lower energy with increasing Ti content and provides an atomic scale (microscopic) explanation for the increase in leakage current density. Differences in film morphologies in the first few layers near substrate-film interfaces reveal BTO's homogeneous growth on RuO2 and its distorted growth on SiO2. This work links structural changes to BTO thin-film properties and provides insight necessary for optimizing future BTO and other ternary metal oxide-based thin-film devices.
The perovskite BaTiO3 (BTO) exhibits high dielectric constants,[1,2] ferroelectricity,[3] piezoelectricity,[4] and photorefractive effects,[5] making
it a promising material for electronic and optical devices. Using
atomic layer deposition (ALD), BTO can be deposited as a ternary compound
employing sequential BaO and TiO2 cycles,[6−8] allowing for atomic level control of thickness, composition, and
crystallinity.[9] Together with ALD’s
unique self-limiting surface reactions,[10] researchers foresee its potential in dynamic random-access memory
applications,[11,12] in which BTO, conformally coated
on high-aspect ratio trenches, may decisively contribute to increasing
the memory density necessary for further device miniaturization. However,
approaching the nanometer regime, key questions regarding the electronic
structure determining the films’ properties remain.As
for MgO/ZnO and Al2O3/ZnO ALD,[13,14] metal-oxide (MO) ALD typically renders multicomponent nanolaminate
stacks with different materials spatially localized in discrete layers
separated by sharp boundaries.[15] This characteristic
is beneficial for BTO’s substrate interface. However, its deposition
as a ternary MO-ALD (ABO) film gives rise to a conflicting
condition; the fabrication now requires mixing binary A–O and
B–O layer deposition cycles in a way to obtain the desired
stoichiometry.[6,7,12,16] Postprocess annealing facilitates the formation
of intermixed crystalline structures;[12,17] however, depending
on the substrate, this may result in diffusion and subsequent interfacial
layer mixing, eventually compromising film quality.[18] It is not clear how the local bonding environment changes
when employing a ternary MO deposition technique, to what extent BaO
and TiO2 mix, and how the substrate induces strain in the
film.BTO thin films’ morphological and electronic properties,
such as crystallinity, refractive index, dielectric constant, and
leakage currents, are different from the bulk and hard to predict.[19−21] Tuning the composition of ALDBTO, researchers examined the rise
of leakage current with Ti content and a dielectric constant maximum
at stoichiometry.[7] Postprocess annealing
partly crystallizes and densifies the as-deposited amorphous film,
increasing its capacitance.[8,17] However, a chemical
and structural explanation of these application-relevant findings
is missing.X-ray absorption near edge structure (XANES) is
an emerging, powerful
and promising characterization technique for compositional effects[22] and interfaces[23] in
ultrathin ALD films. Its elemental specificity allows the probing
of amorphous and crystalline films.[24,25] XANES provides
oxidation states, coordination chemistry, molecular orbitals, and
band structure, as well as local displacement and chemical short-range
orders.[26] Analyzing the O K-edge of ALDBTO films, we investigate the mixing of the constituents TiO2 and BaO and look into structural changes with composition, thickness,
underlying substrate, and postprocess annealing. In addition, density
functional theory (DFT) and multiple scattering (MS) simulations allow
the derivation of structural estimates, which allow insight into the
structural changes leading to the obtained leakage current densities.(a) O
K-edge XANES spectra for ALD BaO, TiO2, and BTO
powder; stoichiometric ALDBTO, Ba-rich BTO, simulated Ba-rich BTO,
Ti-rich BTO, and simulated Ti-rich BTO (top to bottom). Simulated
spectra (dotted) are obtained using FEFF code[27,28] and were performed on a relaxed structure containing 7:1 (Ba-rich)
and 1:7 (Ti-rich) Ba:Ti. Spectra were background subtracted and atomically
normalized in the energy region from 539 to 548 eV. The reference
ALD sample for the O K-edge depicts five main features. (b) Theoretical
MS calculations as a function of the cluster size (number of shells:
3, 4, 6, 9, 11, and 24) for tetragonal BTO, where a shell refers to
a group of atoms at a particular distance from the absorbing atom.
The 24-shell cluster corresponds to a sphere with a radius of 10 Å.
The experimental stoichiometric ALDBTO is shown at the top as a reference.In Figure , we
first look at the top four O K-edge spectra of ALD BaO, TiO2, cubic powder BTO and nearly stoichiometric ALDBTO (Ba:Ti ∼
0.9; 10 nm; details about sample preparation are in the Supporting Information) deposited on RuO2. Without any further treatment, all of these ALDBTO samples
are amorphous after deposition.[6,8,17] Hence, the comparison provides insight into the mixing during BTO’s
thin-film deposition. We use the cubic BTO powder as a reference to
assign peaks.[29−31] Peaks A–E correspond to the electronic excitation
from O 1s states to several unoccupied states in the conduction band.
Peak A indicates a transition from O 1s to O 2p–Ti 3d hybridized
states, linking it to the t2g crystal field peak. This
is corroborated by the partial density of states (pDOS) calculation
(Figure a; details
of the crystal structure used for pDOS and calculation details are
shown in the Supporting Information, Table
S3 and Figure S6). The conduction band is mostly composed of these
states with minor contributions from Ba 5d, Ba 4f, and Ti 4p orbitals.
Peak A1 stems from the same transition and is visible in
our amorphous samples. It represents asymmetric Ti–O–Ti
bonding environments.[29] This is contrary
to the cubic BTO powder reference and hints toward a distortion. Feature
B resembles the eg crystal field peak, and peak C results
from a transition from O 1s to O 2p–Ba 5d hybridized states
along with strong MS contributions (Figure S7). Peaks D1 and D2 derive from an O 1s transition
to O 2p–Ba 4f states with MS contributions (Figure S7).
Figure 1
(a) O
K-edge XANES spectra for ALD BaO, TiO2, and BTO
powder; stoichiometric ALD BTO, Ba-rich BTO, simulated Ba-rich BTO,
Ti-rich BTO, and simulated Ti-rich BTO (top to bottom). Simulated
spectra (dotted) are obtained using FEFF code[27,28] and were performed on a relaxed structure containing 7:1 (Ba-rich)
and 1:7 (Ti-rich) Ba:Ti. Spectra were background subtracted and atomically
normalized in the energy region from 539 to 548 eV. The reference
ALD sample for the O K-edge depicts five main features. (b) Theoretical
MS calculations as a function of the cluster size (number of shells:
3, 4, 6, 9, 11, and 24) for tetragonal BTO, where a shell refers to
a group of atoms at a particular distance from the absorbing atom.
The 24-shell cluster corresponds to a sphere with a radius of 10 Å.
The experimental stoichiometric ALD BTO is shown at the top as a reference.
Figure 2
Simulated pDOS relative to the Fermi level in
comparison to the
respective experimental spectra. The total density of states is shifted
such that the onset of the band gap is at 0 eV, and the spectra are
aligned by matching the maximum intensity of the first peak to the
maximum pDOS intensity of the absorbing atom. (a) Stoichiometric BTO
showing mainly O 2p and Ti 3d hybridization with minimal orbital contributions
from Ba 5d, Ba 4f, and Ti 4p to the conduction band; (b) Ba-rich BTO
showing mainly O 2p–Ti 3d hybridized orbitals near the onset
and O 2p–Ba 5d–Ba 4f hybridization 12.5 eV after the
main edge; and (c) Ti-rich BTO showing the transition from O 1s to
O 2p–Ti 3d at the onset, and O 1s to O 2p–Ba 4f 14 eV
above the Fermi level.
BTO thin films with thickness below 50 nm
cannot become cubic even
when grown on substrates with similar perovskite lattices because
of biaxial substrate constraints.[32] Using
FEFF code, we therefore approached the stoichiometric ALDBTO structure
simulating O K-edge spectra for a tetragonal BTO as a function of
the cluster size (atomic shells of 3, 4, 6, 9, 11 and 24; Figure b, Table S3, and Figure S6a show details
on the tetragonal BTO input file). Feature E starts developing with
the fourth shell (short-range order), while feature D1 appears
from the sixth shell (midrange order); both features are predominantly
a result of MS. Interestingly, feature A splits into A and A1 in shell 11, indicating the asymmetric position of the nearest Ti
with respect to the excited O.[29] This distortion
of the TiO6 octahedron was theoretically predicted to evolve
in perovskites with sufficient distortion from the cubic phase, distortions
that include strain or defects in thin films.[30] It appears in our experimental stoichiometric and Ba-rich samples.
Despite this distortion, the ALDBTO bears resemblance to tetragonal
BTO. It cannot be derived from a linear combination of TiO2 and BaO (Figure S1a), indicating its
intermixed nature. Ba M5, M4 edge XANES spectra (Figure S4) further strengthen this argument. This confirms
earlier indications from X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy[6] (Figure S1c).Tailoring ALDBTO’s dielectric performance to device-specific
needs simply requires altering the BaO:TiO2 cycle ratio
within the deposition.[7] To understand the
electronic structure changes with composition, we deposited stoichiometric
(Ba:Ti ∼ 0.9, black), Ba-rich (∼1.4, solid red), and
Ti-rich (∼0.6, solid blue) films. Their O K-edge spectra can
be seen in Figure a. The dotted lines underneath the experimental BTO spectra illustrate
simulated O K-edge spectra obtained on relaxed BTO clusters derived
from DFT. Containing 7:1 (red) and 1:7 Ba:Ti (blue), the two BTO crystals
of compositional extremes (details in Table S3 and Figure S6) best match the experimental
spectra. The simulations capture salient features in the near-edge
X-ray absorption fine structure (NEXAFS) region; however, they do
not depict features at higher energy. A better match would require
simulating all possible local environments, which is not essential
for the properties investigated in this study.The Ba-rich (red)
sample has a weaker edge jump than the stoichiometric
one, a split of A into A and A1, a very intense peak B,
a low-intensity feature C, and a peak D1 that is most resolved
compared to all other samples. Features D2 and E remain
unchanged. Here, we observe a more discrete mixing of the pDOS. Distortion
of the structure lowers the hybridization, as can be seen in films
off-stoichiometry. The Ti 3d orbital contribution shifts to higher
energies (Figure b).
In contrast to the stoichiometric case, the conduction band comprises
Ti 4p and high-energy Ba 4f and 5d states hybridized with O 2p also.[31] The increase of B (marked by arrow) and a splitting
of A derives from Ti–O–Ti asymmetric bond distances
in the BTO lattice, leading to a more pronounced electron density
depletion on one side of Ti than on the other.[29] This lattice distortion seems larger with more Ba content,
which is also observable in the pre-edge of Ti L3 spectra (Figure S3a). The onset of the simulated Ba-rich
spectra occurs at higher energy than the experimental Ba-rich case.
Though this shift is not as apparent in the experimental Ba-rich sample,
it provides a qualitative explanation of the higher band gap (Table S2) and lower leakage current density (Figure ).
Figure 4
(a) Dielectric
constant (black squares, 1 KHz frequency, 0 V applied
bias) and corresponding leakage currents densities (red squares, +
1.6 V applied bias) of stoichiometric, Ba-rich, and Ti-rich BTO samples;
MIM capacitor (Pt/BTO/RuO2/Ru) with BTO thickness of 15
nm, plasma treated for 3 h. Note that leakage current densities under
positive bias means electrons are injected from the bottom Ru substrate
to BTO. Standard deviation is reported for 5 measurements in each
case. (b) The total DOS with increasing Ba content (bandgap region).
In contrast,
the intensity ratio of A to B becomes larger (marked
by arrow) in the Ti-rich sample (blue). Feature A1 is not
present, either because the strong feature A masks A1 or
no splitting occurs. Features C–E appear similar to the stoichiometric
reference. The low-energy shift of the major Ti 3d orbital contribution
to BTO’s conduction band raises feature A (pDOS in Figure c). Similar to the
Ba-rich case, we also observe Ba 4f and 5d contributions at higher
energies. However, the onset of the simulated curve is now earlier
and the spectral weight shifts to lower energies towards the beginning
of the spectrum. The band gap decreases with the Ti content, which
is in agreement with experimental findings on band gap (Table S2) and the obtained leakage current density
(Figure ).[7]XANES and pDOS calculations therefore allow
explaining compositional
effects to BTO’s band gap and their relation to the obtainable
leakage current density.Simulated pDOS relative to the Fermi level in
comparison to the
respective experimental spectra. The total density of states is shifted
such that the onset of the band gap is at 0 eV, and the spectra are
aligned by matching the maximum intensity of the first peak to the
maximum pDOS intensity of the absorbing atom. (a) Stoichiometric BTO
showing mainly O 2p and Ti 3d hybridization with minimal orbital contributions
from Ba 5d, Ba 4f, and Ti 4p to the conduction band; (b) Ba-rich BTO
showing mainly O 2p–Ti 3d hybridized orbitals near the onset
and O 2p–Ba 5d–Ba 4f hybridization 12.5 eV after the
main edge; and (c) Ti-rich BTO showing the transition from O 1s to
O 2p–Ti 3d at the onset, and O 1s to O 2p–Ba 4f 14 eV
above the Fermi level.In addition to the composition, the underlying substrate
can largely
affect thin-film BTO’s properties; such properties are markedly
different from those of the bulk material due to strain or diffusion
at the substrate interface.[32,33] Here, we compare the
O K-edge of 10 nm thick stoichiometric BTO films deposited onto SiO2 and RuO2 substrates (Figure a), the preferred substrates for thin-film
BTO device fabrication.[6,7,17] Auger
electron yield (AEY) and total electron yield (TEY) provide information
on the film’s surface and bulk, respectively. For comparison,
the O K-edge of native RuO2 and SiO2 is shown
above and below the respective BTO spectra.
Figure 3
(a) TEY and AEY O K-edges
XANES spectra of 10 nm stoichiometric
BTO grown on RuO2 (blue) and SiO2 (red), plotted
with the O K-edge of bare RuO2 (light blue) and SiO2 (light red) as references. (b) O K-edge of stoichiometric,
Ba-rich and Ti-rich samples before and after 3 h of O2 plasma
treatment (250 W, 15 mTorr). Light and dark colors indicate samples
before and after plasma treatment, respectively.
(a) TEY and AEY O K-edges
XANES spectra of 10 nm stoichiometric
BTO grown on RuO2 (blue) and SiO2 (red), plotted
with the O K-edge of bare RuO2 (light blue) and SiO2 (light red) as references. (b) O K-edge of stoichiometric,
Ba-rich and Ti-rich samples before and after 3 h of O2 plasma
treatment (250 W, 15 mTorr). Light and dark colors indicate samples
before and after plasma treatment, respectively.The RuO2 reference spectrum (light blue) is similar
to that in the literature.[34,35] The first broad feature
(534–536 eV) derives from the excitation of O 1s into O 2p
and Ru 4d hybridized states, whereas the higher-energy feature (starting
from 543 eV) shows O 2p–Ru 5sp hybridized states. The TEY and
the AEY of BTO grown on RuO2 (blue) share the same features,
which suggests that BTO’s structure in the first few layers
near the substrate interface is similar to the one on the surface.
The SiO2 reference spectrum (light red) has all the characteristic
peaks described in the literature,[36] mainly
consisting of an excitation of O 2p–Si 3p hybridized orbitals
(535–540 eV). The AEY spectrum of BTO grown on RuO2 (blue) and on SiO2 (red) are similar, whereas the respective
TEY spectra differ. The bonding environment deeper in the film is
different in the higher-energy region of the spectrum (from 538 eV).RuO2 readily reacts with a wide range of metal precursors
leading to the formation of interfacial mixed MO films (BaTiRuO, intermediate of BTO and RuO2)[12] with lattices similar to the
BTO film. This minimizes interfacial strain.[37] On the other hand, formation of an interfacial layer is less likely
on a stable SiO2.[7] The lattice
mismatch at the interface may cause the growth of a strained film,
inducing distortions to the BTO structure, distortions that decrease
with film thickness because of the relaxation of dislocations.The “critical thickness” at which BTO is completely
relaxed is inversely proportional to the lattice mismatch and depends
on the substrate.[38] We compare 5, 10, and
15 nm thick stoichiometric samples deposited on RuO2 and
SiO2. We do not observe a trend in the O K-edge (Figure S2) nor in the Ti L3 and L2 edges (Figure S3b) on either substrate. Hence, relaxation
events in the reported thickness regime seem unlikely. Studies on
larger thickness variations might reveal the substrate-specific “critical
thicknesses.” At the vacuum interface, the film may still adopt
a relaxed structure when deposited on SiO2 substrates,
as inferred from its AEY spectra.Postprocess annealing introduces
crystallite grains of either cubic,
tetragonal, or rhombohedral phases in the thin-film BTO, increasing
its density.[17] This affects its dielectric
constant and leakage current.[7] The O K-edge
spectra of 3 h plasma treated and untreated as-deposited (AD) samples
are shown in Figure b. The intensity increase of peak A in all
the samples indicates a shift of the DOS towards lower energies. This
hints at the evolution of Ti–O–Ti bond symmetry[29] facilitated after BTO’s relaxation to
a thermodynamically more stable arrangement. The changes in the peak
intensity are most pronounced in the Ba-rich case, where, as per our
previous assumption, the lattice is most distorted compared to the
other compositions. The Ti K-edge of ALD samples (Figure S5) displays a perovskite typical pre-edge (feature
A),[39] larger and slightly shifted to lower
energy than cubic BTO. This indicates a displacement of Ti4+ cations from the center of the TiO6 octahedron. The feature
does not seem to change with plasma treatment, whereas the main edge
peaks (B and C) develop, pointing toward a change in Ti 4p hybridization.(a) Dielectric
constant (black squares, 1 KHz frequency, 0 V applied
bias) and corresponding leakage currents densities (red squares, +
1.6 V applied bias) of stoichiometric, Ba-rich, and Ti-rich BTO samples;
MIM capacitor (Pt/BTO/RuO2/Ru) with BTO thickness of 15
nm, plasma treated for 3 h. Note that leakage current densities under
positive bias means electrons are injected from the bottom Ru substrate
to BTO. Standard deviation is reported for 5 measurements in each
case. (b) The total DOS with increasing Ba content (bandgap region).The dielectric properties of thin-film
BTO strongly depend on the
Ba:Ti ratio and the morphology of the film.[8,12,17] Film thinness[40] and low crystallinity[32,41] limit the achievable
dielectric constants. The dielectric constants (Figure a) are similar to those obtained on 12 nm
thick ALDBTOMIS devices[7] and lower than
those on 32 nm thick thermally annealed MIM devices.[8] The lower dielectric constant compared to the latter results
from (1) the thinness and the (2) limited crystallinity of our samples.The leakage currents observed are lower than on ALDBTO-based MIS
devices,[7] which is likely due to the slightly
thicker films investigated in this work.[42] Interestingly, 32 nm thick thermally annealed MIM devices have higher
leakage current densities.[8] In polycrystalline
films, grain boundaries may act as preferred leakage paths leading
to higher leakage current densities than in amorphous films.[43] This can be shown gradually crystallizing the
film with postprocess O2 plasma.[17] Both dielectric constant and leakage current densities increase
with plasma duration (Figure S10). An optimization
of BTO MIM devices involves a trade-off between dielectric constant
and leakage current. A separate study is intended but beyond the scope
of this work.Regarding the trend in leakage current densities
with film composition,
we observe an inverse proportionality to the band gap, which determines
the barrier height for electrons flowing from the top electrode (Figure b).[7] Two opposing composition-dependent
mechanisms, (1) covalency and (2) ionicity, both related to the Ti–O
and Ba–O average bond distances (Ti–O and Ba–O, Table S4), may constitute the underlying mechanism.
In the Ba-rich case, the Ba–O bond length is longest, increasing
the material’s ionicity, which generally leads to a higher
band gap.[44] Ba–O bond lengths are
similar in the stoichiometric and Ti-rich case. The increase in band
gap at stoichiometry with respect to the Ti-rich case stems from the
larger Ti–O bond lengths, a product of decreased covalency.
In the Ti-rich case, a strong presence of Ti 3d states in the lower
part of the conduction band is observed, (Figure c (light green)) causing the highest leakage
current density in this sample.In summary, we have elaborated
on the local chemical and structural
modifications of thin-film BTO depending on ALD process parameters
like BaO:TiO2 cycle ratio and plasma duration as well as
the choice of the substrate. Analyzing the XANES O K-edge, we have
shown that the sequential deposition of TiO2 and BaO layers
results in the formation of an intermixed ternary MO that can be associated
with a distorted BTO. With increasing Ti content in the film, the
pDOS reveals the shift of O 2p–Ti 3d hybridized states to lower
energies. Furthermore, SiO2 as the substrate constrains
BTO growth, whereas the film is homogeneous throughout on RuO2, which is likely a result of interfacial layer formation.
Finally, postplasma annealing introduces Ti–O–Ti bond
symmetry through relaxation events, which is most pronounced in Ba-rich
films.Linking structural changes to ALD process parameters,
this work
provides new insight on BTO as a thin-film material and facilitates
the interpretation of the evolution of its electrical properties.
This knowledge will be key for optimizing future BTO devices and might
also lead to a better understanding of ALD ternary MO films in general.
Authors: Orlando Trejo; Katherine E Roelofs; Shicheng Xu; Manca Logar; Ritimukta Sarangi; Dennis Nordlund; Anup L Dadlani; Rob Kravec; Neil P Dasgupta; Stacey F Bent; Fritz B Prinz Journal: Nano Lett Date: 2015-11-13 Impact factor: 11.189
Authors: K J Choi; M Biegalski; Y L Li; A Sharan; J Schubert; R Uecker; P Reiche; Y B Chen; X Q Pan; V Gopalan; L-Q Chen; D G Schlom; C B Eom Journal: Science Date: 2004-11-05 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Ho Nyung Lee; Hans M Christen; Matthew F Chisholm; Christopher M Rouleau; Douglas H Lowndes Journal: Nature Date: 2005-01-27 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Peter E R Blanchard; Samuel Liu; Brendan J Kennedy; Chris D Ling; Zhaoming Zhang; Maxim Avdeev; Ling-Yun Jang; Jyh-Fu Lee; Chih-Wen Pao; Jeng-Lung Chen Journal: Dalton Trans Date: 2014-12-14 Impact factor: 4.390
Authors: Anup L Dadlani; Shinjita Acharya; Orlando Trejo; Fritz B Prinz; Jan Torgersen Journal: ACS Appl Mater Interfaces Date: 2016-05-31 Impact factor: 9.229