Literature DB >> 27006113

Amplified Striatal Responses to Near-Miss Outcomes in Pathological Gamblers.

Guillaume Sescousse1,2, Lieneke K Janssen1,2, Mahur M Hashemi1, Monique H M Timmer1,3, Dirk E M Geurts1,2, Niels P Ter Huurne1,4, Luke Clark5, Roshan Cools1,2.   

Abstract

Near-misses in gambling games are losing events that come close to a win. Near-misses were previously shown to recruit reward-related brain regions including the ventral striatum, and to invigorate gambling behavior, supposedly by fostering an illusion of control. Given that pathological gamblers are particularly vulnerable to such cognitive illusions, their persistent gambling behavior might result from an amplified striatal sensitivity to near-misses. In addition, animal studies have shown that behavioral responses to near-miss-like events are sensitive to dopamine, but this dopaminergic influence has not been tested in humans. To investigate these hypotheses, we recruited 22 pathological gamblers and 22 healthy controls who played a slot machine task delivering wins, near-misses and full-misses, inside an fMRI scanner. Each participant played the task twice, once under placebo and once under a dopamine D2 receptor antagonist (sulpiride 400 mg), in a double-blind, counter-balanced design. Participants were asked about their motivation to continue gambling throughout the task. Across all participants, near-misses elicited higher motivation to continue gambling and increased striatal responses compared with full-misses. Crucially, pathological gamblers showed amplified striatal responses to near-misses compared with controls. These group differences were not observed following win outcomes. In contrast to our hypothesis, sulpiride did not induce any reliable modulation of brain responses to near-misses. Together, our results demonstrate that pathological gamblers have amplified brain responses to near-misses, which likely contribute to their persistent gambling behavior. However, there is no evidence that these responses are influenced by dopamine. These results have implications for treatment and gambling regulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27006113      PMCID: PMC4987843          DOI: 10.1038/npp.2016.43

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology        ISSN: 0893-133X            Impact factor:   7.853


  65 in total

1.  Neurobehavioral evidence for the "Near-Miss" effect in pathological gamblers.

Authors:  Reza Habib; Mark R Dixon
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 2.  Decision-making during gambling: an integration of cognitive and psychobiological approaches.

Authors:  Luke Clark
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-01-27       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS): a new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers.

Authors:  H R Lesieur; S B Blume
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 18.112

4.  Can a near win kindle motivation? The impact of nearly winning on motivation for unrelated rewards.

Authors:  Monica Wadhwa; JeeHye Christine Kim
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2015-05-04

5.  A mechanistic account of striatal dopamine function in human cognition: psychopharmacological studies with cabergoline and haloperidol.

Authors:  Michael J Frank; Randall C O'Reilly
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.912

Review 6.  Prevalence of comorbid disorders in problem and pathological gambling: systematic review and meta-analysis of population surveys.

Authors:  Felicity K Lorains; Sean Cowlishaw; Shane A Thomas
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 6.526

7.  Risky decision-making and ventral striatal dopamine responses to amphetamine: a positron emission tomography [(11)C]raclopride study in healthy adults.

Authors:  Lynn M Oswald; Gary S Wand; Dean F Wong; Clayton H Brown; Hiroto Kuwabara; James R Brašić
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  The role of dopamine in the perceptual modulation of nociceptive stimuli by monetary wins or losses.

Authors:  Susanne Becker; Wiebke Gandhi; Nathaniel M Elfassy; Petra Schweinhardt
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 3.386

9.  "I was that close": Investigating Players' Reactions to Losses, Wins, and Near-Misses on Scratch Cards.

Authors:  Madison Stange; Candice Graydon; Mike J Dixon
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2016-03

10.  Agency modulates the lateral and medial prefrontal cortex responses in belief-based decision making.

Authors:  Gui Xue; Qinghua He; Zhong-Lin Lu; Irwin P Levin; Qi Dong; Antoine Bechara
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  13 in total

1.  Prior Exposure to Salient Win-Paired Cues in a Rat Gambling Task Increases Sensitivity to Cocaine Self-Administration and Suppresses Dopamine Efflux in Nucleus Accumbens: Support for the Reward Deficiency Hypothesis of Addiction.

Authors:  Jacqueline-Marie N Ferland; Tristan J Hynes; Celine D Hounjet; David Lindenbach; Cole Vonder Haar; Wendy K Adams; Anthony G Phillips; Catharine A Winstanley
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Brain oscillatory activity of skill and chance gamblers during a slot machine game.

Authors:  Helena Alicart; Ernest Mas-Herrero; Xavier Rifà-Ros; David Cucurell; Josep Marco-Pallarés
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 3.  Gambling disorder: an integrative review of animal and human studies.

Authors:  Katherine M Nautiyal; Mayumi Okuda; Rene Hen; Carlos Blanco
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 5.691

4.  Neural and neurocognitive markers of vulnerability to gambling disorder: a study of unaffected siblings.

Authors:  Eve H Limbrick-Oldfield; Inge Mick; Rachel E Cocks; Remy S A Flechais; Samuel Turton; Anne Lingford-Hughes; Henrietta Bowden-Jones; Luke Clark
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 7.853

5.  Development and Validation of a Near Miss Scale for Assessing Gambling Tendency.

Authors:  Mehmet Çakıcı; Nuriye Sancar; Ayşe Buran; Gökçe Çakır Şahan; Beniz Yılmaz
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2021-11-20

Review 6.  Neuroimaging of reward mechanisms in Gambling disorder: an integrative review.

Authors:  Luke Clark; Isabelle Boileau; Martin Zack
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 15.992

Review 7.  Using pharmacological manipulations to study the role of dopamine in human reward functioning: A review of studies in healthy adults.

Authors:  Heather E Webber; Paula Lopez-Gamundi; Sydney N Stamatovich; Harriet de Wit; Margaret C Wardle
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2020-11-14       Impact factor: 8.989

8.  Cognitive distortions and gambling near-misses in Internet Gaming Disorder: A preliminary study.

Authors:  Yin Wu; Guillaume Sescousse; Hongbo Yu; Luke Clark; Hong Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Dopaminergic Drug Effects on Probability Weighting during Risky Decision Making.

Authors:  Karita E Ojala; Lieneke K Janssen; Mahur M Hashemi; Monique H M Timmer; Dirk E M Geurts; Niels P Ter Huurne; Roshan Cools; Guillaume Sescousse
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2018-04-06

10.  Gambling with Rose-Tinted Glasses on: Use of Emotion-Regulation Strategies Correlates with Dysfunctional Cognitions in Gambling Disorder Patients.

Authors:  Juan F Navas; Antonio Verdejo-García; Marta LÓpez-GÓmez; Antonio Maldonado; José C Perales
Journal:  J Behav Addict       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 6.756

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.