Literature DB >> 25940671

Can a near win kindle motivation? The impact of nearly winning on motivation for unrelated rewards.

Monica Wadhwa1, JeeHye Christine Kim2.   

Abstract

Common intuition and research suggest that winning is more motivating than losing. However, we propose that just failing to obtain a reward (i.e., nearly winning it) in one task leads to broader, positive motivational effects on subsequent unrelated tasks relative to clearly losing or actually obtaining the reward. We manipulated a near-win experience using a game app in Experiments 1 through 3 and a lottery in Experiment 4. Our findings showed that nearly winning in one task subsequently led participants to walk faster to get to a chocolate bar (Experiment 1), salivate more for money (Experiment 2), and increase their effort to earn money in a card-sorting task (Experiment 3). A field study (Experiment 4) demonstrated that nearly winning led people to subsequently spend more money on desirable consumer products. Finally, our findings showed that when the activated motivational state was dampened in an intervening task, the nearly-winning effect was attenuated.
© The Author(s) 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  motivation; near wins; rewards

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25940671     DOI: 10.1177/0956797614568681

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  5 in total

1.  Mixed Emotions to Near-Miss Outcomes: A Psychophysiological Study with Facial Electromyography.

Authors:  Steve Sharman; Luke Clark
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2016-09

2.  Amplified Striatal Responses to Near-Miss Outcomes in Pathological Gamblers.

Authors:  Guillaume Sescousse; Lieneke K Janssen; Mahur M Hashemi; Monique H M Timmer; Dirk E M Geurts; Niels P Ter Huurne; Luke Clark; Roshan Cools
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 7.853

3.  On the Counterfactual Nature of Gambling Near-misses: An Experimental Study.

Authors:  Yin Wu; Eric van Dijk; Hong Li; Michael Aitken; Luke Clark
Journal:  J Behav Decis Mak       Date:  2017-04-03

4.  Comparison of clear and narrow outcomes on testosterone levels in social competition.

Authors:  Yin Wu; Christoph Eisenegger; Samuele Zilioli; Neil V Watson; Luke Clark
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 3.587

5.  The benefits of impossible tests: Assessing the role of error-correction in the pretesting effect.

Authors:  Tina Seabrooke; Chris J Mitchell; Andy J Wills; Angus B Inkster; Timothy J Hollins
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2021-08-06
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.