Literature DB >> 30993539

Brain oscillatory activity of skill and chance gamblers during a slot machine game.

Helena Alicart1, Ernest Mas-Herrero1,2, Xavier Rifà-Ros1,3, David Cucurell1,4, Josep Marco-Pallarés5,6.   

Abstract

Gambling behavior presents a broad variety of individual differences, with a continuum ranging from nongamblers to pathological gamblers. The reward network has been proposed to be critical in gambling behavior, but little is known about the behavioral and neural mechanisms underlying individual differences that depend on gambling preference. The main goals of the present study were to explore brain oscillatory responses to gambling outcomes in regular gamblers and to assess differences between strategic gamblers, nonstrategic gamblers, and nongamblers. In all, 54 healthy volunteers participated in the study. Electroencephalography was recorded while participants were playing a slot machine task that delivered win, near-miss, and full-miss outcomes. Behaviorally, regular gamblers selected a larger percentage of risky bets, especially when they could select the image to play. The time-frequency results showed larger oscillatory theta power increases to near-misses and increased beta power to win outcomes for regular gamblers, as compared to nongamblers. Moreover, theta oscillatory activity after wins was only increased in nonstrategic gamblers, revealing differences between the two groups of gamblers. The present results reveal differences between regular gamblers and nongamblers in both their behavioral and neural responses to gambling outcomes. Moreover, the results suggest that different brain oscillatory mechanisms might underlie the studied gambling profiles, which might have implications for both basic and clinical studies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Beta; Gambling; Near-miss; Oscillations; Reward; Theta

Year:  2019        PMID: 30993539     DOI: 10.3758/s13415-019-00715-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 1530-7026            Impact factor:   3.282


  44 in total

1.  Effects of the "near miss" and the "big win" on persistence at slot machine gambling.

Authors:  J I Kassinove; M L Schare
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2001-06

2.  Neurobehavioral evidence for the "Near-Miss" effect in pathological gamblers.

Authors:  Reza Habib; Mark R Dixon
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  The role of perceived control and overconfidence in pathological gambling.

Authors:  Adam S Goodie
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2005

4.  Temporal dynamics of reward processing revealed by magnetoencephalography.

Authors:  Nuria Doñamayor; Josep Marco-Pallarés; Marcus Heldmann; M Ariel Schoenfeld; Thomas F Münte
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Subjective illusion of control modulates striatal reward anticipation in adolescence.

Authors:  Robert C Lorenz; Tobias Gleich; Simone Kühn; Lydia Pöhland; Patricia Pelz; Torsten Wüstenberg; Diana Raufelder; Andreas Heinz; Anne Beck
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-05-16       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Problem gamblers exhibit reward hypersensitivity in medial frontal cortex during gambling.

Authors:  Scott A K Oberg; Gregory J Christie; Matthew S Tata
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS): a new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers.

Authors:  H R Lesieur; S B Blume
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 18.112

8.  Gender-related differences in the characteristics of problem gamblers using a gambling helpline.

Authors:  M N Potenza; M A Steinberg; S D McLaughlin; R Wu; B J Rounsaville; S S O'Malley
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 18.112

9.  Gambling near-misses enhance motivation to gamble and recruit win-related brain circuitry.

Authors:  Luke Clark; Andrew J Lawrence; Frances Astley-Jones; Nicola Gray
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Medial frontal cortex and response conflict: evidence from human intracranial EEG and medial frontal cortex lesion.

Authors:  Michael X Cohen; K Richard Ridderinkhof; Sven Haupt; Christian E Elger; Juergen Fell
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-08-07       Impact factor: 3.252

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.