Literature DB >> 27000928

A comparison of surgeon's postural muscle activity during robotic-assisted and laparoscopic rectal surgery.

Grace P Y Szeto1, Jensen T C Poon2, Wai-Lun Law2.   

Abstract

This study compared the muscular activity in the surgeon's neck and upper limbs during robotic-assisted laparoscopic (R-Lap) surgery and conventional laparoscopic (C-Lap) surgery. Two surgeons performed the same procedure of R-Lap and C-Lap low anterior resection, and real-time surface electromyography was recorded in bilateral cervical erector spinae, upper trapezius (UT) and anterior deltoid muscles for over 60 min in each procedure. In one surgeon, forearm muscle activities were also recorded during robotic surgery. Similar levels of cervical muscle activity were demonstrated in both types of surgery. One surgeon showed much higher activity in the left UT muscle during robotic surgery. In the second surgeon, C-Lap was associated with much higher levels of muscle activity in both UT muscles. This may be related to the bilateral abducted arm posture required in maneuvering the laparoscopic instruments. In the forearm region, the "ulnaris" muscles for wrist flexion and extension bilaterally showed high amplitudes during robotic-assisted surgery. Robotic-assisted surgery seemed to demand a higher level of muscle work in the forearm region while greater efforts of shoulder muscles were involved during laparoscopic surgery. There are also individual variations in postural habits and motor control that can affect the muscle activation patterns. This study demonstrated a method of objectively examining the surgeon's physical workload during real-time surgery in the operating theatre, and further research should explore the surgeon's workload in a larger group of surgeons performing different surgical procedures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electromyography; Ergonomics; Laparoscopic; Low anterior resection; Robotic; Surgeons

Year:  2012        PMID: 27000928     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-012-0374-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  10 in total

Review 1.  Robotics and ergonomics.

Authors:  Nicholas Stylopoulos; David Rattner
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.741

Review 2.  History of robotic surgery: from AESOP® and ZEUS® to da Vinci®.

Authors:  F Pugin; P Bucher; P Morel
Journal:  J Visc Surg       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 2.043

3.  An ergonomic comparison of robotic and laparoscopic technique: the influence of surgeon experience and task complexity.

Authors:  Ramon Berguer; Warren Smith
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2005-12-27       Impact factor: 2.192

4.  Advantages of advanced laparoscopic systems.

Authors:  J Heemskerk; R Zandbergen; J G Maessen; J W M Greve; N D Bouvy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-03-09       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  A consensus document on robotic surgery.

Authors:  D M Herron; M Marohn
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-12-28       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Work-related musculoskeletal symptoms in surgeons.

Authors:  Grace P Y Szeto; Pei Ho; Albert C W Ting; Jensen T C Poon; Stephen W K Cheng; Raymond C C Tsang
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2009-04-21

7.  A study of surgeons' postural muscle activity during open, laparoscopic, and endovascular surgery.

Authors:  G P Y Szeto; P Ho; A C W Ting; J T C Poon; R C C Tsang; S W K Cheng
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-12-25       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Robotic assistance improves intracorporeal suturing performance and safety in the operating room while decreasing operator workload.

Authors:  Dimitrios Stefanidis; Fikre Wang; James R Korndorffer; J Bruce Dunne; Daniel J Scott
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Learning curves in expert and non-expert laparoscopic surgeons for robotic suturing with the da Vinci(®) Surgical System.

Authors:  Yasuo Sumi; Parag W Dhumane; Koji Komeda; Bernard Dallemagne; Daisuke Kuroda; Jacques Marescaux
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2012-02-11

10.  Ergonomics, user comfort, and performance in standard and robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  R H van der Schatte Olivier; C D P Van't Hullenaar; J P Ruurda; I A M J Broeders
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 4.584

  10 in total
  5 in total

Review 1.  Musculoskeletal pain among surgeons performing minimally invasive surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Tina Dalager; Karen Søgaard; Katrine Tholstrup Bech; Ole Mogensen; Pernille Tine Jensen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Robotic surgery trends in general surgical oncology from the National Inpatient Sample.

Authors:  Camille L Stewart; Philip H G Ituarte; Kurt A Melstrom; Susanne G Warner; Laleh G Melstrom; Lily L Lai; Yuman Fong; Yanghee Woo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Muscle activation during traditional laparoscopic surgery compared with robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jaime Hislop; Oren Tirosh; John McCormick; Romesh Nagarajah; Chris Hensman; Mats Isaksson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Robotic colorectal surgery and ergonomics.

Authors:  Shing Wai Wong; Zhen Hao Ang; Phillip F Yang; Philip Crowe
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2021-04-22

5.  Who is hurting? A prospective study of surgeon ergonomics.

Authors:  Camille Stewart; Mustafa Raoof; Yuman Fong; Thanh Dellinger; Susanne Warner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 4.584

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.