Literature DB >> 33523280

Who is hurting? A prospective study of surgeon ergonomics.

Camille Stewart1,2, Mustafa Raoof3, Yuman Fong3, Thanh Dellinger3, Susanne Warner3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of prospective data related to surgeon ergonomics, which affects career longevity. Robotic surgical systems may mitigate pain and workload. We hypothesized that ergonomic outcomes would vary based on surgeon height and gender, and the relative benefit of robotic surgery would vary based on these demographics.
METHODS: Surgeons received questionnaires to fill out immediately before and after surgery to enable calculation of pain scores and task load. Surgeons who were ≤ 66 inches tall were considered "short". Univariable and multivariable regression analyses were performed where appropriate using Stata-MP version 14.2 (StataCorp LLC, College Station, TX).
RESULTS: There were 124 questionnaires given to 20 surgeons; 97 (78%) were returned, and 12 (12%) laparoscopic operations were excluded, leaving 85 (69%) questionnaires for further analysis: 33 (38%) from short surgeons, and 24 (28%) from women, for 30 (35%) robotic and 55 (65%) open operations. There were 44/85 (52%) surgeons who reported worse pain after surgery. Overall pain scores (1.1 ± 2.6 vs 1.5 ± 2.6, p = 0.70) were similar for robotic and open operations. In multivariable analysis, greater surgeon pain scores were significantly associated with short surgeons (p < 0.001), male surgeons (p < 0.001), and long operative times (p = 0.03). Physical demand was lower for robot vs open operations (median 10 vs 13, p = 0.03). When short surgeons (p = 0.04) and male surgeons (p = 0.03) were examined as sub-groups, lower physical demand during robotic operations persisted, but was lost when only examining tall surgeons (p = 0.07) and female surgeons (p = 0.13).
CONCLUSIONS: Short surgeons and male surgeons reported significantly more pain after both open and robotic operations but had less physical demand when using the robotic system. Future work should focus on mitigation of surgeon height-related factors and seek to understand ergonomic gender differences beyond height.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ergonomics; Laparoscopic surgery; Robotic surgery; Task load index

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33523280     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-08274-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  9 in total

1.  Comparison of postural ergonomics between laparoscopic and robotic sacrocolpopexy: a pilot study.

Authors:  Megan E Tarr; Sam J Brancato; Jacqueline A Cunkelman; Anthony Polcari; Benjamin Nutter; Kimberly Kenton
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2014-10-12       Impact factor: 4.137

2.  A comparison of surgeon's postural muscle activity during robotic-assisted and laparoscopic rectal surgery.

Authors:  Grace P Y Szeto; Jensen T C Poon; Wai-Lun Law
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2012-08-09

3.  The aching surgeon: a survey of physical discomfort and symptoms following open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgery.

Authors:  Timothy A Plerhoples; Tina Hernandez-Boussard; Sherry M Wren
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-12-13

4.  NASA-Task Load Index Differentiates Surgical Approach: Opportunities for Improvement in Colon and Rectal Surgery.

Authors:  Katherine E Law; Bethany R Lowndes; Scott R Kelley; Renaldo C Blocker; David W Larson; M Susan Hallbeck; Heidi Nelson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Robotic surgery trends in general surgical oncology from the National Inpatient Sample.

Authors:  Camille L Stewart; Philip H G Ituarte; Kurt A Melstrom; Susanne G Warner; Laleh G Melstrom; Lily L Lai; Yuman Fong; Yanghee Woo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Musculoskeletal occupational injury among surgeons: effects for patients, providers, and institutions.

Authors:  William T Davis; Sarah A Fletcher; Oscar D Guillamondegui
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 2.192

7.  Effect of Robotic-Assisted vs Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery on Risk of Conversion to Open Laparotomy Among Patients Undergoing Resection for Rectal Cancer: The ROLARR Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  David Jayne; Alessio Pigazzi; Helen Marshall; Julie Croft; Neil Corrigan; Joanne Copeland; Phil Quirke; Nick West; Tero Rautio; Niels Thomassen; Henry Tilney; Mark Gudgeon; Paolo Pietro Bianchi; Richard Edlin; Claire Hulme; Julia Brown
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Ergonomic risk factors and musculoskeletal symptoms in surgeons with three types of surgery: Open, laparoscopic, and microsurgery.

Authors:  Mashallah Aghilinejad; Ali Asghar Ehsani; Atefeh Talebi; Jalil Koohpayehzadeh; Naser Dehghan
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2016-12-28

9.  Perceptions of Factors Associated With Inclusive Work and Learning Environments in Health Care Organizations: A Qualitative Narrative Analysis.

Authors:  Jaya Aysola; Frances K Barg; Ana Bonilla Martinez; Matthew Kearney; Kareha Agesa; Carlos Carmona; Eve Higginbotham
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2018-08-03
  9 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  A Woman's Place Is in Theatre, but Are Theatres Designed with Women in Mind? A Systematic Review of Ergonomics for Women in Surgery.

Authors:  Maria Irene Bellini; Maria Ida Amabile; Paolina Saullo; Noemi Zorzetti; Mario Testini; Roberto Caronna; Vito D'Andrea
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-18       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 2.  Should All Minimal Access Surgery Be Robot-Assisted? A Systematic Review into the Musculoskeletal and Cognitive Demands of Laparoscopic and Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery.

Authors:  Abdul Shugaba; Joel E Lambert; Theodoros M Bampouras; Helen E Nuttall; Christopher J Gaffney; Daren A Subar
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 3.267

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.