Literature DB >> 20035345

A study of surgeons' postural muscle activity during open, laparoscopic, and endovascular surgery.

G P Y Szeto1, P Ho, A C W Ting, J T C Poon, R C C Tsang, S W K Cheng.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Different surgical procedures impose different physical demands on surgeons and high prevalence rates of neck and shoulder pain have been reported among general surgeons. Past research has examined electromyography in surgeons mainly during simulated conditions of laparoscopic and open surgery but not during real-time operations and not for long durations. The present study compares the neck-shoulder muscle activities in three types of surgery and between different surgeons. The relationships of postural muscle activities to musculoskeletal symptoms and personal factors also are examined.
METHODS: Twenty-five surgeons participated in the study (23 men). Surface electromyography (EMG) was recorded in the bilateral cervical erector spinae, upper trapezius, and anterior deltoid muscles during three types of surgical procedures: open, laparoscopic, and endovascular. In each procedure, EMG data were captured for 30 min to more than 1 h. The surgeons were asked to rate any musculoskeletal symptoms before and after surgery.
RESULTS: The present study showed significantly higher muscle activities in the cervical erector spinae and upper trapezius muscles in open surgery compared with endovascular and laparoscopic procedures. Muscle activities were fairly similar between endovascular and laparoscopic surgery. The upper trapezius usually has an important role in stabilizing both the neck and upper limb posture, and this muscle also recorded higher activities in open compared with laparoscopic and endovascular surgeries. Surgeons reported similar degrees of musculoskeletal symptoms in open and laparoscopic surgeries, which were higher than endovascular surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: The present study showed that open surgery imposed significantly greater physical demands on the neck muscles compared with endovascular and laparoscopic surgeries. This may be due to the lighter manual task demands of these minimally invasive surgeries compared with open procedures, which generally required more dynamic movements and more forceful exertions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20035345     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-009-0834-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  28 in total

1.  Ergonomic problems associated with laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  R Berguer; D L Forkey; W D Smith
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  An ergonomic study of the optimum operating table height for laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  R Berquer; W D Smith; S Davis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-11-16       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  The effect of using laparoscopic instruments on muscle activation patterns during minimally invasive surgical training procedures.

Authors:  N E Quick; J C Gillette; R Shapiro; G L Adrales; D Gerlach; A E Park
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-10-29       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Ergonomic aspects of five different types of laparoscopic instrument handles under dynamic conditions with respect to specific laparoscopic tasks: an electromyographic-based study.

Authors:  U Matern; G Kuttler; C Giebmeyer; P Waller; M Faist
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-06-23       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Monitor position in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  U Matern; M Faist; K Kehl; C Giebmeyer; G Buess
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-01-10       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  A newly designed ergonomic body support for surgeons.

Authors:  A Albayrak; M A van Veelen; J F Prins; C J Snijders; H de Ridder; G Kazemier
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-03-14       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Changes in the degree of motor variability associated with experimental and chronic neck-shoulder pain during a standardised repetitive arm movement.

Authors:  Pascal Madeleine; Svend Erik Mathiassen; Lars Arendt-Nielsen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  An ergonomic comparison of in-line vs pistol-grip handle configuration in a laparoscopic grasper.

Authors:  R Berguer; S Gerber; G Kilpatrick; D Beckley
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Measurement and evaluation of local muscular strain in the shoulder during constrained work.

Authors:  B Jonsson
Journal:  J Hum Ergol (Tokyo)       Date:  1982-09

Review 10.  Optimal ergonomics for laparoscopic surgery in minimally invasive surgery suites: a review and guidelines.

Authors:  M J van Det; W J H J Meijerink; C Hoff; E R Totté; J P E N Pierie
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  10 in total

1.  Microcomplications in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: impact on duration of surgery and costs.

Authors:  Marco von Strauss Und Torney; Salome Dell-Kuster; Henry Hoffmann; Urs von Holzen; Daniel Oertli; Rachel Rosenthal
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic single-incision cholecystectomy: results of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Lukasz Filip Grochola; Christopher Soll; Adrian Zehnder; Roland Wyss; Pascal Herzog; Stefan Breitenstein
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  A comparison of surgeon's postural muscle activity during robotic-assisted and laparoscopic rectal surgery.

Authors:  Grace P Y Szeto; Jensen T C Poon; Wai-Lun Law
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2012-08-09

Review 4.  Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Health of the Surgeon.

Authors:  Andrew T Schlussel; Justin A Maykel
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2019-08-22

5.  The impact of preventable disruption on the operative time for minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  Latif Al-Hakim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Surgeons' physical workload in open surgery versus robot-assisted surgery and nonsurgical tasks.

Authors:  Xuelong Fan; Mikael Forsman; Liyun Yang; Carl M Lind; Magnus Kjellman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  The second "time-out": a surgical safety checklist for lengthy robotic surgeries.

Authors:  Joseph B Song; Goutham Vemana; Jonathan M Mobley; Sam B Bhayani
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2013-06-03

8.  Prevalence and Risk Factors Associated with Musculoskeletal Discomfort in Spay and Neuter Veterinarians.

Authors:  Sara C White
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 2.752

9.  Robot-assisted single-site compared with laparoscopic single-incision cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder disease: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Lukasz Filip Grochola; Christopher Soll; Adrian Zehnder; Roland Wyss; Pascal Herzog; Stefan Breitenstein
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 10.  Surgeon symptoms, strain, and selections: Systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical ergonomics.

Authors:  Chee-Chee H Stucky; Kate D Cromwell; Rachel K Voss; Yi-Ju Chiang; Karin Woodman; Jeffrey E Lee; Janice N Cormier
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2018-01-09
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.