| Literature DB >> 29854760 |
Xiujun Gao1, Xiqi Li1, Peisheng Yan1, Rui Sun1, Guangfeng Kan1, Ying Zhou1.
Abstract
ACE inhibitory dipeptides from Xerocomus badius fermented shrimp processing waste were isolated with ethanol, macroporous resin, chloroform, and Sephadex G-10 in sequence and identified by LC-MS/MS system coupled with electrospray ionization source. Molecular docking was performed for exploring the mechanism of their inhibitions. The results showed that the identified ACE inhibitory dipeptides were Cys-Cys and Cys-Arg with IC50 values of 4.37 ± 0.07 and 475.95 ± 0.11 μM, respectively. The difference between ACE inhibitor potency of Cys-Cys and Cys-Arg could be explained by results of molecular docking. Cys-Cys formed crucial coordination between carboxyl oxygen and Zn(II), hydrogen bonds with residues Ala354(O), Ala356(HN), and Tyr523(OH), and a bump with the residue His387(NE2) at the active site of ACE. There was no coordination, except for 5 hydrogen bonds (at residues His353, Ala354, Glu384, Glu403, and Arg522) and a bump (Glu411) between Cys-Arg and active site of ACE. These findings highlighted that Cys-Cys could be considered as a novel potent ACE inhibitor, and coordination between its carboxyl oxygen and Zn(II) played significant role in defining its ACE inhibitor potency.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29854760 PMCID: PMC5964570 DOI: 10.1155/2018/5089270
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Purification of ACE inhibitory peptide of mycelium from X. badius fermented shrimp processing waste.
| Purification step | Fraction | IC50 value ( | Purification fold |
|---|---|---|---|
| — | WEMXS | 213.52 ± 15.44 | 1 |
| Alcohol precipitation | WEMXS-I | 162.41 ± 11.81 | 1.31 |
| Macroporous resin (D3520) | MRD-1 | 132.77 ± 14.40 | 1.61 |
| Chloroform extraction | C1 | 146.27 ± 16.28 | 1.46 |
| C2 | 114.94 ± 0.49 | 1.86 | |
| Sephadex G-10 gel | F2 | 135.17 ± 0.96 | 1.58 |
Figure 1Purification profiles of ACE inhibitory peptide from C2 with Sephadex G-10 gel chromatography of fraction.
Figure 2Molecular mass and amino acid sequence of potential ACE inhibitory peptide from the purified fraction F2. (a) IT-MS spectrum of purified F2 fraction. (b) IT-MS/MS spectrum of F2-1; (c) IT-MS/MS spectrum of F2-2.
Figure 3The second stage mass spectrum of Cys-Phe and Thr-Pro-Ser-Pro-Arg. (a) Cys-Phe [19]. (b) Thr-Pro-Ser-Pro-Arg [36].
Purified dipeptides and their ACE inhibitory activity.
| Dipeptide | Molecular weight | Purity | IC50 value ( |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cys-Cys | 224.30 | 98.878 | 4.37 ± 0.07 |
| Cys-Arg | 277.35 | 98.8963 | 475.95 ± 0.11 |
| Cys-Phe | 268.34 | 99.0715 | 13.82 ± 0.09 |
Note. ∗∗∗ indicates the difference at P < 0.001 level from other dipeptides.
Figure 4Thermo and gastrointestinal digestion stability of Cys-Cys and Cys-Arg. (a) Incubation at various temperatures. (b) In vitro gastrointestinal digestion.
Figure 5The best ranked docking pose of Cys-Cys and Cys-Arg with ACE (PDB: 1O8A). (A) Local overview of docking pose of Cys-Cys at the ACE active site. (a) The binding mode between ACE residues and Cys-Cys at the ACE active site (green dotted line indicates hydrogen bond formation, purple dotted line indicates bump formation, and green solid line indicates coordination). (B) Local overview of docking pose of Cys-Arg at the ACE active site. (b) The binding mode between ACE residues and Cys-Arg at the ACE active site (green dotted line indicates hydrogen bond formation and purple dotted line indicates bump formation).
Interaction between dipeptides and residues of ACE.
| Cys-Cys | Cys-Arg | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Residue name | Distance (Å) | Residue name | Distance (Å) |
| Ala354(O)-H21A | 2.337 | His353(NE2)-H19A | 2.367 |
| Ala356(HN)-O12A | 2.364 | Ala354(O)-H20A | 2.314 |
| Tyr523(OH)-H16A | 1.759 | Glu384(OE2)-H20A | 2.441 |
| His387(NE2)-O13B | 1.916 | Glu403(OE1)-H34A | 2.219 |
| Zn-O13C | 2.088 | Arg522(HH11)-O18A | 2.430 |
| Glu411(OE2)-O17B | 1.548 | ||
Note. A refers to Hbonds, B to bump, and C to bonds.