| Literature DB >> 30171356 |
Jiafu Huang1, Yixin Ou1, Danfeng Zhang1, Guoguang Zhang1, Yutian Pan2.
Abstract
In the present study, conditions for Bacillus mucilaginous fermentation using Agaricus bisporus wastewater as culture medium were optimized. We analyzed the total number of living B. mucilaginous in the fermentation broth using multispectral imaging flow cytometry. Single-factor experiments were carried out, where a Plackett-Burman design was used to screen out three factors from the original six factors of processing wastewater solubility, initial pH, inoculum size, liquid volume, culture temperature, and rotation speed that affected the total number of viable B. mucilaginous. The Box-Behnken response surface method was used to optimize interactions between the three main factors and predict optimal fermentation conditions. Factors significantly affecting the total number of viable B. mucilaginous, including shaking speed, culturing temperature, and initial pH, were investigated. The optimum conditions for B. mucilaginous fermentation in A. bisporus wastewater were a rotational speed of 195 rpm, culture temperature of 29 °C, initial pH of 6.5, solubility of 0.5%, 8% inoculation volume, and 90 mL liquid volume in a 250 mL flask, culture time of 48 h. Under these conditions, the concentration of total viable bacteria reached 2.16 ± 0.02 × 108 Obj/mL, which meets the national standard. A. bisporus wastewater can be used for the cultivation of B. mucilaginous.Entities:
Keywords: Agaricus bisporus wastewater; Bacillus mucilaginous; Box–Behnken response surface; Multispectral imaging flow cytometry; Plackett–Burman
Year: 2018 PMID: 30171356 PMCID: PMC6119174 DOI: 10.1186/s13568-018-0671-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AMB Express ISSN: 2191-0855 Impact factor: 3.298
Factors and levels assessed in single-factor tests
| Level | Factor | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Concentration (%) | pH | Loaded liquid (mL/250 mL) | Inoculum ( | Culture temperature (°C) | Shaking speed (rpm) | |
| 1 | 0.0625 | 5.0 | 15 | 0.5 | 20 | 50 |
| 2 | 0.125 | 5.5 | 30 | 1 | 24 | 100 |
| 3 | 0.25 | 6.0 | 60 | 2 | 28 | 150 |
| 4 | 0.5 | 6.5 | 90 | 4 | 32 | 200 |
| 5 | 1 | 7.0 | 120 | 8 | 36 | 250 |
| 6 | 2 | 7.5 | 150 | 16 | – | – |
| 7 | 8.0 | – | – | – | – | |
Plackett–Burman experimental design
| Code run | A [concentration (%)] | B (pH) | C [inoculum (%)] | D [loaded liquid (mL/250 mL)] | E (culture temperature (°C)) | F [shaking speed (rpm)] | Total viable |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | − 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | − 1 | 1.15 ± 0.02 |
| 2 | 1 | − 1 | − 1 | − 1 | 1 | − 1 | 0 |
| 3 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | − 1 | − 1 | 5.30 ± 0.01 |
| 4 | −1 | 1 | 1 | − 1 | 1 | 1 | 1.78 ± 0.01 |
| 5 | −1 | − 1 | 1 | − 1 | 1 | 1 | 3.75 ± 0.02 |
| 6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | − 1 | − 1 | − 1 | 2.90 ± 0.01 |
| 7 | −1 | 1 | − 1 | 1 | 1 | − 1 | 2.20 ± 0.01 |
| 8 | −1 | − 1 | − 1 | 1 | − 1 | 1 | 5.05 ± 0.03 |
| 9 | 1 | 1 | − 1 | − 1 | − 1 | 1 | 5.10 ± 0.02 |
| 10 | −1 | − 1 | − 1 | − 1 | − 1 | − 1 | 1.25 ± 0.02 |
| 11 | 1 | 1 | − 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3.50 ± 0.03 |
| 12 | 1 | − 1 | 1 | 1 | − 1 | 1 | 4.17 ± 0.02 |
Fig. 1B. mucilaginous growth curve
Fig. 2Live and dead B. mucilaginous based on multispectral imaging flow. a From the collected images, live and dead B. mucilaginous and dust were visually identified (as indicated by colored crosses) and the tagged populations were gated on the original plot. b Images of dead B. mucilaginous in the fermented liquid. c Images of live B. mucilaginous in the fermented liquid. Images from within each region were chosen at random. From left to right, bright-field, SYTO 9, and propidium iodide channel images are displayed
Fig. 3Results of the single-factor test. Effect of (a) initial pH, (b) concentration, (c) inoculum, (d) initial volume of loaded liquid, (e) culture temperature, and (f) shaking speed on total number of live B. mucilaginous
Analysis of variance in Plackett–Burman
| Source | Sum of squares |
| Mean squares | F value | Coefficient estimate | Importance | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 3.737E | 6 | 62,280.99 | 17.60 | 0.0032 | ||
| A | 623.52 | 1 | 623.52 | 0.18 | 0.6921 | 7.21 | 6 |
| B | 64,167.19 | 1 | 64,167.19 | 18.13 | 0.0080 | 73.13 | 3 |
| C | 1692.19 | 1 | 1692.19 | 0.48 | 0.5201 | − 11.88 | 5 |
| D | 82,751.02 | 1 | 82,751.02 | 23.38 | 0.0047 | 83.04 | 2 |
| E | 1.817E+005 | 1 | 1.817E+005 | 51.33 | 0.0008 | − 123.04 | 1 |
| F | 42,781.02 | 1 | 42,781.02 | 12.09 | 0.0177 | 59.71 | 4 |
| Residual | 17,695.27 | 5 | 3539.05 | ||||
| Cor total | 3.914E+005 | 11 |
Experimental design of steepest ascent and corresponding results
| Run | Shaking speed (rmp) | Culture temperature (°C) | pH | Total viable |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 250 | 24 | 6.0 | 1.06 ± 0.01 |
| 2 | 200 | 28 | 6.5 | 2.17 ± 0.02 |
| 3 | 150 | 32 | 7.0 | 1.92 ± 0.03 |
| 4 | 100 | 36 | 7.5 | 1.05 ± 0.01 |
| 5 | 50 | 40 | 8.0 | 0.62 ± 0.02 |
Box–Behnken design
| Run | Total viable | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 150 | 28 | 7.0 | 0.44 ± 0.01 |
| 2 | 200 | 28 | 6.5 | 1.15 ± 0.02 |
| 3 | 200 | 28 | 6.5 | 1.16 ± 0.03 |
| 4 | 200 | 32 | 6.0 | 0.77 ± 0.02 |
| 5 | 250 | 32 | 6.5 | 0.27 ± 0.01 |
| 6 | 250 | 28 | 6.0 | 0.21 ± 0.01 |
| 7 | 200 | 24 | 6.0 | 0.09 ± 0.00 |
| 8 | 150 | 32 | 6.5 | 0.68 ± 0.01 |
| 9 | 200 | 32 | 7.0 | 0.58 ± 0.01 |
| 10 | 200 | 28 | 6.5 | 1.18 ± 0.02 |
| 11 | 150 | 28 | 6.0 | 0.11 ± 0.01 |
| 12 | 250 | 28 | 7.0 | 0.03 ± 0.00 |
| 13 | 250 | 24 | 6.5 | 0.11 ± 0.00 |
| 14 | 200 | 24 | 7.0 | 0.35 ± 0.01 |
| 15 | 200 | 28 | 6.5 | 1.20 ± 0.02 |
| 16 | 200 | 28 | 6.5 | 1.10 ± 0.02 |
| 17 | 150 | 24 | 6.5 | 0.09 ± 0.00 |
Analysis regression and variance results
| Source | Sum of squares |
| Mean squares | F value | p-value prob > F | Significance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 32,355.03 | 9 | 3595.00 | 249.81 | < 0.0001 | ** |
|
| 621.28 | 1 | 621.28 | 43.17 | 0.0003 | ** |
|
| 3465.28 | 1 | 3465.28 | 240.79 | < 0.0001 | ** |
|
| 60.50 | 1 | 60.50 | 4.20 | 0.0795 | |
|
| 484.00 | 1 | 484.00 | 33.63 | 0.0007 | ** |
|
| 663.06 | 1 | 663.06 | 46.07 | 0.0003 | ** |
|
| 517.56 | 1 | 517.56 | 35.96 | 0.0005 | ** |
|
| 13,275.04 | 1 | 13,275.04 | 922.45 | < 0.0001 | ** |
|
| 4020.25 | 1 | 4020.25 | 279.36 | < 0.0001 | ** |
|
| 6661.27 | 1 | 6661.27 | 462.87 | < 0.0001 | ** |
| Residual | 100.74 | 7 | 14.39 | |||
| Lack of fit | 43.94 | 3 | 14.65 | 1.03 | 0.4683 | |
| Pure error | 56.80 | 4 | 14.20 | |||
| Cor total | 32,455.76 | 16 | ||||
| R2 = 0.9969, | ||||||
* Significant, ** very significant
Fig. 4The effect of cross-interaction among shaking speed, culture temperature and pH on total number of alive B. mucilaginous. a Response surface plot of effects of interaction between shaking speed and culture temperature on total number of alive B. mucilaginous; b contour line of effects of interaction between shaking speed and culture temperature on total number of alive B. mucilaginous; c response surface plot of effects of interaction between shaking speed and pH on total number of alive B. mucilaginous; d contour line of effects of interaction between shaking speed and pH on total number of alive B. mucilaginous; e response surface plot of effects of interaction between culture temperature and pH on total number of alive B. mucilaginous; f contour line of effects of interaction between culture temperature and pH on total number of alive B. mucilaginous