Literature DB >> 26997941

Multiple Small Supernumerary Marker Chromosomes Resulting from Maternal Meiosis I or II Errors.

Ron Hochstenbach1, Beata Nowakowska2, Marianne Volleth3, Amber Ummels1, Anna Kutkowska-Kaźmierczak2, Ewa Obersztyn2, Kamila Ziemkiewicz2, Claudia Gerloff4, Denny Schanze3, Martin Zenker3, Petra Muschke3, Ina Schanze3, Martin Poot1, Thomas Liehr5.   

Abstract

We present 2 cases with multiple de novo supernumerary marker chromosomes (sSMCs), each derived from a different chromosome. In a prenatal case, we found mosaicism for an sSMC(4), sSMC(6), sSMC(9), sSMC(14) and sSMC(22), while a postnatal case had an sSMC(4), sSMC(8) and an sSMC(11). SNP-marker segregation indicated that the sSMC(4) resulted from a maternal meiosis II error in the prenatal case. Segregation of short tandem repeat markers on the sSMC(8) was consistent with a maternal meiosis I error in the postnatal case. In the latter, a boy with developmental/psychomotor delay, autism, hyperactivity, speech delay, and hypotonia, the sSMC(8) was present at the highest frequency in blood. By comparison to other patients with a corresponding duplication, a minimal region of overlap for the phenotype was identified, with CHRNB3 and CHRNA6 as dosage-sensitive candidate genes. These genes encode subunits of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs). We propose that overproduction of these subunits leads to perturbed component stoichiometries with dominant negative effects on the function of nAChRs, as was shown by others in vitro. With the limitation that in each case only one sSMC could be studied, our findings demonstrate that different meiotic errors lead to multiple sSMCs. We relate our findings to age-related aneuploidy in female meiosis and propose that predivision sister-chromatid separation during meiosis I or II, or both, may generate multiple sSMCs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CHRNA6; CHRNB3; Dominant negative effect; Maternal meiotic segregation error; Mental retardation; Multiple supernumerary marker chromosomes; Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors; Predivision chromatid separation

Year:  2015        PMID: 26997941      PMCID: PMC4772618          DOI: 10.1159/000441408

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Syndromol        ISSN: 1661-8769


  65 in total

1.  Twenty-four chromosome FISH in human IVF embryos reveals patterns of post-zygotic chromosome segregation and nuclear organisation.

Authors:  D Ioannou; K G L Fonseka; E J Meershoek; A R Thornhill; A Abogrein; M Ellis; D K Griffin
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 5.239

2.  Multiple meiotic errors caused by predivision of chromatids in women of advanced maternal age undergoing in vitro fertilisation.

Authors:  Alan H Handyside; Markus Montag; M Cristina Magli; Sjoerd Repping; Joyce Harper; Andreas Schmutzler; Katerina Vesela; Luca Gianaroli; Joep Geraedts
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Polar body analysis by array comparative genomic hybridization accurately predicts aneuploidies of maternal meiotic origin in cleavage stage embryos of women of advanced maternal age.

Authors:  Dimitra Christopikou; Erika Tsorva; Konstantinos Economou; Piran Shelley; Stephen Davies; Minas Mastrominas; Alan H Handyside
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2013-03-10       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Mitotic stability of small supernumerary marker chromosomes depends on their shape and telomeres - a long term in vitro study.

Authors:  Shaymaa Subhi Hussein; Katharina Kreskowski; Monika Ziegler; Elisabeth Klein; Ahmed B Hamid; Nadezda Kosyakova; Marianne Volleth; Thomas Liehr; Xiaobo Fan; Katja Piaszinski
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2014-09-20       Impact factor: 3.688

Review 5.  Phenotypic variability and genetic susceptibility to genomic disorders.

Authors:  Santhosh Girirajan; Evan E Eichler
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2010-08-31       Impact factor: 6.150

Review 6.  Spindle formation, chromosome segregation and the spindle checkpoint in mammalian oocytes and susceptibility to meiotic error.

Authors:  E Vogt; M Kirsch-Volders; J Parry; U Eichenlaub-Ritter
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2007-11-09       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 7.  Small supernumerary marker chromosomes (sSMC) in humans.

Authors:  T Liehr; U Claussen; H Starke
Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.636

8.  Phenotypic heterogeneity of genomic disorders and rare copy-number variants.

Authors:  Santhosh Girirajan; Jill A Rosenfeld; Bradley P Coe; Sumit Parikh; Neil Friedman; Amy Goldstein; Robyn A Filipink; Juliann S McConnell; Brad Angle; Wendy S Meschino; Marjan M Nezarati; Alexander Asamoah; Kelly E Jackson; Gordon C Gowans; Judith A Martin; Erin P Carmany; David W Stockton; Rhonda E Schnur; Lynette S Penney; Donna M Martin; Salmo Raskin; Kathleen Leppig; Heidi Thiese; Rosemarie Smith; Erika Aberg; Dmitriy M Niyazov; Luis F Escobar; Dima El-Khechen; Kisha D Johnson; Robert R Lebel; Kiana Siefkas; Susie Ball; Natasha Shur; Marianne McGuire; Campbell K Brasington; J Edward Spence; Laura S Martin; Carol Clericuzio; Blake C Ballif; Lisa G Shaffer; Evan E Eichler
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Embryos whose polar bodies contain isolated reciprocal chromosome aneuploidy are almost always euploid.

Authors:  E J Forman; N R Treff; J M Stevens; H M Garnsey; M G Katz-Jaffe; R T Scott; W B Schoolcraft
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  Genetic and functional analyses of SHANK2 mutations suggest a multiple hit model of autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Claire S Leblond; Jutta Heinrich; Richard Delorme; Christian Proepper; Catalina Betancur; Guillaume Huguet; Marina Konyukh; Pauline Chaste; Elodie Ey; Maria Rastam; Henrik Anckarsäter; Gudrun Nygren; I Carina Gillberg; Jonas Melke; Roberto Toro; Beatrice Regnault; Fabien Fauchereau; Oriane Mercati; Nathalie Lemière; David Skuse; Martin Poot; Richard Holt; Anthony P Monaco; Irma Järvelä; Katri Kantojärvi; Raija Vanhala; Sarah Curran; David A Collier; Patrick Bolton; Andreas Chiocchetti; Sabine M Klauck; Fritz Poustka; Christine M Freitag; Regina Waltes; Marnie Kopp; Eftichia Duketis; Elena Bacchelli; Fiorella Minopoli; Liliana Ruta; Agatino Battaglia; Luigi Mazzone; Elena Maestrini; Ana F Sequeira; Barbara Oliveira; Astrid Vicente; Guiomar Oliveira; Dalila Pinto; Stephen W Scherer; Diana Zelenika; Marc Delepine; Mark Lathrop; Dominique Bonneau; Vincent Guinchat; Françoise Devillard; Brigitte Assouline; Marie-Christine Mouren; Marion Leboyer; Christopher Gillberg; Tobias M Boeckers; Thomas Bourgeron
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  5 in total

1.  Neocentromeres to the Rescue of Acentric Chromosome Fragments.

Authors:  Martin Poot
Journal:  Mol Syndromol       Date:  2017-10-11

2.  Genotype-phenotype correlation in 75 patients with small supernumerary marker chromosomes.

Authors:  Tingting Li; Haiquan Sang; Guoming Chu; Yuanyuan Zhang; Manlong Qi; Xiaoliang Liu; Wanting Cui; Yanyan Zhao
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 2.009

Review 3.  Small supernumerary marker chromosomes (sSMC) and male infertility: characterization of five new cases, review of the literature, and perspectives.

Authors:  Wafa Slimani; Afef Jelloul; Ahmed Al-Rikabi; Amira Sallem; Yosra Hasni; Salma Chachia; Adel Ernez; Anouar Chaieb; Mohamed Bibi; Thomas Liehr; Ali Saad; Soumaya Mougou-Zerelli
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Novel phenotype of 5p13.3-q11.2 duplication resulting from supernumerary marker chromosome 5: implications for management and genetic counseling.

Authors:  Margaret E Armstrong; David D Weaver; Melissa D Lah; Gail H Vance; Benjamin J Landis; Stephanie M Ware; Benjamin M Helm
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 2.009

5.  Supernumerary derivative 22 chromosome resulting from novel constitutional non-Robertsonian translocation: t(20;22)-Case Report.

Authors:  H C Manju; Supriya Bevinakoppamath; Deepa Bhat; Akila Prashant; Jayaram S Kadandale; P V V Gowri Sairam
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2022-03-26       Impact factor: 2.009

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.