Literature DB >> 18096427

Spindle formation, chromosome segregation and the spindle checkpoint in mammalian oocytes and susceptibility to meiotic error.

E Vogt1, M Kirsch-Volders, J Parry, U Eichenlaub-Ritter.   

Abstract

The spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) monitors attachment to microtubules and tension on chromosomes in mitosis and meiosis. It represents a surveillance mechanism that halts cells in M-phase in the presence of unattached chromosomes, associated with accumulation of checkpoint components, in particular, Mad2, at the kinetochores. A complex between the anaphase promoting factor/cylosome (APC/C), its accessory protein Cdc20 and proteins of the SAC renders APC/C inactive, usually until all chromosomes are properly assembled at the spindle equator (chromosome congression) and under tension from spindle fibres. Upon release from the SAC the APC/C can target proteins like cyclin B and securin for degradation by the proteasome. Securin degradation causes activation of separase proteolytic enzyme, and in mitosis cleavage of cohesin proteins at the centromeres and arms of sister chromatids. In meiosis I only the cohesin proteins at the sister chromatid arms are cleaved. This requires meiosis specific components and tight regulation by kinase and phosphatase activities. There is no S-phase between meiotic divisions. Second meiosis resembles mitosis. Mammalian oocytes arrest constitutively at metaphase II in presence of aligned chromosomes, which is due to the activity of the cytostatic factor (CSF). The SAC has been identified in spermatogenesis and oogenesis, but gender-differences may contribute to sex-specific differential responses to aneugens. The age-related reduction in expression of components of the SAC in mammalian oocytes may act synergistically with spindle and other cell organelles' dysfunction, and a partial loss of cohesion between sister chromatids to predispose oocytes to errors in chromosome segregation. This might affect dose-response to aneugens. In view of the tendency to have children at advanced maternal ages it appears relevant to pursue studies on consequences of ageing on the susceptibility of human oocytes to the induction of meiotic error by aneugens and establish models to assess risks to human health by environmental exposures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18096427     DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2007.10.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  71 in total

1.  On the paternal origin of trisomy 21 Down syndrome.

Authors:  Maj A Hultén; Suketu D Patel; Magnus Westgren; Nikos Papadogiannakis; Anna Maria Jonsson; Jon Jonasson; Erik Iwarsson
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 2.009

2.  Oocyte-specific differences in cell-cycle control create an innate susceptibility to meiotic errors.

Authors:  So Iha Nagaoka; Craig A Hodges; David F Albertini; Patricia Ann Hunt
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 3.  The consequences of asynapsis for mammalian meiosis.

Authors:  Paul S Burgoyne; Shantha K Mahadevaiah; James M A Turner
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  Germline mosaicism does not explain the maternal age effect on trisomy.

Authors:  Ross Rowsey; Anna Kashevarova; Brenda Murdoch; Carrie Dickenson; Tracey Woodruff; Edith Cheng; Patricia Hunt; Terry Hassold
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 2.802

5.  Mutations in TUBB8 cause a multiplicity of phenotypes in human oocytes and early embryos.

Authors:  Ruizhi Feng; Zheng Yan; Bin Li; Min Yu; Qing Sang; Guoling Tian; Yao Xu; Biaobang Chen; Ronggui Qu; Zhaogui Sun; Xiaoxi Sun; Li Jin; Lin He; Yanping Kuang; Nicholas J Cowan; Lei Wang
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 6.318

6.  The environmental toxicant 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin disturbs the establishment and maintenance of cell polarity in preimplantation rat embryos.

Authors:  Karla J Hutt; Zhanquan Shi; Brian K Petroff; David F Albertini
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 4.285

Review 7.  Genetics of mammalian meiosis: regulation, dynamics and impact on fertility.

Authors:  Mary Ann Handel; John C Schimenti
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 53.242

8.  Age-related increase in aneuploidy and alteration of gene expression in mouse first polar bodies.

Authors:  Ze-Xu Jiao; Min Xu; Teresa K Woodruff
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 9.  The biology of infertility: research advances and clinical challenges.

Authors:  Martin M Matzuk; Dolores J Lamb
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 10.  Emerging roles for centromeres in meiosis I chromosome segregation.

Authors:  Gloria A Brar; Angelika Amon
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 53.242

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.