Literature DB >> 25245454

Mitotic stability of small supernumerary marker chromosomes depends on their shape and telomeres - a long term in vitro study.

Shaymaa Subhi Hussein1, Katharina Kreskowski1, Monika Ziegler1, Elisabeth Klein1, Ahmed B Hamid1, Nadezda Kosyakova1, Marianne Volleth2, Thomas Liehr3, Xiaobo Fan1, Katja Piaszinski1.   

Abstract

Mosaicism is present in more than 50% of the cases with small supernumerary marker chromosomes (sSMCs) and karyotype 47,XX,+mar/46,XX or 47,XY,+mar/46,XY. Recently we provided first evidence that the mitotic stability of sSMC is dependent on their structure, i.e. their shape. Thus, here we performed a long term in vitro study on 12 selected cell lines from the Else Kröner-Fresenius-sSMC-cellbank (http://ssmc-tl.com/ekf-cellbank.html) to test mitotic sSMC stability systematically. The obtained results showed that inverted duplicated shaped and also the so-called complex sSMCs (group 1) are by far more stable, than centric-minute- or ring-shaped sSMCs (groups 2). Generally speaking, the percentage of cells with group-1-sSMCs remained stable over 90 days of cell culture, while that of group-2-sSMCs in parts dramatically decreased. In one group-2-cell line the sSMC was even lost completely after 30 days of in vitro culture, in others the sSMC was depleted in up to 40% of the cells. Still the highest rate of sSMC loss was recorded during EBV-transformation. Overall, the major difference between groups 1 and 2 was the number of telomeres per sSMC. In group 1 the sSMCs had "original" telomeres at both of their ends; in group 2 the sSMCs had either no, possibly secondary acquired and/or only one original telomere. This absence of protective telomeric sequences in group 2 seems to make sSMC more susceptible for loss during cell division. Still, also a growth advantage of cells without sSMC cannot be neglected entirely.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cell lines; Marker chromosome shape; Small supernumerary marker chromosomes (sSMCs); Telomeres

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25245454     DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2014.09.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gene        ISSN: 0378-1119            Impact factor:   3.688


  4 in total

1.  Multiple Small Supernumerary Marker Chromosomes Resulting from Maternal Meiosis I or II Errors.

Authors:  Ron Hochstenbach; Beata Nowakowska; Marianne Volleth; Amber Ummels; Anna Kutkowska-Kaźmierczak; Ewa Obersztyn; Kamila Ziemkiewicz; Claudia Gerloff; Denny Schanze; Martin Zenker; Petra Muschke; Ina Schanze; Martin Poot; Thomas Liehr
Journal:  Mol Syndromol       Date:  2015-10-31

2.  Divergent Levels of Marker Chromosomes in an hiPSC-Based Model of Psychosis.

Authors:  Julia Tcw; Claudia M B Carvalho; Bo Yuan; Shen Gu; Alyssa N Altheimer; Shane McCarthy; Dheeraj Malhotra; Jonathan Sebat; Arthur J Siegel; Uwe Rudolph; James R Lupski; Deborah L Levy; Kristen J Brennand
Journal:  Stem Cell Reports       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 7.765

3.  Double aneuploidy mosaicism involving chromosomes 18 and 21 in a neonate.

Authors:  Christina Mendiola; Veronica Ortega; Allison Britt; Rafael Fonseca; Gopalrao Velagaleti
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 2.009

Review 4.  The past, present, and future for constitutional ring chromosomes: A report of the international consortium for human ring chromosomes.

Authors:  Peining Li; Barbara Dupont; Qiping Hu; Marco Crimi; Yiping Shen; Igor Lebedev; Thomas Liehr
Journal:  HGG Adv       Date:  2022-09-10
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.