Literature DB >> 26997364

Rewarded visual items capture attention only in heterogeneous contexts.

Tobias Feldmann-Wüstefeld1,2, Ruben Brandhofer1, Anna Schubö1.   

Abstract

Reward is known to affect visual search performance. Rewarding targets can increase search performance, whereas rewarding distractors can decrease search performance. We used subcomponents of the N2pc in the event-related EEG, the NT (target negativity) and ND /PD (distractor negativity/positivity), in a visual search task to disentangle target and distractor processing related to reward. The visual search task comprised homogeneous and heterogeneous contexts in which a target and a colored distractor were embedded. After each correct trial, participants were given a monetary reward that depended on the color of the distractor. We found longer response times for displays with high-reward distractors compared to displays with low-reward distractors, indicating reward-induced interference, however, only for heterogeneous contexts. The NT component, indicative of attention deployment to the target, showed that target selection was impaired by high-reward distractors, regardless of the context homogeneity. Processing of distractors was not affected by reward in homogeneous contexts. In heterogeneous contexts, however, high-reward distractors were more likely to capture attention (ND ) and required more effort to be suppressed (PD ) than low-reward distractors. In sum the results showed that, despite the fact that target selection is impaired by high-reward distractors in both homogeneous and heterogeneous background contexts, high-reward distractors capture attention only in scenarios that foster attentional capture.
© 2016 Society for Psychophysiological Research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attentional capture; N2pc; NT; PD; Reward; Visual attention

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26997364     DOI: 10.1111/psyp.12641

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  10 in total

1.  Uncertainty modulates value-driven attentional capture.

Authors:  Sang A Cho; Yang Seok Cho
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Can salient stimuli really be suppressed?

Authors:  Seah Chang; Howard E Egeth
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Neural Evidence for the Contribution of Active Suppression During Working Memory Filtering.

Authors:  Tobias Feldmann-Wüstefeld; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 4.  What is abnormal about addiction-related attentional biases?

Authors:  Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 4.492

Review 5.  The Role of Inhibition in Avoiding Distraction by Salient Stimuli.

Authors:  Nicholas Gaspelin; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  The necessity to choose causes reward-related anticipatory biasing: Parieto-occipital alpha-band oscillations reveal suppression of low-value targets.

Authors:  Anna Heuer; Christian Wolf; Alexander C Schütz; Anna Schubö
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Controlling the Flow of Distracting Information in Working Memory.

Authors:  Nicole Hakim; Tobias Feldmann-Wüstefeld; Edward Awh; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Mixed signals: The effect of conflicting reward- and goal-driven biases on selective attention.

Authors:  Daniel Preciado; Jaap Munneke; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 9.  Selection history: How reward modulates selectivity of visual attention.

Authors:  Michel Failing; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-04

10.  Changes of Attention during Value-Based Reversal Learning Are Tracked by N2pc and Feedback-Related Negativity.

Authors:  Mariann Oemisch; Marcus R Watson; Thilo Womelsdorf; Anna Schubö
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 3.169

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.